Lisa aks Joe .My answer to is

HA HA HA YOU HAVE NO GUTS TO SEE THE TRUTH

Tom Sackville, a former Home Office Minister, last night urged the Government to take decisive action to warn teachers and pilgrims of the dangers of becoming involved with Sai Baba. The guru's reputation is plummeting after the United Nations cancelled a conference at his headquarters, issuing a condemnation of his alleged sex abuse of youths and boys.

By the way Lisa wanted us Victims to go to the court and 'Sanal' the rationalist wrote to the PRESIDENT and the response was zero.
HO HO HO

Edited by author 02-22-2007 03:17 AM
I just don't realize that the more I say, the more insane I appear. Everyone is having a good laugh at me.What can I do I am paid by Baba to act like this

Edited by author 02-22-2007 05:49 AM
/m2310

No, Sai Baba isn't the accused, at this point he is the abused and harassed. In order for him to be the "accused" one of you cowards has to file charges you lowlife creepo. And, like I said, you are NOT a victim until you prove it in court. By all appearances you are a mentally disturbed anonymous harasser on the internet who cannot even prove he has a connection to Sai Baba.

Nobody feels sorry for a coward like you who hides behind over fifty usernames just to harass people.

Edited by author 02-28-2008 04:24 AM
/m2313

Yes, now we see why Sackville (what an appropros name for such an ignoramus) is a "former" Home Office Minister. Tony Colman lost his job as MP after he started using Parliament to attack Sai Baba without any proof of wrongdoing.

Too bad there are so many obvious racists in your camp, crudbaby.

BTW, you are NOT a victim until you prove it in court. You are merely an accuser at this point so don't flatter yourself. I don't even call you liars alleged victims anymore because you are so crooked I don't believe your claims. Not to mention you are just an anonymous harasser on the internet who cannot even prove he has ANY connection to Baba whatsoever so get real.

Edited by author 03-05-2008 07:16 AM
/m2308

Poor usedcrudbaby, he plays so many psychobabble games.
What drugs are you on? Nobody owes thugs like you an answer to begin with. But you are the hypocrite who keeps reminding people this board is about Sai Baba and now you are changing your rules? How dumb can you people possibly be? Just when one thinks you couldn't get any more hypocritical or dumb, you prove them wrong. Way to go, crudbaby.

And when are you going to say something intelligent? All you are doing is playing mind games and babbling like a nutcase. In other words, look in the mirror. How many phony usernames is that now ya wacko, fifty-three?
You should be ashamed of yourself for even trying to pretend that you are "honest" person. What a joke you are.

This page will show what a fraud and hypocrite usedbybaba aka usedcrybaby is:

USEDBYBABA EXPOSED EXPOSED EXPOSED ANONYMOUS WHACKO ATTACKING SAI BABA

Edited by author 02-22-2007 04:31 AM
/m2291

Tony O'Clery the pathological liar who lives in his fairytale world. Tony thinks his nonexistent affidavits can be used to arrest Sai Baba. What a dummy! Please, Tony, do give us an example of a case where someone was arrested using affidavits (and ones that don't exist at that).
Not to mention that Sai Baba cannot be arrested for "accusations" he committed a crime in India you dummy. US jurisdiction does not include India but apparently you are too stupid to understand this.


Trust me Tony, if you wackos keep trying to incite hatemongers and nutcases like yourself, you are going to have to pay legally for your harassment. It's that simple Tony. If you cannot get your cowardly accusers (who are ALL grown men so there is NO excuse for such cowardliness) to file charges like any other law-abiding citizen must do then you better just shut up because it's obvious they are lying. Too bad you are too dumb to understand this.



TONY O'CLERY EXPOSED

"You are right you will have to forgive my unsophistication. You see before I had any tertiary edu, I was a construction worker, cane-cutter, australian gigolo, union man, and surfer. Heaven for me was 'surfs up', and 'out the back', on Aussie beaches."--Tony O'Clery

Edited by author 03-08-2008 09:49 PM
/m2312

Once again, take a good long look in the mirror at your anonymous and cowardly face. Fifty-three phony usernames and counting that you have hidden behind, remember? I'm looking right smack dab at the truth and what I see are a bunch of pathological liars like you who ought to be thrown in jail for harassment and fraud.

