QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Sathya Sai Baba 2005: Who Is He?
Printer-Friendly Page
   << 1700-1715  1601-1699 of 2980  1585-1600 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom    (not accepting new messages)
Sathya Sai Baba  1699
12-29-2006 02:07 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-29-2006 02:13 PM
Lisa, Don,t spoil my name. I have been reading usedbybaba's posts.He never gave you any proper age.Ask him to give that first. He does not say anything clear about himself.Some how make him angry or hurt his ego and make sure that he spills the beans. After that I will do my job. But I think, now my condition is so bad that I cannot do anything to anyone. The Media is behind me and I should be careful. So you go find out with your team of four people.Rummage through all the mails and find out if he used any other name. Even if he does not use any other name,does it matter?We already told everyone that he writes in 50 different names.Now I will give you a few more names.Tell everyone that he writes in these names too.
George Bush,Tony blair, Manmohan Singh,Atal behari vajpayee,Magic Jhonson
Mohammed Ali,Mike Tyson.
Prem fart ma swaroopa lare,understand that my future is bleak.Understand thatI cannot do whatever I say.On top of that you unnecessarily quote the bible and make me ride a white horse.What will happen if I fall and die. Worse I might like the MALE horse Are you all fools. I have a few months or a few years to live,but if you want me to ride a horse,It will be the end of the Avatar.I want to molest more and more people.I know that I will die very soon.I am only worried about all of you.Where will you make money. Let me suggest something.Firstly,tell everyone that Swami (me of course),never said that he would live for more than 90 years.If someone quotes my earlier declaration,Call them names. Ask them who they are.If it is Sanjay or Tony,declare that they are perverts and racialists.
If someone else questions you,tell everyone that it is usedbybaba using one more name and he never studied in Prashnthinilayam, write anything you want and quote joe instead of usedbybaba.Joe is the only one who can
confuse anyone.
Then,after my death, go to Swami Premananda,who is in the jail.Glorify him
and he would be glad to pay you.

By the way,(only for your eyes Lisa) the university started in 1981 but my college came into exixtence in 1979 as Sri Sathya Sai college of Arts,Science and Commerce,affiliated to Venkateshwara University. Use this information.Tell everyone that usedbybaba never knew this.He also does not know that Brindawan college (white field) started in 1969. I made the old students of Brindawan as wardens of White field and Prashanthi nilayam.All of them were ungrateful (except C.Srinivas).
They left me one by one.Then after a few years the same thing happened in Prashanthi nilayam. Many of them waited till they got their degrees and then left.Selfish fellows. Some were unhappy that I did the Divine Kundalini molestation on them.Stupid fellows.We could have created a gay harem.
Tony O'Clery  1698
12-29-2006 12:37 PM ET (US)
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1697
12-29-2006 06:49 AM ET (US)
/m1693

"UsedByBaba" Lied About His Age:

On his Yahoo profile, "usedbybaba" claimed he was 54 years old (Ref). This means that usedbybaba would have been 18 in 1972. The Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning was founded on November 22, 1981, by Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba (Ref). Therefore, usedbybaba could not have attended Baba's college at that time (as he claimed) because it had not yet been founded. To complicate matters, usedbybaba also claimed that he was around 40 years of age on the SSB2 Yahoo Group (Ref). The lies and contradictions never end by confused-by-baba.
Sathya Sai Baba  1696
12-28-2006 09:27 PM ET (US)
http://media.radiosai.org/pages/20050909/index.html
Hey Joe.See photo number 14.There are two people,one talking to me and the other watching.The first person is Shiv shankar sai. A Phd in Physics,
I am supposed to have saved his dying mother(what can I do,he thinks so.He does not know that if someone surrenders to God (worshipped in any form including mine),God will help that person.Otherwise why is that people of all religions are finding their God responding to their sincere call. Stupid Shiv shankar Sai. For his faith,I molested him and he is happy that I did it. Now do you understand that I can brain wash anyone.

As far as the other person is concerned, he is Janardhan.Came to me late in his life. He was in his 30 s when he came to me. I don't remember molesting him before becoming a teacher in School. I did not molest him after he joined the School,He innocently sends me School boys who I like.
I need more fools like that.Can you send me ?
Sathya Sai Baba  1695
12-28-2006 11:44 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-28-2006 11:46 AM
Sanjay I warn you.Don't keep telling everyone that I am a child molestor.
Don't be too sure.I have even molested old men and women too.Of course I fancy young men. Why are so angry that I molest boys.After all it is within the family.(Sai family) I am the only person in the whole world who can increase the number of people within the family,as a homosexual.
This in itself is a miracle and you should be truthful enough to accept that.I have already proved that I am omniscient /m1691 and now you can see that I am omnipotent. Can't you appriciate that I am innovative. I am very kind.Do you understand that? I am kind enough to molest and bless children, men and some times even women. Is this not a chance for all of them.Only a few are blessed to see my darshan 'fully'.
I could have shown you my vishwaroopa dharshan,but you were not fortunate.
God did not bless you . uh I forgot I (God ) did not bless you.I forgot that I am God because I am busy drooling.

Hey, who is that talking to my 'Sai bhootha' I wiil throw you out of Puttaparthi. 'Sai bhootha' is mine. I have bought him from the zoo. I don't like anyone playing with him.

HE IS MINE

What if he is a Gorilla.Atleast he is male. I am not a chicken to go behind girls. I made sure that he is seperated from his, yuck, female partner.

By the way Sanjay I saw your photo. yum yum yummy. Can we be friends. Please. I will give you a gold watch and .....
Sathya Sai Baba  1694
12-28-2006 11:01 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-28-2006 11:01 AM
/m1693

I TOLD YOU

"gOOD JOB JOE,BUT I WILL PAY ONLY AFTER LISA SENDS HER ABUSE MESSAGE"

NOW I WILL PAY YOU. GOOD THAT YOU INFORMED LISA THAT SHE IS WANTED IN THIS FORUM
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1693
12-28-2006 04:51 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 02-29-2008 12:12 AM
/m1689

Usedcrybaby, you are a liar. There is absolutely no doubt about it.

And speaking of lies, are you "about forty" like you told Angel or are you fifty-four like it says on your profile? Obviously more lies told by you about your age like you lie about everything else.

Why is usedcrybaby so obsessed about whether Joe and I are celibate and WHY are sexually-fixated anti-Sais always trying to stick their noses into everyone elses sex lives?


Get help crybaby. Like Sanjay, you need it badly before you end up in jail.
Sathya Sai Baba  1692
12-28-2006 04:11 AM ET (US)
Joe be acreful about usedbybaba, see how he found out that YOU
POSTED THIS MESSAGE IN YAHOO FORUM.Angel,Please tell usedbybaba that he is lying (but as usual don't accept that you called him a liar)

I like all of you who are defending me

i get upset only when you all say you are not my devotees but just believe in me. Is there any difference? Why don't you tell me how to believe in me and not be a devotee.I can use it in my Discourse on Sankaranthi. Many of my close devotees are telling me that you are all ashamed to be called my devotees.Is it true?? Atleast for the money that you amke from me tell everyone that you are all my devotees.

Hey joe send me more of these porno ones. I am unable to do anything because I am on a wheel chair.Atleast I can watch some good stuff,before I kick the bucket.

EXPOSED EXPOSED EXPOSED



 HAS SENT THIS MESSAGE TO sathyasaibaba2 · Sathya Sai Baba DISCUSSION CLUB IN YAHOO.ONLY YOU AND YOUR BABA WILL ENJOY THESE POSTS

Cute Amateur Biker Babes looking for playmate! Check their profiles here:
http://www.bestbikerclub.com/bikerpro/sexybikerbabes.htm"

HE AND HIS MERCENARY DEVOTESS WANT TO SAVE HIM BY CALLING ME A LIAR.
BUT EVERYONE KNOWS THAT HE DID THIS TO DISRUPT THE DISCUSSION,BUT GOT CAUGHT.
__
_EXPOSED EXPOSED EXPOSED
Sathya Sai Baba  1691
12-28-2006 03:52 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-28-2006 03:55 AM
/m1690

I predicted "If he cannot an answer to a new question by Ex devotees,he would tell everyone that the person who is asking this question is Sanjay Dadlani or Tony or Usedbybaba"

ATLEAST NOW YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT I CAN PREDICT CORRECTLY AND I AM A DIVINE INCARNATION



gOOD JOB JOE,BUT I WILL PAY ONLY AFTER LISA SENDS HER ABUSE MESSAGE
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1690
12-28-2006 01:55 AM ET (US)
Now "usedbybaba" is using Baba's name. Time to update my page again. Now going on 50 fake names.

"Usedbybaba" Exposed



Exposing The Lies, Deceit & Dishonesty Of Critics, Skeptics And Ex-Devotees Of Sathya Sai Baba: SaiSathyaSai.com"
Sathya Sai Baba  1689
12-28-2006 01:45 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-28-2006 01:49 AM
http://home.no.net/anir/Sai/enigma/SaiSex.htm
joe 108 Says that all these people WHO SPEAK IN This web site are liars.Read these and tell everyone that joe is right because he is defending me.
Warning, Chickens and Fanatic devotees might faint.

I am Sathya Sai Baba of Puttparthi. Come near me and have sex with me or else you will be in trouble. What is wrong if I ,the lord of the world,have sex with mere mortals.They should all feel lucky that they have had the good fortune of being molested by me.After all I am not racial when it comes to Sex.All I need is a few Men,Boys and Children,every day.If anyone tries to prove that I am a fraud,they cannot,because,I have Politicians and the A.P. Police to support me and my family.If someone tries to tarnish my image,in the internet,I have hired a fantastic gang of three or four people,headed by Joe Moreno and Lisa the nut wit.I support them monetarily to make sure nobody talks about me (Sathya Sai Baba). I have read soem of their mails (joe and Lisa) LOL they are hilarious. If someones asks about me,Lisa will call them

"phony.complete idiocy or your inherent white supremacist tendencies/liar./deaf, dumb and blind (as USUAL) to get it/lying, brain dead wannabe intellectual
irresponsible idiocy,/obsessive-compulsive disorder for stupidity.
Bozo /nutter of negativity/negative pretender/so dense (and evil)
YOUR rotten fruits/Pathetic/Babble/dumbo./You are a disgusting excuse for a human being/Nutbal/idiotic little mind games? Only the ignorant and brain dead will/fall for your evasive maneuvering/hypocrite supreme
sewerbrained pervert/braindead/DUMB it is criminal/school drop out
liars like you/perverts/sewerbrain supreme/disgusting potty/Perverts Anonymous./big mouthed defamer" Great job Lisa Continue.

