Re
/m289:
As is typical of Gerald Moreno's moronic drivel, just see how he changes from day to day:
>> Now that Sanjay has been challenged to provide his posts made in other forums, he refuses to do it! <<
Excuse me, but the issue here is Gerald's
poor performance of research. He presumptuously claimed (with no evidence) that I had lied about O'Clery and Glen Meloy. When it was pointed out to him that this issue
was clarified (O'Clery, not Meloy) as per
/m270, he suddenly changed and asked
me to do his research for him (
/m274)!
So because Gerald Moreno is such a blatant lazybones who cannot be bothered to research properly,
despite actively participating in the same discussion forum, he now decides that I "refuse" to supply him with the information because
he is far too lazy to look for it himself.
No one is fooled by your lies, Joe. You are a lazy bum. If
you want to know about this issue,
you look for it. We all know it is there, and we both know how hard it is to look for things in the back archives of ssb2. :-) Tough luck,
you are in the business of cleaning gutters and collecting trash, so
you get on with what is expected of you. I have no need to lower myself to your level when I am engaged in the task of exposing a homosexual disgusting pervert like Sai Baba, and his disgusting followers such as yourself. :-)
Don't be switchin' your positions now! Be a goo dboy and admit where you're wrong. :-)
>> One will also notice that Sanjay claimed that O'Clery accepted that Sanjay never lied about O'Clery having sex with Sanjay's first-hand "informant" and David Bailey! Since Sanjay claimed that O'Clery "accepts" that Sanjay did not lie, O'Clery is admitting that he was banned from the Vancouver Sai Center for sexual molestation! So O'Clery is a pervert, a molestor and a homosexual! Sanjay just confirmed it and said O'Clery approved it as well! <<
This is the result of the fermentation within a psychopathic brain like Gerald Moreno's. OK Gerald, let me take pity on you and give you the
short version of the story (feel free to look for the posts on ssb2 to back it up, I'm still not doing your dirty work for you): Tony O'Clery claimed that I had made posts against him when I was a defending devotee of Sathya Sai Baba (and he was a critic), which consisted of allegations more or less like the ones you mention. Tony thinks that I did this because I was a brainwashed devotee who believed the information that was provided to me, which is apparently why I made those posts in the first place (
exactly like you do now, posting all your filth everywhere). The only problem is that I do not remember making such posts. I have no record of them in my files and nobody else does either. The posts are non-existent. Try finding them in the SSBDC archives if you can. In any case, if I did in fact make those posts then I publicly apologised to Tony (at least twice if I recall) on SSB2 and he accepted it. The issue is over, except for morons like you who perpetuate it. Look at your quoted paragraph above and see how silly it looks in light of the
facts.Now here's something for
you to answer: Since there is
no record of any defamatory postings by me against Tony, your
only source is an old post by Tony (on SSBDC) which he made when I turned into a critic, wherein he states that I should apologise for making those allegations against him. Since I have
no recollection of the posts at hand and
neither does Tony or anyone else,
your only source for this whole story is that one post from Tony demanding an apology. Until just now, you did
not know the whole facts of the matter, and you are on record in
several places making
unsubstantiated allegations against me for my apparent allegations against Tony (all on record of course).
Since you have also, in
many places, declared Tony O'Clery to be a pathological liar for many reasons of your own which you have so kindly documented :-),
you have to explain
why you believe Tony O'Clery's
one post that appears to have no substance to it? It's funny what you pick and choose to believe, isn't it? :-) It doesn't matter, we have noted your intellectual dishonesty in the past and we will continue to record it. :-) You are a bum and a deceitful rascal, picking and choosing anything just so you can get along with your job of smearing Sai Baba's critics. You even believe critics whenever it suits you, and disagree with the rest of it. LOL. No wonder you are a "f*****g wackjob", you sausage boy. :-)
>> One will also notice how Sanjay rants about how I do not care to clarify my comments by asking him directly. Once I ask him directly, he tells me it's none of my business and that he will expose my alleged lies on his own time. That's the reason I don't ask him :-) <<
Or it might be because Gerald Moreno is such a heartless conscience-less desultory piece of "humanity" that his response to any clarification about Glen Meloy will desecrate the memory of departed Glen Meloy. He will still do it when I decide to make my clarification, and I will be ready to record any such desecration when he does it. :-) The main point here is that Gerald Moreno simply does not know what he is talking about, and his statements so far on the subject are enough comedic material to keep us laughing until our sides are in danger of splitting. :-)
Psycho Joe, get it into you thick head:
NOBODY LISTENS TO YOU. :-) You are a confirmed psychopath and a "f*****g wackjob". You cannot even come up with a defensive Sai Baba argument to save your life, you pick on critics because they are easy targets, lol. You are a lily-livered sausage boy who nobody cares about. :-) For Christ's sake get it into your thick head and leave us alone to discuss Sai Baba, you moron.