Try proving your claims in court like any other accuser has to do, coward. You bozos aren't "special". You do not get special treatment just because you claim you are scared. You've ALL had PLENTY of time to arrange for protection so you can file your claims and you haven't even tried. One can easily surmise the ONLY reason you bozos are "scared" is because you know you will easily be shown to be liars as you have been revealed here on the internet. All you've done is play your psychopathic mind games on the internet for years.

This page will show what a fraud and hypocrite usedbybaba aka usedcrybaby is:

USEDBYBABA EXPOSED EXPOSED EXPOSED ANONYMOUS WHACKO ATTACKING SAI BABA

Persecutors of Sathya Sai Baba

TRUTH IS CHANGELESS

Every where truth pervades. Truth is propelling all over. Truth has no form and is every where. What ever you see is truth. (Swami now raises His hand, We all thought he is going to mention some thing about the bulbs but surprising all materializes a small golden object, to me it looked like a Lingam of the size of a peanut, He didn’t move His hands much, He got it from the thin air, as if He was plucking a fruit from a tree) it had a bright shine.. Swami continues This is Truth…where from this came and it will go back to truth again. (so saying He disappeared the object in the thin air) Sathyam is multidimensional. Truth is one but none can realize this. truth is not merely verbal. Truth can manifest in various forms. Brahma is one. God is only truth and all others are just reflections of divine. This truth has many names. Every thing has to emerge from truth. Dharma is originated from truth. There is no other Dharma beyond truth. When Sathya Dharma go together you get peace. Out of peace, you find love emanating. It binds every body. There is no place without love. Out of Love you have ananda (bliss). There is no hatred after you have love. If you want non-violence you should just have love. Mamai vamso jeevaloke jeeva bhootah sanatanaha we all are sparks of God. You are not separate. You are al MY reflections. Body and names may vary.. there is only one Atma in all. Body has got its own name.. why? For recognition. This is only for identification. Atma is same in all..

Lisa de witt wrote;'Tony O'Clery the pathological liar who lives in his fairytale world. Tony thinks his nonexistent affidavits can be used to arrest Sai Baba. What a dummy! Please, Tony, do give us an example of a case where someone was arrested using affidavits (and ones that don't exist at that).
Not to mention that Sai Baba cannot be arrested for "accusations" he committed a crime in India you dummy. US jurisdiction does not include India but apparently you are too stupid to understand this.'

Under Canadian, British, Australian and other jurisdictions, pedophilia abroad can be charged, if the sufferer is a citizen, I believe..Tony

In the meantime sue me or call the police. sb is a pervert, murderer, embezzler, thief, and pedophile---now I dare any sb org to sue me pleeeeeeaaaase!!

 "Tony OClery" <aoclery@> wrote:
> >
> > sb gave a discourse on hypnotism and it was in the sanathana
sarathi.
>
> Simon the genie who comes out of a bottle said; And the significance of that is?
>
Namaste
Because he uses it that's why. He has the siddhi of mass speaking like
hitler did, but his tantric conjurer uncle also obvioulsy taught him
more tricks like hypnotising people in small groups as well.Tony

Landmark ruling for child sex abuse vicitms


By Estelle Ellis

Adult survivors of child abuse can now sue their attackers for civil damages, even decades after it happened.

With this watershed judgment, the Supreme Court of Appeal has opened the doors for civil recourse for thousands of abuse survivors who had often been left without help, because previously, victims could not lay a charge for rape and child abuse if the crime happened more than 20 years earlier.

The application was brought by a Esme van Zijl, who was raped, sodomised and indecently assaulted by a relative more than 40 years ago.

In their judgment, the court has also recognised a well-known psychological phenomenon that adult survivors of child abuse sometimes take a long time to recognise that what they had suffered was not their fault.

'Abused children have a right of recourse against their abusers'The judgment, written by Justice of Appeal Jonathan Heher, brought South Africa on a par with the US, Australia, New Zealand and Canada in the recognition of the rights of adult survivors of child abuse.