I will pay you more and more,plus you can also tell people stories about how I came in your Dream and made you wet.But I prefer joe better.I really admire joe.He is a very good sucker. He would try to take his pants off to confuse people.If you ask him his name he would say

EXPOSED,EXPOSED EXPOSED

That is his style. He would split your question and misquote. He would do anything to confuse you. I HAVE TOLD HIM TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE IS NO SENSIBLE DISCUSSION ON THE NET ABOUT ME.
The only problem is this guy will trun any day against me,if i do not pay.
He is a blood sucker. If he cannot an answer to a new question by Ex devotees,he would tell everyone that the person who is asking this question is Sanjay Dadlani or Tony or Usedbybaba. This way he would avoid answering any legitimate question.GREAT TACTIC IS IT NOT.According to Joe and Lisa , Any one questioning Me (Sathya Sai Baba) is Sanjay or Tony or usedbybaba) Who are all perverts, Racists and porno movie watchers.( Do you know a secret Joe himself down loads all these despeakable web sites and then blames the Anti sais.LOL) I HAVE DECIDED TO PAY THEM A LITTLE MORE THIS YEAR SO THAT THEY CAN CONTINUE THE JOB.NOW THAT THERE ARE PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS LIKE VIR SANGHVI WHO ARE QUETIONING ME,I NEED JOE TO TELL EVERYONE HOW NOTHING IS PROVED. After all how can you prove that I am a homo.For that matter nobody can prove whether joe or Lisa are virgins or celebates or anything,if someone does not complain.In my case no Indian would live after they complain against me. They would be nullified. They will not get any job.Nobody wiil do business with them. Former student of SSSIHL will never do anything against me.If they lose their certificates they have to coem to puttaparthi and so they never try anthing against me.SANJAY,TONY AND USEDBYBABA,BARBARA AND OTHERS WHO WRTIE THE TRUTH ABOUT ME, BE CAREFUL WHEN YOU COME TO PARTHI.THE VILLAGERS WHO MAKE A LOT OF MONEY BECAUSE OF ME,THE POLICE, THE POLITICIANS ,MY DEVOTEES AND MANY OTHER PEOPEL WILL DEFEND ME AGAINST YOU.
sai baba  1688
12-28-2006 12:45 AM ET (US)
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1687
12-27-2006 07:01 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-27-2006 07:04 PM
/m1681

So what? Your deluded buddies actually claim you are truthful and actually have a brain, doesn't make it so does it?

Truth and beliefs about what truth are are two different things. You are nit-picking because you are desperate and need to get a life.

You better learn to enjoy life while you are young bozo. As you get older you will become more disabled and those around you that you love will be dropping dead and you will wish you had enjoyed the lighter side of life while you had the chance.
Meera Powar  1686
12-27-2006 01:07 PM ET (US)
Connie: Then what about the Golden Age (of Peace and Plenty which will last for a thousand years)?

Baba: In five years. 2007. By then. All must do their part.

That will be great.With just a few days to go for Nem year 2007 I am sure we can expect alot.
Meera Powar  1685
12-27-2006 01:01 PM ET (US)
We had no water today in Mumbai and it was really difficult.
Meera Powar  1684
12-27-2006 01:00 PM ET (US)
What does biggie mean ?Is it an extention of big?
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  1683
12-27-2006 12:23 PM ET (US)
So??
it's no biggie.
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1682
12-26-2006 10:29 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-26-2006 10:30 PM

BREAKING NEWS: Sai Baba Resolves NOT To Visit Any Country

Further details when Xmas discourse published.

Source: Initial devotee report
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1681
12-26-2006 09:54 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-26-2006 09:55 PM

Actually it is a "biggie".

Sathya Sai Baba's followers gleefully proclaim that he is predicted as the Second Coming of Christ as per Revelations 19, with the small problem that Sai Baba himself doesn't agree because he insists that he is God. If Sai Baba's devotees want to keep claiming this then they can destory their intellectual dishonesty and explain the context of the other parts of Revelaiton that they conveniently ignore.

And this is not even the end of it; the "Islamic prophecy" is a total fake. The version put out by the Sai Org is not to be found in any Islamic texts, esoteric or exoteric. The predictions of the Mahdi that do exist are completely at odds with the version put out by the Sai Org.

Thus, they are liars. Plain and simple. What I'd like to know: Who was responsible for creating these lies?


BREAKING NEWS: The Guardian/DNA/Hindustan Times article has just been published at IndianMuslims.Info :-)
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1680
12-26-2006 09:48 PM ET (US)
/m1671

Ha ha ha ha ha ha, unbelievable! Now that Gerald Moreno has fully admitted that he is incredibly worried about the recent spate of critical SSB articles in several world newspapers and other types of publication, and is wringing his hands with worry, he wants to claim that he has received several "worried" emails. LOL, who believes that, that there are people out there who credit Gerald? I don't believe a single word. :-)

And for all of his worry and wringing his hands, he consoles himself by looking at his site stats and claiming (without proof) that they are up, thus cheering himself up. Can it get any more desperate than this? Sathya Sai Baba's name is dirt all over the world, and Gerald is jumping for joy and gleefully giggling about an alleged increase in traffic. Tough luck Gerald, the fact is that numerous reputable sources have carried allegations about SSB's paedophilia; if you want to argue that none of them can prove it, take it up with them. It is not our problem. What illogic, you cannot prove that any charge of paedophilia is false.

That is the very reason why nobody credits Gerald Moreno (SSS108) as a reliable source: He is not a representative of SSB and he is decidedly ambiguous about his motivations for defending SSB on the Internet 24/7. He cannot even stick to the subject of SSB most of the time as he is far too busy writing defamatory blogs and websites against critics of SSB. Nothing to worry about and no need to respond to foolishness.
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1679
12-26-2006 09:41 PM ET (US)
/m1670

"Funny Sanjay, everytime I try to talk about the issues, you resort to the same venomous slop of distractions, deflections and unreasonable arguments. There is no rationalizing with you."

Funny, this is a blatant lie: Gerald's entire history of posting on discussion boards shows that a significantly large proportion of his contributions are exactly that, "venomous slop of distractions, deflections and unreasonable arguments," especially since they consist of ad-hominem arguments and unrestricted personal attacks that have nothing whatsoever to do with the subject matter. Rationalising with Gerald? After telling him umpteen times to stick to the subject of Sai Baba and lay off his nonstop personal attacks, I have totally given up just like everyone else. The guy is lost in space.

"The hypocrisy of it all is that you are a fully exosed pervert and pathological liar. Everyone is still waiting for you to expose me with you "proof" that I posted on teen-porn sites. I have confronted you with this numerous times and you ignore it. You claim you have proof that could ruin my integrity and yet you continue to withhold your alleged proof. You are a big fat liar, with proof. You are unbelievable and no one believes you. No one can believe a liar."

Except for the fact that I haven't "lied" about anything, for all the so-called "proof" which are nothing but the above-mentioned distortions and distractions. Gerald has a long history of distorting and twisting people's statements out of context. A good example of this is how he went crazy labelling B. Pittard as a paedophile, which he was forced to retract after it was pointed out to him that he had misread his "information". And he couldn't even cobble together a grudging apology let alone a sincere one. Tsk tsk. There are many such examples.

And as for Gerald's exposure of teen-porn blogs and the like, I have already stated that I will reveal it on my own schedule, not yours. So do everyone a favour and quit whining, I am not going to respond to rude demands and insults.

"And despite all these mentions to the recent Guardian article, not even one single journalist can verify even one single claim of "pedophilia". Now that is sand to bury you head in!"

That's what you think. :-)
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  1678
12-26-2006 05:55 PM ET (US)
Revelations is an esoteric text and is not meant to be read literally. For example the seven churches of laodicea are the seven cakras. It is somewhat analogous to the battle of kurukshetra being an internal battle.
So quoting an esoteric text for a very exoteric entity like sb is ridiculous
______________

it's no biggie.
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1677
12-26-2006 04:38 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-26-2006 11:10 PM
/m1673

Angel, just remember this hypocritical "realist" drivel when Sanjay starts driveling about his dolly dieties and other stuff on his "gaurasundara's musings" blog.
Meera Powar  1676
12-26-2006 02:03 PM ET (US)
I just came across this in http://saibaba.ws/articles/connieshawtrip.htm

c. Baba healed a boy with high blood pressure in the rear Interview Room. He said He would bless and heal others.

d. Connie asked Baba in the rear room, "Swami, NO JOKING NOW, how much longer will the war last? Really, NO JOKING!"

Baba: Really, no joking. (He made some invisible writing in the air.)
Five years more. In 2007 there will be no more war. Peace on earth.

Connie: Five more years?! Then really, truly the war will be over?

Baba: Yes, you will see.

Connie: Then what about the Golden Age (of Peace and Plenty which will last for a thousand years)? When will that actually be here?

Baba: The Golden Age must begin in each person's heart. Then only can we have peace on earth. Each must start now to make the Golden Age in his heart.

Connie: But Swami, we're all doing the best we can in that
(department) now. I mean when will (all of) humanity agree - This is the Golden Age, here, now?

Baba: In five years. 2007. By then. All must do their part. He
blessed the group, answered personal questions and specifically told Connie to do Sai radio, TV and to write (books, articles) consistently. She has been doing radio and TV off and on for decades.

