Edited by author 12-26-2006 01:08 AM
A thought just occurred to me. I was thinking how the original The Guardian Article About Sathya Sai Baba was duplicated in about 5 other media sources. A month and a half later, the newer circulating version has been duplicated in over a dozen (and counting) media sources.

Ironic enough, one and half months later and my article about The British Controversy, Paul Lewis And The Anti-Sai Hackjob is well situated in Google's ranking. This means, of course, that those who are truly interested in this matter will research it and will find my high-ranking webpage about it :-)

To verify this, I just looked at my site stats and they are up 65%, all directly related to Paul Lewis and Vir Sanghvi. This is actually a stroke of good luck! The timing could not have been more perfect. As Sanjay would say, "WOW!" lol

Funny Sanjay, everytime I try to talk about the issues, you resort to the same venomous slop of distractions, deflections and unreasonable arguments. There is no rationalizing with you. The hypocrisy of it all is that you are a fully exosed pervert and pathological liar. Everyone is still waiting for you to expose me with you "proof" that I posted on teen-porn sites. I have confronted you with this numerous times and you ignore it. You claim you have proof that could ruin my integrity and yet you continue to withhold your alleged proof. You are a big fat liar, with proof. You are unbelievable and no one believes you. No one can believe a liar.

And despite all these mentions to the recent Guardian article, not even one single journalist can verify even one single claim of "pedophilia". Now that is sand to bury you head in!

• Sanjay Dadlani Exposed: /m272 /m1099
  "Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed




• "Usedbybaba" Exposed




• Barbara Dent Exposed




• Anthony "Tony" O'Clery Exposed



• Exposing The Lies, Deceit & Dishonesty Of Critics, Skeptics And Ex-Devotees Of Sathya Sai Baba: SaiSathyaSai.com"

Edited by author 12-25-2006 10:45 PM
The recent Guardian/DNA/Hindustan Times article has been published further in the Times of India and Zee News. "Flunky" journalism? That's right, bury your heads even deeper in the sand and keep telling yourself that. It's all downhill for Sai Baba from here. :-)

Remember, Sai Baba himself regards the Times of India as a good newspaper, which he himself reads every day. I guess he won't object to their reporting of this controversy about him, why should he? It is a good newspaper according to him. :-)

BREAKING NEWS: Sai Baba spoke about Idi Amin in his Xmas discourse. This'll be fun. :-)

What off-wiki attacks? What anonymous usernames? What racism comments coming from a racist? If Gerald wants to avoid the issues as he usually does and attack me instead, tough luck as everyone can see how pathetic it is. We have to remember that neither Lisa or Gerald have the guts to confirm and fully clarify their status regarding Sai Baba, whether they are devotees or not. Even if they do clarify it, it won't matter because true Sai devotees are genuinely a bunch of nice folk who would spit in Gerald and Lisa's faces out of disgust for their abuse, and pathetic "representation" of Sathya Sai Baba. Now he is threatening to "push his POV" on Wikipedia, when everyone including several admin are already annoyed with him for his bad behaviour and a pending ArbCom canse.

How ironic that Sai Baba is "defended" by a couple of lamebrains who do not even believ ein him? LOL.

Kristijan, then explain the identity of the beast and the false prophet? If you want to contend that Sai Baba is predicted in Revelations then you will have to answer to the other things the Bible says about the "Rider of the White Horse". So has Sathya Sai Baba advented to kill the Anti-Christ in an apocalyptic battle or not? Do you even realise how insane this fundamentalist Armageddon nonsense sounds to a realist? :-)

Edited by author 12-26-2006 01:44 AM
/m1660

Dadlani the hypocrite, all of your attacks are off-wiki attacks except for the time you created an anonymous username (Ekantik) and tried to play your sociopathic mind games on wikipedia.

Edited by author 02-28-2008 04:51 AM
All of this babble from the anti-Sais is just a device to distract from the fact that they have been caught in their lies about Baba being a pedophile. All of the grown men who claimed to have been sexually abused were trying to hide behide the cloak of child molestation and once that was unveiled for the lie that it was, their credibility went down the drain.

The anti-Sais are left, once again, to babble on the internet and coerce flunky journalists into their web of continuing and very racist-smelling deceit.


Persecutors of Sathya Sai Baba

Edited by author 12-25-2006 04:07 PM
/m1662
"EVery prophecy that sb has said about himself has been proven to be distorted or downright lies. Everyone has been refuted and proven so. From Aurobindo and Mohammed all the way to the Revelations. Revelations is esoteric anyway and is about internal battles and processes such as Kundalini etc."
______________

say what you want, but either way ,it is weird that so many things said in Revelations fit SB's appearance.It's not just one,but a few.It probably bugs you a bit.

stuff like this....



"called Faithful and True...Eyes like fire and on his head are many crowns"
(his birth name is Sathya ...i said few days ago,there's something weird going on with his eyes at moments ,his gaze from some angle at times is unnatural and his hair does look like a crown ,sorta )
 


"He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God."
(he sometimes wears that cherry red robe,his name is the word of God...the Truth,maybe???)


"The armies of heaven were following him dressed in fine linen, white and clean"
(his devotees are dressed that way)


"Out of his mouth comes"
(lingam ...)

Funny, despite all these allegations of "pedophilia", not even one critic, skeptic, rationalist, journalist or media can verify even one single instance of pedophilia against Sathya Sai Baba! Anti-Sai's love to boast about all the media that has spoken against Sathya Sai Baba. Despite all these media organizations and journalists investigating and reporting the issue for 6 years, no one can confirm even one single case of paedophilia. Gee, I wonder why? Oh, I forgot, Anti-Sai's are keeping that information "secret". Pathetic.