Van Zijl, 51, wants to sue her relative, who is a retired businessman, so that she can pay for the extensive therapy she needs to overcome the serial rape and abuse she had allegedly suffered at his hands.

She claims that she was sexually abused, raped and sodomised by him between 1958 and 1965, starting when she was six years old.

In terms of the law, as it was before Monday's judgment, she should either have sued him within three years of the date that he first abused her, or in 1973, the year she turned 21. But Van Zijl became aware of the effect of abuse on her psyche, personality and ability to function as a person only in 1997.

"Abused children have a right of recourse against their abusers," Judge Heher said in his judgment.

'The law no longer conspires with perpetrators of child abuse to silence victims'"Until the 1980s, the right was seldom invoked and, in South Africa, probably not at all. Major reasons were cultural or societal taboos (many abusers are close family members), and ignorance.

"Since then, the boundaries of understanding of the psyche of survivors of child abuse have been pushed back by expert studies of the problem, and the true nature and extent of the effects of such abuse has been become better appreciated.

"As survivors have become more informed about their condition and rights, and have received support from public interest groups, there has been an upsurge in claims, many by adults who initiated proceedings years after the actual incidents.

"This, in turn, has given rise to a spate of cases, particularly in the United States, in which defendants have invoked limitations statutes," Judge Heher said.

"This is the first case of the kind in South Africa of which I am aware," he added.

He said society as a whole was, during the period prior to 1980, more conservative in matters involving sexual mores than it is now, and considerably less willing to confront sexual matters.

"Approaching the (case) as if it were akin to discovering cracks in a house foundation, does not demonstrate any great... sensitivity to the psychological and emotional problems suffered by a woman."

Michelle O'Sullivan, the director of the Woman's Legal Centre, which handled Van Zijl's case, said the case would affect how future cases of child sexual abuse would be handled by the courts.

"Other survivors will now be able to bring claims knowing that the law has developed an appreciation of the psychological obstacles that prevent adult survivors from bringing claims.

"The law no longer conspires with perpetrators of child abuse to silence victims by preventing survivors from claiming damages later in life, as it is now recognised that it is the abuse itself that often prevents a survivor from taking action. Abusers will not be able to rely on the Prescription Act to avoid such claims," she said.

* This article was originally published on page 6 of The Star on September 28, 2004

Dear Detective Clarke and Sgt. Dhillon
and
Former Devotees: James Danis, Barry Pittard, Robert Priddy and Tony
O'Clery

I want to thank Matt Clarke for taking my call this morning and to
share the
advice received from him.

As you all know, Canada has the distinction of having a tougher duty to
report law when it comes to child abuse and I have also recently
learned
there is no statute of limitations for prosecuting child sexual abuse
in
Canada no matter when it occurred.

That being the case, we still live in the real world of budget and
resource
limitations and according to Matt, if we really really want the
Minister of
Children and Family Development to take investigative action, we need
to be
able to furnish a list of specific names of British Columbia children
under
the age of 18 who are most vulnerable to being taken to India to see
Sathya
Sai Baba.

Some of them may already have been abused and of course, that would be
most
helpful to know as well.

After several discussions, I finally realized there is one person in
particular who would be most likely to be able to produce such a
list...namely Susan
Susan was a Bal Vikas teacher at the Vancouver Center for 25 years up
until
2001 and could strongly be presumed to have such a list. She would also
most
likely be able to tell or find out who are the current Bal Vikas
teachers at
the center.

Being in a position of care for children, emergency situations alone
would
dictate that she would have access to the names of all the children at
the
center and their parents address, telephone numbers etc...and possibly
even
a complete list of all the devotee members of the center.

Now the question is, what is the best approach to Susan?

It is my understanding that her current marriage partner may not
encourage
her to become involved in helping us, yet he and Susan did attend along
with
several other former devotees known to Mr. Danis a screening of the
"Secret
Swami" before it actually aired in Canada.

Perhaps a direct request from Matt might do the trick.

In any event, I am asking James to make Susan's phone number and
address
available to Matt and myself (I lost it when my computer database
crashed)
and I would appreciate hearing from any of you with your suggestions.