Wonder what you all feel abot this
Meera Powar  1675
12-26-2006 01:29 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-26-2006 01:35 PM
"I saw heaven standing open and there before me was a white horse-Where is his horse

 "whose rider is called Faithful and True." - I don't see the word faithful in his name

"With justice he judges and makes war".---- Never fought even a battle till date and most probably will never fight

His eyes are like blazing fire, and on his head are many crowns--Fire ? As a normal person,I am not able to see any fire

crowns,-Maybe

"He has a name written on him that no one knows but he himself"- no proof

He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God----word of God is 'Amen 'or in Hinduism it is 'OM'

The armies of heaven were following him, riding on white horses and dressed in fine linen, white and clean-- This could have been introduced after reading the bible by Sathya Sai Baba on the advice of his learned devotees

 Out of his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations----Lingam is never Sharp,it is always like an egg.

He will rule them with an iron scepter--- Till today he has not and he is on a wheel chair(that is what I heard)

On his robe and on his thigh he has this name written:-known only to Sathya sai

If we realy want proof of his Divinity,we should carefully go through everything. Especially when we are asking for proof from people who are aginst sathya sai baba
Tony O'Clery  1674
12-26-2006 11:32 AM ET (US)
Revelations is an esoteric text and is not meant to be read literally. For example the seven churches of laodicea are the seven cakras. It is somewhat analogous to the battle of kurukshetra being an internal battle.
So quoting an esoteric text for a very exoteric entity like sb is ridiculous.
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  1673
12-26-2006 08:40 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-26-2006 08:43 AM
"Kristijan, then explain the identity of the beast and the false prophet? If you want to contend that Sai Baba is predicted in Revelations then you will have to answer to the other things the Bible says about the "Rider of the White Horse". So has Sathya Sai Baba advented to kill the Anti-Christ in an apocalyptic battle or not? Do you even realise how insane this fundamentalist Armageddon nonsense sounds to a realist? :-)"

_____________

nobody needs to answer anything,not everything has to make sense.
some stuff from that "prophecy" fits sb.
It's no biggie.
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1672
12-26-2006 01:48 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 03-04-2008 10:52 PM
/m1668

How ironic that Sai Baba is being smeared by a bunch of pathological liars, alcoholics and sex perverts like Sanjay Dadlani aka saibabaexposed, the Whore of Babble-on. One can only wonder why flunky journalists listen to such losers and are so dumb as to actually take them seriously without checking the facts. Those are the same type of very dangerous journalists that licked Hitler's boots.


Keep burying your head in the sand, Sanjay et al. The whole world now knows what slimeballs you are and there is no escaping it.

BTW, the Alexa stats show exbaba.com traffic as down 100% in the last three month period whereas sathyasai.org's stats are UP 45% in the last three months. Sathyasai.org's stats go into the hundreds of thousands on the graph whereas exbaba.com doesn't even show up.

This means that people are running away from exbaba.com in droves.

Persecutors of Sathya Sai Baba
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1671
12-26-2006 01:02 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-26-2006 01:08 AM
A thought just occurred to me. I was thinking how the original The Guardian Article About Sathya Sai Baba was duplicated in about 5 other media sources. A month and a half later, the newer circulating version has been duplicated in over a dozen (and counting) media sources.

Ironic enough, one and half months later and my article about The British Controversy, Paul Lewis And The Anti-Sai Hackjob is well situated in Google's ranking. This means, of course, that those who are truly interested in this matter will research it and will find my high-ranking webpage about it :-)

To verify this, I just looked at my site stats and they are up 65%, all directly related to Paul Lewis and Vir Sanghvi. This is actually a stroke of good luck! The timing could not have been more perfect. As Sanjay would say, "WOW!" lol
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1670
12-26-2006 12:07 AM ET (US)
Funny Sanjay, everytime I try to talk about the issues, you resort to the same venomous slop of distractions, deflections and unreasonable arguments. There is no rationalizing with you. The hypocrisy of it all is that you are a fully exosed pervert and pathological liar. Everyone is still waiting for you to expose me with you "proof" that I posted on teen-porn sites. I have confronted you with this numerous times and you ignore it. You claim you have proof that could ruin my integrity and yet you continue to withhold your alleged proof. You are a big fat liar, with proof. You are unbelievable and no one believes you. No one can believe a liar.

And despite all these mentions to the recent Guardian article, not even one single journalist can verify even one single claim of "pedophilia". Now that is sand to bury you head in!

Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1669
12-25-2006 10:39 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-25-2006 10:45 PM
The recent Guardian/DNA/Hindustan Times article has been published further in the Times of India and Zee News. "Flunky" journalism? That's right, bury your heads even deeper in the sand and keep telling yourself that. It's all downhill for Sai Baba from here. :-)

Remember, Sai Baba himself regards the Times of India as a good newspaper, which he himself reads every day. I guess he won't object to their reporting of this controversy about him, why should he? It is a good newspaper according to him. :-)

BREAKING NEWS: Sai Baba spoke about Idi Amin in his Xmas discourse. This'll be fun. :-)
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1668
12-25-2006 10:36 PM ET (US)
What off-wiki attacks? What anonymous usernames? What racism comments coming from a racist? If Gerald wants to avoid the issues as he usually does and attack me instead, tough luck as everyone can see how pathetic it is. We have to remember that neither Lisa or Gerald have the guts to confirm and fully clarify their status regarding Sai Baba, whether they are devotees or not. Even if they do clarify it, it won't matter because true Sai devotees are genuinely a bunch of nice folk who would spit in Gerald and Lisa's faces out of disgust for their abuse, and pathetic "representation" of Sathya Sai Baba. Now he is threatening to "push his POV" on Wikipedia, when everyone including several admin are already annoyed with him for his bad behaviour and a pending ArbCom canse.

How ironic that Sai Baba is "defended" by a couple of lamebrains who do not even believ ein him? LOL.

Kristijan, then explain the identity of the beast and the false prophet? If you want to contend that Sai Baba is predicted in Revelations then you will have to answer to the other things the Bible says about the "Rider of the White Horse". So has Sathya Sai Baba advented to kill the Anti-Christ in an apocalyptic battle or not? Do you even realise how insane this fundamentalist Armageddon nonsense sounds to a realist? :-)
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1667
12-25-2006 08:35 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-26-2006 01:44 AM
/m1660

Dadlani the hypocrite, all of your attacks are off-wiki attacks except for the time you created an anonymous username (Ekantik) and tried to play your sociopathic mind games on wikipedia.
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1666
12-25-2006 05:05 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 02-28-2008 04:51 AM
All of this babble from the anti-Sais is just a device to distract from the fact that they have been caught in their lies about Baba being a pedophile. All of the grown men who claimed to have been sexually abused were trying to hide behide the cloak of child molestation and once that was unveiled for the lie that it was, their credibility went down the drain.

The anti-Sais are left, once again, to babble on the internet and coerce flunky journalists into their web of continuing and very racist-smelling deceit.


Persecutors of Sathya Sai Baba
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  1665
12-25-2006 02:25 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-25-2006 04:07 PM
/m1662
"EVery prophecy that sb has said about himself has been proven to be distorted or downright lies. Everyone has been refuted and proven so. From Aurobindo and Mohammed all the way to the Revelations. Revelations is esoteric anyway and is about internal battles and processes such as Kundalini etc."
______________

say what you want, but either way ,it is weird that so many things said in Revelations fit SB's appearance.It's not just one,but a few.It probably bugs you a bit.

stuff like this....



"called Faithful and True...Eyes like fire and on his head are many crowns"
(his birth name is Sathya ...i said few days ago,there's something weird going on with his eyes at moments ,his gaze from some angle at times is unnatural and his hair does look like a crown ,sorta )
 


"He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God."

(he sometimes wears that cherry red robe,his name is the word of God...the Truth,maybe???)


"The armies of heaven were following him dressed in fine linen, white and clean"
(his devotees are dressed that way)


"Out of his mouth comes"

(lingam ...)
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1664
12-25-2006 01:07 PM ET (US)
Funny, despite all these allegations of "pedophilia", not even one critic, skeptic, rationalist, journalist or media can verify even one single instance of pedophilia against Sathya Sai Baba! Anti-Sai's love to boast about all the media that has spoken against Sathya Sai Baba. Despite all these media organizations and journalists investigating and reporting the issue for 6 years, no one can confirm even one single case of paedophilia. Gee, I wonder why? Oh, I forgot, Anti-Sai's are keeping that information "secret". Pathetic.

Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1663
12-25-2006 12:59 PM ET (US)
Too funny! Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED", aka "Gaurasundara", aka "Dark Knight", aka "Azra`iL") is now complaining about "off wiki personal attacks" when he has done nothing but attack me and others during all this time! lol

Sanjay, your denial won't put others in denail. You are a pervert, pathological liar and deceiver with proof. A position I am perfectly ready to defend on Wikipedia if you want to push the issue :-)

Since you reposted your former comments, I will repost mine:

- Sanjay & Gomorrah: Dadlani's Jesus Sex Fetish
- Sanjay's Requests For Pornographic Material

Sanjay's discoursing on Jesus and the Bible is akin to a prostitute discoursing on abstinence.

All that can be said about Sanjay's arguments is that he is consistently inconsistent and critically hypocritical. This is the guy who Anti-Sai Activists endorse, promote and fully associate themselves with. For shame!

Tony O'Clery  1662
12-25-2006 12:49 PM ET (US)
EVery prophecy that sb has said about himself has been proven to be distorted or downright lies. Everyone has been refuted and proven so. From Aurobindo and Mohammed all the way to the Revelations. Revelations is esoteric anyway and is about internal battles and processes such as Kundalini etc.
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  1661
12-25-2006 08:02 AM ET (US)
"I saw heaven standing open and there before me was a white horse, whose rider is called Faithful and True. With justice he judges and makes war. His eyes are like blazing fire, and on his head are many crowns. He has a name written on him that no one knows but he himself. He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God. The armies of heaven were following him, riding on white horses and dressed in fine linen, white and clean. Out of his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations. 'He will rule them with an iron scepter.' He treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty. On his robe and on his thigh he has this name written:

'KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.'"


