Edited by author 03-07-2008 11:35 PM
/m1849

This is another one of Tony's delusionary experiences which seem to be occuring more regularly these days.

Ever since I asked who raped Shanti McIvor, he has blown another gasket.

So WHO raped Shanti McIvor at 15 years of age? Was it Barry Pittard (who was in his fifties at the time)? There is no statute of limitations on this in Australia.

And another thing. The anti-sais continually berate everyone else for allegedly knowing about Sai Baba and not coming forward yet Barry Pittard claimed in a post online that Shanti saw Baba fondle someone in an interview but Barry just can't seem to get Shanti to come forward and spill the beans. Is this hypocritical or what? Who can take these bozos seriously when they even claim their own friends know about sexual abuse and won't come forward yet they berate everyone for illicit behavior they claim even their own friends AND family are engaging in? Timothy Conway claims he had the Hislop letters way back in the 80s yet did nothing about it until recently when the statue of limitations is past and he hypocritcally babbles about "mandatory reporting," knowing FULL WELL it was one of his "best friends (Prendergast)" who is a psychologist who allegedly received the letters and did absolutely nothing about them. Can anyone take such hypocrites and obvious liars like you seriously?

"In the other case, in her interview in April 1998, my wife Shanti saw Sai Baba covertly grasp the penis of a young man, Michael, a member of an Australian group. Straight after the interview, Shanti spoke to Michael, who told her and the group that he was "spun out by it all" (highly confused). This group was led by Valmai Worthington of Queensland."

Source (site has since been deleted...copy of post remains in my files):

http://www.quicktopic.com/9/H/ehfcBK8qrWRYZ/p-1.-1

And for the record, I would like to see proof that Pittard married Shanti since her name has ALWAYS remained McIvor and I think Pittard lied about this (probably because Shanti was pregnant in the 1998 ashram interview and that would be very much frowned upon if he was not married) like he lies about everything else. From what I understand, Pittard's second son, Sai Isa was born in 1999 out of wedlock when Pittard was 58 and Shanti was 20-21.


Persecutors of Sathya Sai Baba

Tony Bologna O'Clery, why don't you show where Lisa admitted having "lesbian experiences"? We would all like to see it.

Tony, perhaps the voices in your head told you? Or perhaps the demons told you?

• Sanjay Dadlani Exposed: /m272 /m1099
  "Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed




• "Usedbybaba" Exposed




• Barbara Dent Exposed




• Anthony "Tony" O'Clery Exposed



• Exposing The Lies, Deceit & Dishonesty Of Critics, Skeptics And Ex-Devotees Of Sathya Sai Baba: SaiSathyaSai.com"

Lisa has admitted lesbian experiences, do you think she like the gay pervatar because he is a deviant moletor as well? Not that I'm against gays but molestors and liars yes.
Saktidas in Cuba says he has some info on lisa and family from some former east germans there. I will post it when I get it. He says de witt isn't their name, but I won't post the real name as they aren't all ratbags like lisa.

Rebuttals to the salacious psychotics joe and lisa.


http://www.saiguru.net/english/articles/new1.htm

Indian Press starting to get on anti sai bandwagon.
http://barrypittard.wordpress.com/

As a wikipedian, let me just say this. If they thought sb was a fine upstanding spritiual person, they wouldn't have all the references to the exposes and tv programmes on him. They don't want to be sued so they refer to third parties and newspapers etc. Personal views on the well known criminal and pervatar are not allowed, or everyone would be slandered in every walk of life. It has nothing to do with sb being the epitomy of evil.

Edited by author 03-08-2008 12:20 AM
/m1844

Poor rebellious Tony, a juvenile delinquent who never grew up.

Anti-Sai babble (libel) is easily found on the internet. The point is Wikipedia does not consider most anti-Sai material to be reliable information. In fact, Tony was banned from Wikipedia for repeatedly vandalising the Sathya Sai Baba article with his libelous statements.

Neither does any mature adult with working brain cells. Especially when so much of it is infected with the hate virus whose hosts are a bunch of white guys, mostly Catholics like Tony O'Clery, Timothy Conway, Al Rahm, David Bailey, David Lane, Andries Dagneaux, and Keith Ord, strangely enough.


For the record, I have nothing against Catholics. I have relatives and friends who are Catholic. I feel it is important for the general public to know there are certain patterns which seem statisically predominant in what I believe is a racist smear campaign.


Persecutors of Sathya Sai Baba

All former files and pages are available on wikipedia.
Namaste,

On the wikipedia entry on the pervatar sathya sai baba, all the past files and entries are available...just go to history and click on any previous date..Tony.

/m1842

Yes, Tony, we know you are addicted to defaming
people with your hate speech and anything that
gets in your way causes you to go into psychotic
spasms...lol.

Wikipedia is NOT a tabloid. It is supposed to be an
encyclopedia which documents FACT, not fiction or
OPINION. The anti-Sais are so in denial they
refuse to see the facts as they are. Even the
admin on Wikipedia can see the anti-Sai hate
group for what it is. With people like Tony
O'Clery, Duncan Roads and Tal Brooke in their
group, they should change their name to
ANTI-SEMITES-R-US.

This is the new and hidden face of white supremacy folks. Take a good look at it.

 Re the wikipedia article on sb---Lisa
< wrote:
>
>
> ===Andries' editing privileges restricted===
> 1) In light of his ongoing activism at [[Sathya
> Sai Baba]] and the repeated failure of lesser
> dispute resolution mechanisms, [[User:Andries]]
> may not edit any articles in any way related to
> Sathya Sai Baba for a period of one year. During
> this time, he may not initiate or respond to any
> dispute resolution actions related to such

Namaste,

This is just wikipedia's new policy on living people and not wanting to
be sued etc etc. There is still a tremendous amount of references to
the expose of sb as a pedophile and a criminal in the article and is
still useful as an expose considering it is on wikipedia.........Tony.

None of this takes away from the truth that sb is an arse-bandit and criminal. All the anti sais could be anything, it doesn't matter./

Anthony Tony O'Clery Exposed and Exposing The Lies, Deceit & Dishonesty Of Critics, Skeptics And Ex-Devotees Of Sathya Sai Baba: SaiSathyaSai.com": In answer to anything Anti-Sai Activists have to say or anyone else on the Anti-Sai payroll to disrupt the net.

By way of a partner for him, Guérin had chosen the dean of our chapter: a tall, sturdy lass of about thirty-six, a great and chronic drunk, loutish, foul-mouthed, rather a fishmonger’s wife, although by no means unattractive; the good Président arrives, they are served supper, both get blind drunk, both become unreasonable, one vomits in the other’s mouth, the one swallows the stuff, then the other vomits into the mouth of the first, now he swallows, and so forth and so on, and they finally collapse into the supper’s debris, that is to say, into the filth they’ve just splashed all over the floor.

http://www.geocities.com/aoclery

In answer to anything lisajoe or joselisa have to say, or anyone else on the payroll of the sai-org to disrupt the net..

Baba did predict about students ruling India.He materialised a medallion or something with very small sanskrit words. Not easily readable. He said the names of those students who were to rule India was there in that. This was in 1978 or 1979 Summer Course.

Home Page:
Date: Tue Nov 29 15:26:14 2005
Referred By: Ramesh SVR IP: 203.112.80.139

Comments:

I am an ex student. Supposed to have been "In form" ( close to baba) i studied in the school and have gone through many of the things that is mentioned in the site.
Good job done david and faye. Hope this thing comes to light someday.
He is such an A** H*** for playing with little kids minds.