I do not want this opportunity to slip away and I agree with Matt that
we
need to furnish specific names to insure that our request to Minister
Hagen
and the other Ministers will not be ignored or side tracked.

Another possibility would involve the names, particularly of Sikh
children
under the age of 18 in the Delta Surrey areas of Greater Vancouver.
According to Tony, many of them already claim that SSB is a pedophile.
That
means their parents know and that their parents need to report what
they
know.

My rough draft to Minister Hagen is almost ready to send, but after
talking
to Matt this morning I will wait sending it until I hear from all of
you.

James has kindly volunteered to make the "Secret Swami" available to
Minister Hagen's office.

There is still another possibility on how to approach this, but that
would
involve Ottawa and I think we need to concentrate on British Columbia
first.

Thanks to all of you and Jai Expose'

Edited by author 02-22-2007 12:56 PM
Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay Dadlani systematically attacked me regarding my involvement on Wikipedia (in relation to the Sathya Sai Baba articles) for many months. Not only did Sanjay attack me on the SSB2 Yahoo Group, he created a blog (named "wikimoreno") that specifically targeted me based soley on my involvement with Wikipedia.

I first became aware of the Wikipedia user "Ekantik" back in September 2006 when he secretly and deceptively attempted to get Freelanceresearch (Lisa DeWitt) banned from Wikipedia behind her back (Refs: See Green Segments: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06). I immediately suspected an Anti-Sai Activist and informed Lisa about it.

On November 19th 2006, Sanjay created the user-name "Gaurasundara" (a name he uses, and has used, on numerous forums and blogs). He created this user-name to vote to keep Robert Priddy's user-page (Ref). Since Sanjay only made two edits (at that time) under the name "Gaurasundara", I didn't give him too much attention and soon forgot about him.

Not too long thereafter, Ekantik began editing the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia article and immediately began attempting to bully me by repeatedly accusing me of using Wikipedia as a "battleground", "soapbox", etc., and began flaunting Wikipedia policy in my face like he was some sort of Admin. Consequently, knowing Ekantik's past history with Lisa, I decided to research his edits (which anyone can do at any time because one's edits are public domain).

Based on Ekantik's edits, it became very clear that "Ekantik" was into Gaudiya Vaishnavism and I immediately suspected he was Sanjay. I noticed that he added AC BhaktiVedanta Prabhupada as a "Notable person of the 20th century" (Ref), added "motorhead" on the same article (Ref) and made an edit regarding Lemmy Kilmister (Ref). Since Sanjay devoted an entire blog to Motorhead and Lemmy Kilmister (named "WhoreHouse Blog") and is a Gaudiya Vaishnava (with a blog named Gaurasundara's Musings and is an editor on Gaudiya Kutir Wiki), this all but convinced me that "Ekantik" was Sanjay. I promptly emailed Lisa with my suspicions although I still had some doubts because "Ekantik" claimed he had a basic speaking command of Telugu, French, German and Italian (which Sanjay never publicly professed knowing before).

Then I discovered two edits that confirmed my suspicions. Sanjay changed his name from "Ekantik" to "Gaurasundara" on two separate occasions (Refs: See Green Sections: 01 - 02). I promptly confronted Sanjay with these edits and filed a sockpuppetry claim against him on Wikipedia. After filing my complaint, Sanjay immediately went into a frenzy and attempted to do damage control by changing his name on his "Gaurasundara's Musing" blog from "Gaurasundara das" (a name he has used since August 2005) to "Dark Knight".

After counting his losses, Sanjay reverted his name back to "Gaurasundara das" and admitted on Wikipedia that he was using the sockpuppet-name of "Gaurasundara" (Ref). Sanjay clearly attempted to pass himself off as two separate editors (he even greeted his "Gaurasundara" sockpuppet with his Ekantik account: Ref). How's that for deception?

Further sticking his foot in his mouth, Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Ekantik" aka "Gaurasundara") claimed, while incognito, that he was not a POV (point of view) editor (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03) and claimed that the primary reason he began participating on the Sathya Sai Baba article was based soley because of various Requests For Comment (Ref).