______

that's weird
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1660
12-25-2006 12:43 AM ET (US)
More off-Wiki attacks that expose Gerald Moreno (SSS108) as an ad-hominem attacker who is pathologically unable to address the issues regarding Sathya Sai Baba and simply resorts to ad-hominem personal attacks instead. That too on Christmas Day. Merry Christmas Gerald. :-) Merry Christmas Sai Baba! :-)

--

"I saw heaven standing open and there before me was a white horse, whose rider is called Faithful and True. With justice he judges and makes war. His eyes are like blazing fire, and on his head are many crowns. He has a name written on him that no one knows but he himself. He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God. The armies of heaven were following him, riding on white horses and dressed in fine linen, white and clean. Out of his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations. 'He will rule them with an iron scepter.' He treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty. On his robe and on his thigh he has this name written:

'KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.'"

Sound familiar? Yes, that's from the Bible, Revelations 19.11-16 to be precise. This is a staple of Sai literature by way of their incorrigible attempts to prove that Sathya Sai Baba is the Messiah and his coming was foretold in acient scriptures. Without complicating the present issue, we may also observe that such claims of messiahship extend to other religions besides Christianity.

I say incorrigible because history bears witness to the justification of the vilest acts that were legitimised by the twisting of scripture. Irregardless of the intent of Revelations 19, Sai devotees interpret all of the scriptural qualities as being present in the person of Sai Baba, not least the fact that the Baba himself is responsible for this. Let us take a look at his own words of Christmas Day, 1972:

"There is one point that I cannot but bring to your special notice today. At the moment when Jesus was merging in the Supreme Principle of Divinity, He communicated some news to his followers ... The statement itself has been manipulated and tangled into a conundrum. The statement of Christ is simple: 'He who sent me among you will come again!' and he pointed to a Lamb. The Lamb is merely a symbol, a sign. It stands for the Voice - Ba-Ba; the announcement was the Advent of Baba. 'His Name will be Truth,' Christ declared. Sathya means Truth. 'He will wear a robe of red, a bloodred robe.' (Here Baba pointed to the robe He was wearing!). 'He will be short, with a crown (of hair). The Lamb is the sign and symbol of Love.' Christ did not declare that he will come again. He said, 'He who made me will come again.' That Ba-ba is this Baba and Sai, the short, curly-hair-crowned red-robed Baba, is come."

No, there is no use rubbing your eyes in disbelief, he really did say that in front of a packed crowd of Westerners on Christmas Day. Talk about seizing opportunities, just check out the way that he is not content with declaring himself the Messiah (Christ come again) but insists upon being recognised as GOD, He who supposedly <i>sent</ipan> Christ into the world.

One thing that I absolutely love about Sai devotees is the way they manage to take everything completely out of context while keeping a straight face. By this I am referring to the 'Rider of the White Horse' mentioned in Revelations; Verses 19-21 speak of both a 'beast' and a 'false prophet' who will war with the horse's rider (ostensibly the Messiah) and be defeated by him by a sword that emerges out of the rider's mouth. All's fair in love and weirdness as some may say, but who are these beasts and false prophets running around all over the place? For that we must turn to Revelations 13 (of course, which other number would work?) to find out all about the Beast and the infamous '666' number. Yup, it's our old friend the Anti-Christ.

Now if Sai Baba is identifying himself as the rider on the white horse mentioned in the Bible, what does it mean to suggest that he will be responsible for the killing of the Anti-Christ? What does it say about Sai Baba's leanings towards Fundamentalist Christianity? What does it say about Sai Baa-baa's apparent endorsement of mythical and devilish figures? What does it say about Sai BlahBlah's infinite capacity to talk crap?

In any case, isn't it ironic how Sai Baba is viewed in some quarters as being the Anti-Christ incarnate? With all his relentless self-flattery about being the very same God who sent Jesus Christ, he can't even get his story straight about that. Constant confusion is par for the course with this Baba, and it was one of the reasons why I felt unable to continue following him in good conscience. Sai Baba could perhaps redeem himself and return to his former glory as Superbaba again if only he made the effort, bearing in mind that claims to be God or Jesus have lost their novelty when they are made by practically every drunk, drug addict or schizophrenic. There's an idea I'll submit to him for his New Year's Resolutions; Think up some more creative ways to keep a grip on your dwindling followers by re-asserting your godhood and absolute control over their lives. If in doubt, hire a good PR consultant.

Happy Holidays. :-)
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1659
12-25-2006 12:21 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-25-2006 12:26 AM
It smacks loudly of hypocrisy when Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED", aka "Gaurasundara", aka "Dark Knight", aka "Azra`iL") has the audacity to discuss Jesus Christ and the Bible in light of his requests for Jesus, Biblical and Disney pornography and his public boasting about how his long-haired "Jesus look" was getting more sex with women! No kidding. As a matter of fact, the proof is still located on Google's Adult Groups:

- Sanjay & Gomorrah: Dadlani's Jesus Sex Fetish
- Sanjay's Requests For Pornographic Material

Sanjay's discoursing on Jesus and the Bible is akin to a prostitute discoursing on abstinence.

All that can be said about Sanjay's arguments is that he is consistently inconsistent and critically hypocritical. This is the guy who Anti-Sai Activists endorse, promote and fully associate themselves with. For shame!

Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1658
12-25-2006 12:12 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-25-2006 12:13 AM
Tsk tsk, more examples of off-wiki attacks using my private and personal blog entires to boot. Further proof of Gerald Morneo's stalking/harassment tendencies and continued avoidance/deflection away from Sathya Sai Baba in favour of ad-hominem attacking SB's critics. More evidence of being completely unable to edit Wikipedia articles in good faith.

Tsk, everyone is starting to notice the desperation, Mr. Moreno. Nobody cares for the opinion of a pro-Sai fanatic who has been kicked out (three times in a row) of every forum he has participated in. Christmas cheer for you. :-)

Suck on this:

"Tom Sackville, a former Home Office minister and chairman of FAIR, a cult-watching and victim support group, said: 'It is appallingly naive for the award scheme to involve young people and the royal family with an organisation whose leader is accused of paedophilia. Parents who plan to send their children on this month's pilgrimage ... should be aware of the danger their children are being exposed to."

- The Guardian
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1657
12-24-2006 11:33 PM ET (US)
Sanjay Dadlani's (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED") yearly Christmas Complaints:

Taken from Sanjay's former Killuminati blog entitled "Christmas Cheer" published on December 26th 2004:
"The thing about Christmas is that almost EVERYONE complains about the crap presents that they receive. I don't blame them, especially presents consist of utterly boring things such as a new pair of socks, jumpers, scarves, etc. Very rarely does anyone actually get what they want. Men NEVER get their Black & Decker All-purpose Driller, women NEVER get their Trilogy jewellery from Ernest Jones, Santa Claus NEVER eats the milk/alcohol and cookies that the kids put out for him..

..But then again, Santa has a good excuse. He doesn't exist.

I spent a lot of time thinking what to get for Mum and Dad. Well, the usual options for their birthdays are usually a new bottle of Oil of Olay and a bottle of aftershave respectively. This year I decided to do something a bit useful with all the money I have. I saw an advert on the telly about a hairdryer that was on offer, so I thought I'd get that for Mum. I also figured that since the radio in the kitchen is extremely shitty and gets poor reception, I might make Mum happy and get her a new one. While she pretends that she is happy with what she is, it still stands that a new radio is definitely needed since the current one was about two decades out of date. Since I'd get Mum a hairdryer, the radio could be considered a present for the "house", or at least a late anniversary present since I completely forgot about their anniversary (oops!). For Dad, I figured I might get him a bottle of Disaronno.

I actually did get all this stuff a few days ago. Like a little child I was so excited about it that I wanted to pull them out and gift it to them immediately, but I held myself in and managed to keep quiet. Christmas Eve night I excitedly placed them in position so that the parents would get a surprise when they sat down in their chairs next morning.

Well, the long and the short of it is that they basically appreciated that I had gone to the effort but they didn't like the presents. Unbelievable! I KNEW that Mum wouldn't like her presents. Apparently the hairdryer is unnecessary even though it is a Revlon professional. And the radio would get dirty in the kitchen. What a fucking lame excuse. I could have got her just a radio, but for 3 quid more I got her one with a CD player included in it. I suspect that they will ask for the receipts for exchanging.

It hurts when your own parents don't appreciate your gifts. You might think they would be sensitive enough to hide their feelings but nooooooo, they had to ask me questions like when and where I got it from, asking for the receipts etc. Coz apparently Tesco's has a cheaper radio. What kind of shit does Tesco sell anyway?

This reminds me of a few years earlier when I was more or less a schoolkid and I saved up al the spare change I had to get Mum a crystal keyring and a tiepin for Dad, for their anniversary. They didn't fucking appreciate those either, they went and exchanged the two for a stupic clock that they don't even use!

Why don't people have any fucking sensitivity ?? I could have got them crappy stuff like socks and shit, but I didn't! I bought ELECTRONICS wiv mah moolah! I went into a fucking sulk all day. I spend all that time thinking what actually might be useful and getting excited about it, only to get all down about it. I didn't see Dad complaining about his Disaronna though, naturally. Who wouldn't like Disaronna?

Oh yes, and did I mention that I got NOTHING for Christmas?


P.S. At the time of writing I have made a small discovery. Apparently my parents have played the same trick on me by leaving an envelope at my computer station with 50 quid in if for my present. While it is a nice gesture, it lacks imagination. They know that there are several things that I might like but no one shows any sign of going out and getting it. I am still very disappointed and hurt. At least Anna got soemthing nice. I'm almost jealous.

Why, oh why did I expect anything to be different anyway? My fucking fmaily ain't big on celebrations. Why, we don't even celebrate sodding Christmas so they may have an excuse, but what excuse can there be for not getting me stuff on my BIRTHDAY?"

Talk about a whiny crybaby! waaa waaa lol

Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1656
12-24-2006 10:51 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-24-2006 10:57 PM
"I saw heaven standing open and there before me was a white horse, whose rider is called Faithful and True. With justice he judges and makes war. His eyes are like blazing fire, and on his head are many crowns. He has a name written on him that no one knows but he himself. He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God. The armies of heaven were following him, riding on white horses and dressed in fine linen, white and clean. Out of his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations. 'He will rule them with an iron scepter.' He treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty. On his robe and on his thigh he has this name written:

'KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.'"

Sound familiar? Yes, that's from the Bible, Revelations 19.11-16 to be precise. This is a staple of Sai literature by way of their incorrigible attempts to prove that Sathya Sai Baba is the Messiah and his coming was foretold in acient scriptures. Without complicating the present issue, we may also observe that such claims of messiahship extend to other religions besides Christianity.

I say incorrigible because history bears witness to the justification of the vilest acts that were legitimised by the twisting of scripture. Irregardless of the intent of Revelations 19, Sai devotees interpret all of the scriptural qualities as being present in the person of Sai Baba, not least the fact that the Baba himself is responsible for this. Let us take a look at his own words of Christmas Day, 1972:

"There is one point that I cannot but bring to your special notice today. At the moment when Jesus was merging in the Supreme Principle of Divinity, He communicated some news to his followers ... The statement itself has been manipulated and tangled into a conundrum. The statement of Christ is simple: 'He who sent me among you will come again!' and he pointed to a Lamb. The Lamb is merely a symbol, a sign. It stands for the Voice - Ba-Ba; the announcement was the Advent of Baba. 'His Name will be Truth,' Christ declared. Sathya means Truth. 'He will wear a robe of red, a bloodred robe.' (Here Baba pointed to the robe He was wearing!). 'He will be short, with a crown (of hair). The Lamb is the sign and symbol of Love.' Christ did not declare that he will come again. He said, 'He who made me will come again.' That Ba-ba is this Baba and Sai, the short, curly-hair-crowned red-robed Baba, is come."

No, there is no use rubbing your eyes in disbelief, he really did say that in front of a packed crowd of Westerners on Christmas Day. Talk about seizing opportunities, just check out the way that he is not content with declaring himself the Messiah (Christ come again) but insists upon being recognised as GOD, He who supposedly <i>sent</ipan> Christ into the world.

One thing that I absolutely love about Sai devotees is the way they manage to take everything completely out of context while keeping a straight face. By this I am referring to the 'Rider of the White Horse' mentioned in Revelations; Verses 19-21 speak of both a 'beast' and a 'false prophet' who will war with the horse's rider (ostensibly the Messiah) and be defeated by him by a sword that emerges out of the rider's mouth. All's fair in love and weirdness as some may say, but who are these beasts and false prophets running around all over the place? For that we must turn to Revelations 13 (of course, which other number would work?) to find out all about the Beast and the infamous '666' number. Yup, it's our old friend the Anti-Christ.

Now if Sai Baba is identifying himself as the rider on the white horse mentioned in the Bible, what does it mean to suggest that he will be responsible for the killing of the Anti-Christ? What does it say about Sai Baba's leanings towards Fundamentalist Christianity? What does it say about Sai Baa-baa's apparent endorsement of mythical and devilish figures? What does it say about Sai BlahBlah's infinite capacity to talk crap?

In any case, isn't it ironic how Sai Baba is viewed in some quarters as being the Anti-Christ incarnate? With all his relentless self-flattery about being the very same God who sent Jesus Christ, he can't even get his story straight about that. Constant confusion is par for the course with this Baba, and it was one of the reasons why I felt unable to continue following him in good conscience. Sai Baba could perhaps redeem himself and return to his former glory as Superbaba again if only he made the effort, bearing in mind that claims to be God or Jesus have lost their novelty when they are made by practically every drunk, drug addict or schizophrenic. There's an idea I'll submit to him for his New Year's Resolutions; Think up some more creative ways to keep a grip on your dwindling followers by re-asserting your godhood and absolute control over their lives. If in doubt, hire a good PR consultant.

Happy Holidays. :-)
Meera Powar  1655
12-24-2006 01:21 PM ET (US)
Everything that he has to say are fetid speculations gleaned from material on Expose sites. His "scathing" response is more like a laughable response, which is why I have not even bothered to respond to it.

Sanjay, I feel you should respond to his allegations. If that is not done,how can we get the truth, I agree that you are able to clearly say that there are a lot of things that are not alright with Sathya sai baba,butdon't you think that we should have more evidence.Of course you are able to demolish the view that people did not know about Shrdi sai baba in puttaparthi area when Sathya Sai Baba was in his teens.
As far as Alhaya rahm is concerrned,both you and joe seem to be in agreement on the fact that the case did not go through because of technical reasons and not because the judiciary found Sathya Sai Baba guilty or not guilty. If this is your (both of you) conclusion,there is no use talking about it.But let me ask you Sanjay,Why is that nobody from the western world or any other foreign country ever come to Delhi to file a case against Sathya Sai Baba? Is there a legal problem??
Tony O'Clery  1654
12-24-2006 11:43 AM ET (US)
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1653
12-24-2006 05:27 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 03-04-2008 10:47 PM
I'm wondering why anti-
Sais are so dumb as to waste their time in a battle where the very suspicious accusers (who are all grown men and obvious liars hiding out unless there are cameras or journalists to kiss their butts and throw them softball questions) won't even lift a finger to fight for themselves. They never consulted a lawyer. They never even tried to file charges. And now they are doing practically nothing to help the "cause" except for lending their name in a useless battle.

Sounds pretty dumb and suspicious to me. I certainly wouldn't waste my time on someone who wasn't willing to put their money and muscle where their mouth is.

Persecutors of Sathya Sai Baba
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1652
12-24-2006 12:12 AM ET (US)
Ah Sanjay, defending your Anti-Sai Friends although they giggle at you and your public exposures behind your back (just like several Middlesex Univerisity Students). You propagate rumors against Sathya Sai Baba that you cannot prove in any way and think this is admirable. Nobody thinks liars are admirable, except Anti-Sai Activists. Hence their admiration of you :-)
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1651
12-24-2006 12:08 AM ET (US)
Yeah, right, Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED")! Do tell us how everyone is taking your words out of context when you gloated yourself that you worked on that article and that Anti-Sai Activists knew of the article "months" before its publication. You even cited a post from a Yahoo Group 6 months before the article as proof that you warned us of the coming newspaper publication in The Guardian. You are a big fat liar and no one believes you.

This is the reason why I don't engage Sangay Dadlani in discussions. All he does is deflect, deny and change the topic (besides garbling like a motormouth ad nauseam).

Sanjay said about The Guardian article, on this forum:
"Want to talk about blindness? I warned you fools about this months ago, but you're way too thick to pick up the hints. I even warned you months in advance about the BBC movie, and you were too thick to pick up the hints about that too. Nothing has changed even two years later. :-)...We already knew about this issue months before the date pf publication of course. In fact it was mooted as a front-page story, but at the last minute a development in a legal issue involving PM Tony Blair took precedence and the Sai Baba article was moved to Page 3. No matter, open the paper and it all goes BOOM! in your face...How did you like the distractions, Moreno? Sorry I couldn't take part while I was busy participating in this development...We run the Exposé and the Exposé continues...And yes, I know all about what has gone on behind the scenes. This is the stuff I am working on while you idiots are arguing endlessly over who's a bigger pervert than who when the biggest pervert of all (Sai Baba) has just been exposed today (Saturday 4th November 2006) in a very nice Page 3 spread in a highbrow British newspaper like The Guardian. Of course, I already know which page it's on even though I don't have it yet."


Paul Lewis' Hidden Bias In The Guardian UK Newspaper

Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1650
12-24-2006 12:08 AM ET (US)
Ha ha ha ha ha, the whole world thinks Bush is a moron. Maybe Gerald will write another page about I have just rubbished "beloved" Bush. LOL.
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1649
12-24-2006 12:06 AM ET (US)
Awww look at Gerald Moreno trying so hard to sound like an expert again. What a shame he cannot defend the indefensible gossip-queening that takes place around Sai Baba. Apparently everyone with any stature who comes to see him is automatically a "devotee", including Steven Seagal of all people. Ha ha ha, unbelievable.

And now Moreno wants to make a case against Afshin having an opinion about some heads of state? LOL, let me inform Moreno that a large proportion of the British Public rubbish the Royal Family, write another website all about that! :-) Unbelievable desperation, castigating Afshin for having an opinion. LOL, I need say no more as Gerald Moreno is fully capable of presenting himself as a fool on the world's stage, as he has been doing for so long already. :-)

Good night. :-)
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1648
12-24-2006 12:03 AM ET (US)
Aww, Sheba comes to back up Solomon. Sahme they don't know that at least two witnesses (Diana Payne and Mark Roche, latter featured in sensational BBC documentary) were prepared to testify in court. Too bad Moreno knows nothing about the court case, except for what his friends in the Sai organisation have told him. :-)

Face it, Sai Baba has just been exposed... again.

Satya Sai Baba caught in British controversy

Indo-Asian News Service

London, December 22, 2006

Satya Sai Baba, one of India's best known spiritual leaders, has triggered a fresh controversy in Britain after association with The Duke of Edinburgh's Award charity involving young people.

The Duke of Edinburgh's Award is a London-headquartered charity whose patron is Prince Philip.

It gives three kinds of awards (bronze, silver and gold) to anyone aged between 14-25 for achievements in four categories: community service, skills, physical recreation and expeditions. Each year it is estimated that over 2,25,000 youngsters vie for the honour in Britain alone.

This year, when the charity celebrates its 50th year, it has chosen to send about 200 young volunteers to India to work with the Sri Satya Sai Organisation.

However, the feat, pulled off by Sai Youth UK, a division of the parent body, has created a furore. Several people, including some of the Satya Sai Baba's former Western disciples, questioned the decision in view of the mixed reputation the godman enjoys. Sai's devotees deny the allegations.