Of course, these are blatant lies. Sanjay has a wholly critical and negative POV about Sathya Sai Baba (unremittingly referring to him, even to this day, as a "homosexual paedophile" 01, "faggot guru child rapist" 02, "murderer" 03, among numerous other defamatory slurs and libels). Sanjay had been keeping watch over the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia Article for many months and often criticized me about my edits there. Sanjay attempted to portray himself as someone who was not involved in the Sai Controversy and engaged me in debate incognito. When I revealed Ekantik/Gaurasundara's name as "Sanjay Kishore Dadlani", he threw one of his typical flaming, shrieking and girly hissy-fits, frothing at the mouth and posting all sorts of warnings on my user-page. Boo hoo!

Keeping in tune with Sanjay's pornographic inclinations, he put the following quote about pornography on his userpage:

"Wikipedia is one of two good things on the internet. The other is porn." ~CaughtThinking (Ref)

Sanjay also has a userbox that states "This user rejects any violence towards women." Now read my article about What Sanjay Really Thinks Of Women and how he continually refers to women as "sluts" and "bitches". As a matter of fact, Sanjay made the following comments about women:

Fucking bitches, they owe me something. And every day that passes ain't helping their fucking case. Oh boy, am I getting madder and madder by the day. Oh boy, am I gonna burn them alive or what?

Fucking women, I decided today that I think all "hot" women fucking can go fuck themselves. Fucking snotty bitches, fucking little teasers, they can go die. Little bitches, brought up as sluts. fucking shitty females, my ass. They can go die.

Women as a whole are really starting to piss me off. Why don't they just go and fuck off? You either get "hot" women who prance about thinking that they're all that and how incredibly lucky you are to even be in their presence, or you get the ugly bitches whose tongues hang out for you all over the floor.

Usually I treat girls like the fucking sluts that they ARE.

Not only did Sanjay make these comments, he created a StreetBitches Blog where he stalked women and filmed them with his digicam under tables and up their dresses and which was aptly entitled "They Want It: Everywhere I Look, I See Bitches". Needless to say, another webmaster (a Gaudiya Vaishnava often praised by Sanjay) also caught Sanjay engaged in his deviant behavior on the StreetBitches Blog and wrote an email for me to forward to University officials to support my claims.

Sanjay believes that because I used the word "poo", I have some sort of "fascination for faecal material" and am a "toilet sex pervert". Well, Sanjay apparently suffers from the same "fascination for faecal material" and is a "toilet sex pervert" becuase he often uses the words "shit" and "bullshit". I discussed this in my blogged article entitled Sanjay's Disgusting Feces Obsession. Funny enough, Sanjay has a user-box on his user-page that states:

This person does not understand Bullshit (or understands it with considerable difficulties or does not wish to communicate in Bullshit).

As a matter of fact, the "bullshit" user-box was the first user-box that Sanjay included on his user-page (Ref). Sanjay, what is that again about people having "fascinations for faecal material" and being "toilet sex perverts" for simply using words that refer to feces?

And to top it all off, Sanjay openly professed being filled with bitterness and poison, having a serious drinking problem, being scared that he was becoming "unstable and psychotic" (Ref), having a Jesus-Sex-Fetish (01 - 02) and wondered about cutting his flesh with razors and thought it would be "quaintly romantic" to purchase a gun, put it in his mouth, lick the barrel with his tongue and blow his brains out (Ref).

It is nothing short of absurd to think that the one of the most vocal defamers of Sri Sathya Sai Baba is free of ulterior motives and is dedicated to neutrality on Wikipedia in relation to Sai Baba. Funny enough, that is exactly what Sanjay (aka "Ekantik" aka "Gaurasundara") wants others to believe.

I don't believe it or buy it for one second.

I wrote;Another possibility would involve the names, particularly of Sikh
children
under the age of 18 in the Delta Surrey areas of Greater Vancouver.
According to Tony, many of them already claim that SSB is a pedophile.
That
means their parents know and that their parents need to report what
they
know.

When I should have wrote.'in the sikh newspapers' according to Tony.

No matter what joe moreno says he is still off the board on wikipedia.