The Guardian was the first to raise its voice saying the award scheme had chosen as its accredited partner a spiritual group "whose 'living god' founder has been accused of sexually abusing young boys".

Satya Sai Baba hit bad press in Britain two years ago when a BBC programme, The Secret Swami, interviewed young Western disciples who alleged that the godman had sexually coerced them.

The Guardian quoted Tom Sackville, a former Home Office minister and chairman of Fair, a cult-watching and victim support group, as saying: "It is appallingly naive for the award scheme to involve young people and the royal family with an organisation whose leader is accused of paedophilia. Parents who plan to send their children on this pilgrimage... should be aware of the danger their children are being exposed to."

The daily also said Michael Gave, a conservative MP, planned to write to the charity to say it should monitor the organisations they chose as partners more strictly.

"As a society we need a more determined effort to identify and expose those religious cults and extremists that pose a direct threat to people, so that they do not enjoy patronage that should be directed elsewhere," he was quoted as saying.

In the 1990s, when Prince Charles visited India, he had expressed a desire to visit the Sai Baba but was quietly dissuaded by the British Embassy in New Delhi.

Since The Guardian's article, it was reported that there was mounting pressure on the charity to distance itself from the Sai group.

However, charity spokesperson Shona Taylor did not answer repeated queries as to whether the volunteers had left for India and how they could be contacted.

- Hindustan Times :-)

Also carried at: KeralaNext.Com, India4u.Com, Nerve.In, IBNLive.Com ("Brit Boys To Keep Off Sai Baba's Reach"), and WorldWide Religious News. :-)
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1647
12-24-2006 12:01 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-24-2006 12:01 AM
When it comes to hearsay and unconfirmed rumors about what Sathya Sai Baba allegedly said about Princess Diana and Prince Charles, Anti-Sai Activists turn into gossip queen and report these rumors like tabloid sensationalists. However, when it comes to Said Afshin Khorramshahgol and his rubbishing (with proof) of the much beloved Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother, Ronald Reagan and all US Presidents as "morons" (Ref), Anti-Sai Activists act deaf and say the discussion is about Sathya Sai Baba and not their perversions, defamations and untruths. Shameless hypocrites.

Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1646
12-23-2006 11:59 PM ET (US)
That's right Moreno, read hidden messages and take my words out of context as you usually do. :-) You are proving to the whole world that your articles are based on nothing but fetid speculations from Expose websites and/or critics' words. Thank you for proving me right. :-) Bear in mind that this is a new article by the Hindustan Times. :-)

And the only reason you are even allowed to post here is because you post on two unmoderated forums. You are thrown out everywhere else (three times in a row from the same forum!) because you are an undisciplined troublemaker who annoys everyone, just as you are doing here. :-)

Sai Baba's name is ruined all over the world now, you just can't get to grips with reality can you?
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1645
12-23-2006 11:37 PM ET (US)
Nice deflection tactic Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED"). Nice to see you are keeping the rumor mill running, all the while failing to provide any verifiable proof to your absurd claims. Notice the pattern?
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1644
12-23-2006 11:34 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 02-28-2008 05:02 AM
/m1639

The anti-Sai "true believers" can only run to journalists to do their bidding and carry on their campaign of lies. Apparently they can't even find an atheist lawyer (advocate) in India to help them file charges! I wonder why.

Too funny.

And Sanjay's head is getting so big I'm surprised he can fit through the door..."We run the expose and the expose continues."

Too funny (roll eyes).

What a wannabe nerd. The only thing Sanjay is good at is running his mouth like he has diarrhea.
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1643
12-23-2006 11:34 PM ET (US)
More pathological lies from Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED"). If other witnesses were going to be called, they would have had to be identified to the court for cross examination and obtaining depositions. NO witnesses were identified to the court on Alaya Rahm's behalf and neither Sanjay Dadlani or any other Anti-Sai Activist can provide even one single court record that supports their erroneous claims that witnesses for Alaya Rahm were going to be called.

Of course, these are the same people who claimed that Kreydick's deposition was not part of the official court record until I proved them wrong....again.

Yawn on that Sanjay.

* Alaya Rahm Self-Dismissed His Own Lawsuit Against The Sathya Sai Baba Society

* A Scathing Response To Critics About Alaya Rahm's Failed Lawsuit

Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1642
12-23-2006 11:30 PM ET (US)
In the meantime, suck on this:

"In the 1990s, when Prince Charles visited India, he had expressed a desire to visit the Sai Baba but was quietly dissuaded by the British Embassy in New Delhi."

Gee I wonder why? Maybe it had something to do with this. :-)
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1641
12-23-2006 11:27 PM ET (US)
Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED") everyone knows why you are gloating over the press received about The Guardian article. You were the one who boasted that you were directly involved with it and predicted its publication 6 months before it came out!

Paul Lewis' Hidden Bias In The Guardian UK Newspaper

Sanjay said about this article, on this forum:
"Want to talk about blindness? I warned you fools about this months ago, but you're way too thick to pick up the hints. I even warned you months in advance about the BBC movie, and you were too thick to pick up the hints about that too. Nothing has changed even two years later. :-)...We already knew about this issue months before the date pf publication of course. In fact it was mooted as a front-page story, but at the last minute a development in a legal issue involving PM Tony Blair took precedence and the Sai Baba article was moved to Page 3. No matter, open the paper and it all goes BOOM! in your face...How did you like the distractions, Moreno? Sorry I couldn't take part while I was busy participating in this development...We run the Exposé and the Exposé continues...And yes, I know all about what has gone on behind the scenes. This is the stuff I am working on while you idiots are arguing endlessly over who's a bigger pervert than who when the biggest pervert of all (Sai Baba) has just been exposed today (Saturday 4th November 2006) in a very nice Page 3 spread in a highbrow British newspaper like The Guardian. Of course, I already know which page it's on even though I don't have it yet."

Of course, now Sanjay is attempting to say that he wasn't as involved as he formerly claimed he was. More feet in mouth :-)

Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1640
12-23-2006 11:25 PM ET (US)
Yawn. As I said before, Joe108 knows nothing about the legal case. The full explanation (complete with information from the Rahm's lawyer, is contained here.

More lies as usual, several witnesses were going to be called. Too bad Joe108 didn't know about it, he knows nothing. :-)
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1639
12-23-2006 11:15 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-23-2006 11:20 PM
Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED") said, "The case "failed" because it wasn't legally possible to sue Sai Baba and/or his organisation in America". Amen. Finally got your information right. But what you forget to tell everyone is that Alaya Rahm's lawyer not only accepted the case, he pursued it for 16 months only to conclude that the Society was a bookstore and could not be sued!

Alaya attempted to sue Goldstein and failed. Alaya attempted to sue Sathya Sai Baba (in the wrong country) and failed. Alaya's last ditch effort was to sue the Society (in the wrong country) and failed. Not even one single witness came forward to defend Alaya or support him in any way. Not even one other alleged victim! Instead of wasting so much time in America filing useless court cases, the Rahm's should have filed a court case in India (which would have generated immense publicity). Too late, they dismissed their case "with prejudice"!

The only reason why Anti-Sai Activists have not responded to my scathing response is because they have already stuck all their feet in their mouths and can't find any more room to stick more feet in! Of course, Sanjay will spin everything with his typical garrulous replies and deflection tactics and repeat his monotoned rhetoric like a brainless automaton (no surprise there).

This whole issue has been nothing less than a total embarrassment for the Anti-Sai Movement. If you listen carefully, you can hear them sobbing amidst the gnashing of their teeth :-)

* Alaya Rahm Self-Dismissed His Own Lawsuit Against The Sathya Sai Baba Society
* A Scathing Response To Critics About Alaya Rahm's Failed Lawsuit

Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1638
12-23-2006 11:01 PM ET (US)

Satya Sai Baba caught in British controversy

Indo-Asian News Service

London, December 22, 2006

Satya Sai Baba, one of India's best known spiritual leaders, has triggered a fresh controversy in Britain after association with The Duke of Edinburgh's Award charity involving young people.

The Duke of Edinburgh's Award is a London-headquartered charity whose patron is Prince Philip.

It gives three kinds of awards (bronze, silver and gold) to anyone aged between 14-25 for achievements in four categories: community service, skills, physical recreation and expeditions. Each year it is estimated that over 2,25,000 youngsters vie for the honour in Britain alone.

This year, when the charity celebrates its 50th year, it has chosen to send about 200 young volunteers to India to work with the Sri Satya Sai Organisation.

However, the feat, pulled off by Sai Youth UK, a division of the parent body, has created a furore. Several people, including some of the Satya Sai Baba's former Western disciples, questioned the decision in view of the mixed reputation the godman enjoys. Sai's devotees deny the allegations.

The Guardian was the first to raise its voice saying the award scheme had chosen as its accredited partner a spiritual group "whose 'living god' founder has been accused of sexually abusing young boys".

Satya Sai Baba hit bad press in Britain two years ago when a BBC programme, The Secret Swami, interviewed young Western disciples who alleged that the godman had sexually coerced them.

The Guardian quoted Tom Sackville, a former Home Office minister and chairman of Fair, a cult-watching and victim support group, as saying: "It is appallingly naive for the award scheme to involve young people and the royal family with an organisation whose leader is accused of paedophilia. Parents who plan to send their children on this pilgrimage... should be aware of the danger their children are being exposed to."

The daily also said Michael Gave, a conservative MP, planned to write to the charity to say it should monitor the organisations they chose as partners more strictly.

"As a society we need a more determined effort to identify and expose those religious cults and extremists that pose a direct threat to people, so that they do not enjoy patronage that should be directed elsewhere," he was quoted as saying.

In the 1990s, when Prince Charles visited India, he had expressed a desire to visit the Sai Baba but was quietly dissuaded by the British Embassy in New Delhi.

Since The Guardian's article, it was reported that there was mounting pressure on the charity to distance itself from the Sai group.

However, charity spokesperson Shona Taylor did not answer repeated queries as to whether the volunteers had left for India and how they could be contacted.

- Hindustan Times :-)

Also carried at: KeralaNext.Com, India4u.Com, Nerve.In, IBNLive.Com ("Brit Boys To Keep Off Sai Baba's Reach"), and WorldWide Religious News. :-)

Yes indeed, a very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you too Meera. :-)
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1637
12-23-2006 10:55 PM ET (US)
Meera, please don't forget that Joe108 has no information about anything in the Sathya Sai Baba controversy. Everything that he has to say are fetid speculations gleaned from material on Expose sites. His "scathing" response is more like a laughable response, which is why I have not even bothered to respond to it. The Sai Organisation are also putting out disinformation (in their RadioSai magazine) to bolster the devotees to believe their own story.

The case "failed" because it wasn't legally possible to sue Sai Baba and/or his organisation in America, it's as simple as that. The Rahm's lawyer specifically outlined what it would take to convict Sai Baba/Organisation, a legal process that would take far too long during which the Baba might kick the bucket as he is already too old and weak and is not expected to live for too long. That's all.
Meera  1636
12-23-2006 08:24 PM ET (US)
I Wish you all a Happy and Merry Christmas.
Meera  1635
12-23-2006 08:18 PM ET (US)
Alaya Rahm Self-Dismissed His Own Lawsuit Against The Sathya Sai Baba Society

This message by joe is quite convincing.It looks like Alahya Rahm did nothing to prove his case against Sathya Sai Baba.It looks as though money
was his motivation. I am sure,there are provisions in the U.S law which
can at the least send a judicial order or something like that to Sathya Sai Baba.This would have proved that Alaya was really trying to prove something.
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1634
12-23-2006 08:14 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-23-2006 08:17 PM
/m1632

You've been shown the truth Usedbybaba and you continue to lie about it. No honest WOMAN would look at the perversities you have been shown regarding saibabaexposed and O'Clery and act so blase about it. The fact that you could care less about their vulgarity and lies reveals who you are (a man who is a PERVERT).
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1633
12-23-2006 08:13 PM ET (US)
/m1624

No, Tony, you didn't "just" write on the Ireland Uncensored board. Once again, you are not telling the truth.
Meera  1632
12-23-2006 08:04 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-23-2006 08:12 PM
As you can see sb devotees are very dishonest

All devotees are not dishonest.I told you of my neighbours, who are very nice people.

You are saying that youare not racial.I believe you for the present. Ofcourse if they have proof and if they furnish it,I have to change my idea.I hope you are what you say and you seem sincere.
Tony O'Clery.  1631
12-23-2006 04:41 PM ET (US)
Meera wrote."Tony are you saying she is wrong? Then on what basis is lisa and others writing that you are a racial peorson? My question is did you ever visit the web site that was mentioned. What was your role or did you ever see this site before they accused you of racialism."

I had never seen the site before joe moreno was posting it all over the place. As you can see sb devotees are very dishonest, they cannot answer the charges against sb so the attack us.
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  1630
12-23-2006 02:49 PM ET (US)
sure you are.
Meera Powar  1629
12-23-2006 01:40 PM ET (US)
usedbybaba, why are you posting as Meera?

Angel,I am Meera Powar posting as Meera.
Meera Powar  1628
12-23-2006 01:38 PM ET (US)
lisa wrote<<<<<<<<Tony, we have proof of you posting on many Irish message boards. You're not fooling anyone with a brain.........>>>>>>>>>

Tony are you saying she is wrong? Then on what basis is lisa and others writing that you are a racial peorson? My question is did you ever visit the web site that was mentioned. What was your role or did you ever see this site before they accused you of racialism. I saw the site and was surprised to see such a site legally running. Maybe some white people are feeling that their space as so called supirior people is being taken over by others.
This sort of hatred for a community exists all over the world.Shirdi baba's main objective was to bring Muslims and Hindus together.Even now the hatered between these communities are pretty high in our state.
Meera Powar  1627
12-23-2006 01:25 PM ET (US)

* Alaya Rahm Self-Dismissed His Own Lawsuit Against The Sathya Sai Baba Society
* A Scathing Response To Critics About Alaya Rahm's Failed Lawsuit

You seem to be making a point that Alaya rahm was greedy for money and so the case,even if it was true,failed.
How come there are abosolutely two different views? both yours and Sanjay's are too long for me to patiently read through. If there are just a few points, it would be easy to understand. We are lay people,so long elaborate web pages are actually confusing.
One thing that I understood is,both of you are giving totally different views for why this case was dismissed. You say it was his greed and Sanjay says it was because Sathya sai baba is inIndia?
I don't know whom to believe.
Tony O'Clery.  1626
12-23-2006 11:40 AM ET (US)
Namaste,

Rishis, Sages, Muktas, Amsa Avatars, Avatars, Karana Janmas,
Bhodisattvas are for ALL. Jesus's appearance was a blessed event.

So a Happy and Merry Christmas to ALL...Love Tony.
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1625
12-23-2006 11:33 AM ET (US)
Tony O'Clery.  1624
12-23-2006 11:32 AM ET (US)
lisa wrote<<<<<<<<Tony, we have proof of you posting on many Irish message boards. You're not fooling anyone with a brain.........>>>>>>>>>

I actually only wrote on the ireland uncensored board which is now defunct, most on there were either loyalists or nationalists. I was really neither but was not a loyalist orange order member that's for sure.
I'm not a racist by any means, as my membership in the early anti apartheid movement would indicate. I also have an adopted Indian brother and sister.My family is much intermarried with other races etc. Racism is an easy charge for me to refute. I'm a Democratic Socialist of sorts and was a member of various socialist parties in my time.So I am hardly a white power nut.

If you really want to see how I think. go to my webpage..
http://www.geocities.com/aoclery

If you click on politico conspiracy files you will see my 'New Constitution'.
AngelicPerson was signed in when posted  1623
12-23-2006 07:47 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-23-2006 10:00 AM
usedbybaba, why are you posting as Meera?
Meera Powar  1622
12-23-2006 07:10 AM ET (US)
Tony, we have proof of you posting on many Irish message boards. You're not fooling anyone with a brain.

Can I request co2000 to give me the same.
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1621
12-23-2006 07:01 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-23-2006 07:01 AM
You're nothing but an abusive game player usedcrybaby. Anybody with brains can see you for the demented fool you are from a thousand miles away. Get some help before you end up in jail.
Meera Powar  1620
12-23-2006 06:56 AM ET (US)
/m1615
This is too big. I am speaking of the article about the cas against
Sathya sai. From what tony wrote and from what I read in your article,I can make out that that according to you both, Sathya Sai Baba should be in
West or U.S to be prosecuted. I am sure there must be a provision to send a notice to anyone anwhere in the world. Why such a provision if available has not been used.

I also wonder how Sathya Sai baba is having such a large following.
Meera Powar  1619
12-23-2006 06:44 AM ET (US)
I am Meera Powar from Matunga in Mumbai. I am not anyone else.We are basically from Maharashtra and have been devotees of Sai Baba of shirdi.
I am a woman with 2 children.My husband is working in a private firm as a Sales Manager. If co2000 is not interested in answering my questions, no problem. I am here as a devotee of Shirdi Baba and I hope this is not wrong.I would be very happy to know whether Sathya Sai baba is the incarnation of Shirdi Sai.My neighbours,Mohan Athre and his wife Priya are devotees of Sathya sai baba. This aroused my curiosity. If someone finds my questions wrong they can tell me. I am neither used nor un used by baba.
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1618
12-23-2006 04:40 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-23-2006 06:55 AM
MEERA = USEDBYBABA = USEDCRYBABY

The mind games with usedcrybaby never end.
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1617
12-22-2006 11:32 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-23-2006 04:38 AM
/m1611

Are you really this dumb Tony?

It is oh so obvious Alaya Rahm LIED when he said the Society was involved in paying for his trip to India (just like he lied about having witnesses who would testify on his behalf) because Kreydick paid for his ticket!

Like I said, it doesn't surprise me that a liar like you would side with all the other liars. Just like you are blind to your own sexual perversions, you are blind to your own lies.

Better straighten your perverted act out Tony. Your past is catching up with you in more ways than one.
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1616
12-22-2006 11:24 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-22-2006 11:27 PM
/m1612

Tony, we have proof of you posting on many Irish message boards. You're not fooling anyone with a brain.

And please stop talking like the disgusting pervert you are. Just shows once again what a weirdo you are.
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1615
12-22-2006 10:27 PM ET (US)
Meera, for your question about the legal case, it has all been answered here. Happy reading! :-)
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1614
12-22-2006 10:24 PM ET (US)
By the way, I forgot to mention that the famous B.V. Narasimha Swamiji (Shirdi Sai amabassador) met Sathya and analysed his claims. Obviously Sathya did not deserve much attention despite all the little "miracles" he was doing, and the Shirdi Sansthan accept that there is no need for a reincarnation since Shirdi Sai Baba's grace is apparently still available from his tomb, according to the reports and experiences of devotees and even Shirdi's own words.

Shirdi himself stated in many places that after his death he would still be active from his tomb, answering prayers and whatnot. So, what need for a reincarnation?

I'd also like to thank you for recognising the uselessness of Joe108 and CO2000 right off the bat. You are seeing first-hand their utter incapability of presenting a rational argument in discussion, and their pre-eminent strategy solely consists of personal attacks that have no meaning. They are angry that they are incapable of defending Sathya and simply choose to abuse us instead.
Sai Baba EXPOSED!Person was signed in when posted  1613
12-22-2006 10:18 PM ET (US)
Ha ha, if Joe is attempting to "convict" Tony because his writing was posted on a White Power site, then we can convict Lisa De Witt for the fact that her writings were posted on various pro-marijuana groups. :-)

Meera, I am not against Shirdi Sai baba as I have a very great respect for him. In fact I first heard of him after watching the famous movie starring Sudheer Dalavi and I visited Shirdi in 1990. Re your question about my article, the thing that we have to remember is that reincarnation itself cannot be scientifically proven. If anybody wants to believe that Sathya Sai is the reincarnation of Shirdi Sai, that is their faith and their own belief.

My angle is that some basic history about Sathya Sai should be known; he rose to fam after shamelessly arrogating the name and fame of Shirdi Sai Baba. If you speak to any Sathya devotee or read any books about Sathya, you will find that his claims of reincarnation are taken for granted. According to the official story, he announced it literally out of the blue and even confirmed his "identity" with Shirdi Sai in print to a media journalist. There are lots of "facts" that "prove" how Sathya is Shirdi's reincarnation so much so that it is taken for granted.

But thanks to new information (as per my articles), we have just discovered that Sathya was a liar. We are expected to believe (from official sourceS) that no one in Sathya's area had even heard of Shirdi Baba much less know who he was. What we know now is that Shirdi Sai Baba was not only well known in the area, but that young Sathya was a devotee of Shirdi Baba! Two of his uncles were confirmed devotees, and Sathya himself regularly attended Shirdi bhajans at the house of relatives and friends. When there are such glaring discrepancies between the facts and the 'official' version, how can we take his claims of reincarnation seriously? He is a liar, plain and simple.

What would have been the harm if Sathya's biographers had included this information in their books? They specifically chose to cover it up despite the fact that many of Sathya's contemporaries may well have testified. They did this to trim down the story and inculcate a myth. Sathya's fame has grown from there, declaring himself as the reincarnation of Shirdi Sai Baba at a time when there were many such "reincarnations". Sathya was not doing anything unusual or unique, a lot of people were claiming to be Shirdi's reincarnation. Apparently this didn't satisfy him, because soon enough he was claiming to be G-O-D, an avatar walking the earth.

I just feel sorry for the people who believe all this rubbish. I believed it, but now mine eyes hath seen the light.
Tony O'Clery  1612
12-22-2006 04:13 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-22-2006 04:37 PM
I have been accused by jose geraldo mentira moreno or joe 108, of writing on an Irish White Power site. This is not true but they did quote some of my writing on pro secularism. Why they quoted me I'm not sure, considering it was anti sectarian.

Joes says I am cas but the bio doesn't fit me or my parents. I don't live in Ireland and wasn't born there. It is just another fabrication from the followers of sathya fudgepacker.

Here is a url to a BBC report on human rights in Asia being affected by weak legal systems.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20061222/wl_as...rights_061222081957
Tony O'Clery  1611
12-22-2006 04:09 PM ET (US)
The difficulty of Al Rahm's suit was that there was really nobody to sue, no consistent legal entity. sb lives in India and is too petrified to come to the west in case the affidavits are served on him. As you know anyone with money or influence would not be prosecuted in India. It was really as simple as that.
Meera  1610
12-22-2006 03:14 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-22-2006 03:15 PM
I hope nobody is against Shirdi Baba.It is believed that if some on wants his desires fulfilled,he/she should read Sai Satcharitha atlesat three times without a gap. His/Her desires will be fulcilled for sure.I have experience of this.
meera  1609
12-22-2006 03:10 PM ET (US)
sanjay you say 'And more lies about the Alaya Rahm court case; it "flopped" for very good legal reasons and not at all why the unauthorised SB-defenders are saying."

What legal reasons??
CO2000Person was signed in when posted  1608
12-22-2006 02:37 PM ET (US)
I see Tony has found another warped playmate in usedbyaba aka usedcrybaby. Ah, the freakzoids just can't stop playing their sicko mind games can they? Pathetic isn't it? They all belong in the looney bin. Perverts everyone of them.
Meera  1607
12-22-2006 02:11 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 12-22-2006 02:14 PM
In Defence Of Sathya Sai Baba
Damage Control Kicks Into High Gear
Blog Index Of Articles This Month
The Truth About Vir Sanghvi
Sanjay Worships Pink, Girly & Gay Gods
Sanjay Rekindling His Love For Sathya Sai Baba
Bhaktivedanta Manor, Sanjay Dadlani And 3G
Sanjay's Disgusting Feces Obsession
Sanjay's "Stalking" Paranoia
Sanjay's "Direct Experience" Of Sathya Sai Baba's Godhood

Joe 108.I am not able to understand what way these are about Sathya sai Baba,except the last one.

On vir sangvi you have said he is wrong on calling the 2006 birth day of baba as his 80th.I wonder how it matters.

I did not read these :
Sanjay Worships Pink, Girly & Gay Gods
Sanjay Rekindling His Love For Sathya Sai Baba
Bhaktivedanta Manor, Sanjay Dadlani And 3G
Sanjay's Disgusting Feces Obsession
Sanjay's "Stalking" Paranoia

because they are in no way connceted to baba.If they are related to baba please mention

You wrote about usedbybaba as follows:

Apparently, "usedbybaba" can't make up his mind whether students he claimed he personally knew truly suffered or "seemed" to suffer. He also can't make up his mind if he was really abused by Baba or if he simply "shuddered" at the thought of being abused by Baba. "UsedByBaba" said on the Quicktopic forum:

"Some students seem to have suffered a lot.I shudder the thought of being molested by senior students and also by baba. I would have gone bonkers."

We have to ask 'usedbybaba', what he meant by this

I did read about Tony being involved in racialism,but I did not see his name.Did he write in any other name? Is there any proof? If it is true,It is not good.
Meera  1606
12-22-2006 01:29 PM ET (US)


Sathya Sai Baba has never been proven to be a "charlatan".

Sathya Sai Baba has never been convicted of any crime.

Sathya Sai Baba has never been charged with any crime.

Sathya Sai Baba has never had even one single complaint lodged against him by any alleged victim, first-hand, in India. As a matter of fact, not even one alleged victim has even tried to file a basic police complaint or court case against Sathya Sai Baba in India (the only place where courts would have jurisdiction over Baba as an individual defendent).

In India,MONEY = JUSTICE.So we cannot take this route.Till the 80s there were smugglers and gangsters running Bombay.Even now,big organisations(it maybe (political,business,religious or any other)can get people killed. Please read a lot about India.
Meera  1605
12-22-2006 01:19 PM ET (US)
Marquis de Sade /m1603 This is sick.
Joe108Person was signed in when posted  1604
12-22-2006 12:37 PM ET (US)
Marquis de Sade  1603
12-22-2006 12:21 PM ET (US)
"Father," my sister said most imprudently, "we thank you for your proposal. But at our age we have no inclination to have ourselves locked up in a cloister in order to be whores for priests, we’ve had enough of that already."

The Superior renewed his arguments, he spoke with a heat and energy which illustrated his powerful desire to have the thing succeed; finally observing that it was destined to fail, he hurled himself almost in a fury upon my sister.

"Very well, little whore," he cried, "at least satisfy me once again before I take my leave."

And unbuttoning his breeches, he got astride her; she offered no resistance, persuaded that by allowing him to have his way she’d be rid of him all the sooner. And the smutty fellow, pinning her between his knees, began to brandish and then to abuse a tough and rather stout engine, advancing it to within a quarter of an inch of my sister’s face.

"Pretty face," he gasped, "pretty little whore’s face, how I’ll soak it in my fuck, by sweet Jesus!"

And therewith the sluices opened, the sperm flew out, and the entirety of my sister’s face, especially her nose and mouth, were covered with evidence of our visitor’s libertinage, whose passion might not have been so cheaply satisfied had his design in coming to us met with success. More complacent now, the man of God’s only thoughts were of escape; after having flung a crown upon the table and relit his lantern:

"You little fools, you are little tramps," he told us. "You are ruining your chances in this world; may Heaven punish your folly by causing you to fall on evil days, and may I have the pleasure of seeing you in misery; that would be my revenge, that is what I wish you."

My sister, busy wiping her face, paid him back his stupidities in kind, and, our door shutting behind the Superior, we spent the remainder of the night in peace.

"You’ve just seen one of his favorite stunts," said my sister. "He’s mad about discharging in girls’ faces. If he only confined himself to that... but the scoundrel has a good many other eccentricities, and some of them are so dangerous that I do indeed fear..."

But my sister was sleepy, she dozed off without completing her sentence, and the morrow bringing fresh adventures with it, we gave no more thought to that one.
Meera  1602
12-22-2006 07:33 AM ET (US)
Lisa,I want to know more about Sathya Sai Baba.If you keep abusing people ,where would we get to the truth.I would like to believe that Sathya sai and Shirdi sai are one and the same,but you are not putting up any point to discuss this.What is the point? I feel that as a Devotee of Shirdi Baba, I want to know more of Sathya Sai. Please help me prove that Sathya Sai baba is an incarnation of Shirdi baba,though I do not know what exactly is the fact. I have copied so many abuses in your mails. Why are you so angry. Sanjay and others would have abused,but is it worth following. Don't we have the proof to prove him wrong. Why should we be afraid. The follwing is just from a few messages of yours. Can we talk sense here.

"the dork
Get over it crybaby. Go whine to your mommy
childish drooling
go see a shrink
your cowardly accusers are ALL grown men who are LIARS
bozo.
ignoramus.
you are too dumb
Your journalists are flunkies
what liars you guys are
naive journalists look like fools
obsessive hysteria and lies
your idiocy is exposed
dumbo
yours is nothing but ad hominem hypocrisy.
You are pathetic.
You are projecting your own garbage
A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR
drugs, alcohol or both that enable so many of you conscienceless dregs.
abusive behavior, lies and PERVERSIONS
it's none of your business pervert
so you are a LYING pervert.
It's NONE of your business PERVERT
Tony baloney
your racist-sounding drivel betrays
You need to see a shrink
immature adolescent who just can't grow up
Mind your own business pervert before you end up in jail"
Meera  1601
12-22-2006 07:11 AM ET (US)
Sanjay,I understand that you are trying to say that people in and around Puttaparthi knew of Shirdi baba,much before Sathya saibaba declared himself to be a reincarnation of Shirdi Baba.You maybe right, but how does it prove that Sathya sai is not Shirdi sai? Nor does it prove otherwise.
RSS link What's this?
   << 1700-1715  1601-1699 of 2980  1585-1600 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.