• Sanjay Dadlani Exposed: /m272 /m1099
  "Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed




• "Usedbybaba" Exposed




• Barbara Dent Exposed




• Anthony "Tony" O'Clery Exposed



• Exposing The Lies, Deceit & Dishonesty Of Critics, Skeptics And Ex-Devotees Of Sathya Sai Baba: SaiSathyaSai.com"

Too funny! Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED", aka "Gaurasundara", aka "Dark Knight", aka "Azra`iL") is now complaining about "off wiki personal attacks" when he has done nothing but attack me and others during all this time! lol

Sanjay, your denial won't put others in denail. You are a pervert, pathological liar and deceiver with proof. A position I am perfectly ready to defend on Wikipedia if you want to push the issue :-)

Since you reposted your former comments, I will repost mine:

- Sanjay & Gomorrah: Dadlani's Jesus Sex Fetish
- Sanjay's Requests For Pornographic Material

Sanjay's discoursing on Jesus and the Bible is akin to a prostitute discoursing on abstinence.

All that can be said about Sanjay's arguments is that he is consistently inconsistent and critically hypocritical. This is the guy who Anti-Sai Activists endorse, promote and fully associate themselves with. For shame!

• Sanjay Dadlani Exposed: /m272 /m1099
  "Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed




• "Usedbybaba" Exposed




• Barbara Dent Exposed




• Anthony "Tony" O'Clery Exposed



• Exposing The Lies, Deceit & Dishonesty Of Critics, Skeptics And Ex-Devotees Of Sathya Sai Baba: SaiSathyaSai.com"

EVery prophecy that sb has said about himself has been proven to be distorted or downright lies. Everyone has been refuted and proven so. From Aurobindo and Mohammed all the way to the Revelations. Revelations is esoteric anyway and is about internal battles and processes such as Kundalini etc.

"I saw heaven standing open and there before me was a white horse, whose rider is called Faithful and True. With justice he judges and makes war. His eyes are like blazing fire, and on his head are many crowns. He has a name written on him that no one knows but he himself. He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God. The armies of heaven were following him, riding on white horses and dressed in fine linen, white and clean. Out of his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations. 'He will rule them with an iron scepter.' He treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty. On his robe and on his thigh he has this name written:

'KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.'"


______

that's weird

More off-Wiki attacks that expose Gerald Moreno (SSS108) as an ad-hominem attacker who is pathologically unable to address the issues regarding Sathya Sai Baba and simply resorts to ad-hominem personal attacks instead. That too on Christmas Day. Merry Christmas Gerald. :-) Merry Christmas Sai Baba! :-)

--

"I saw heaven standing open and there before me was a white horse, whose rider is called Faithful and True. With justice he judges and makes war. His eyes are like blazing fire, and on his head are many crowns. He has a name written on him that no one knows but he himself. He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God. The armies of heaven were following him, riding on white horses and dressed in fine linen, white and clean. Out of his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations. 'He will rule them with an iron scepter.' He treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty. On his robe and on his thigh he has this name written:

'KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.'"

Sound familiar? Yes, that's from the Bible, Revelations 19.11-16 to be precise. This is a staple of Sai literature by way of their incorrigible attempts to prove that Sathya Sai Baba is the Messiah and his coming was foretold in acient scriptures. Without complicating the present issue, we may also observe that such claims of messiahship extend to other religions besides Christianity.

I say incorrigible because history bears witness to the justification of the vilest acts that were legitimised by the twisting of scripture. Irregardless of the intent of Revelations 19, Sai devotees interpret all of the scriptural qualities as being present in the person of Sai Baba, not least the fact that the Baba himself is responsible for this. Let us take a look at his own words of Christmas Day, 1972:

"There is one point that I cannot but bring to your special notice today. At the moment when Jesus was merging in the Supreme Principle of Divinity, He communicated some news to his followers ... The statement itself has been manipulated and tangled into a conundrum. The statement of Christ is simple: 'He who sent me among you will come again!' and he pointed to a Lamb. The Lamb is merely a symbol, a sign. It stands for the Voice - Ba-Ba; the announcement was the Advent of Baba. 'His Name will be Truth,' Christ declared. Sathya means Truth. 'He will wear a robe of red, a bloodred robe.' (Here Baba pointed to the robe He was wearing!). 'He will be short, with a crown (of hair). The Lamb is the sign and symbol of Love.' Christ did not declare that he will come again. He said, 'He who made me will come again.' That Ba-ba is this Baba and Sai, the short, curly-hair-crowned red-robed Baba, is come."

No, there is no use rubbing your eyes in disbelief, he really did say that in front of a packed crowd of Westerners on Christmas Day. Talk about seizing opportunities, just check out the way that he is not content with declaring himself the Messiah (Christ come again) but insists upon being recognised as GOD, He who supposedly <i>sent</ipan> Christ into the world.

One thing that I absolutely love about Sai devotees is the way they manage to take everything completely out of context while keeping a straight face. By this I am referring to the 'Rider of the White Horse' mentioned in Revelations; Verses 19-21 speak of both a 'beast' and a 'false prophet' who will war with the horse's rider (ostensibly the Messiah) and be defeated by him by a sword that emerges out of the rider's mouth. All's fair in love and weirdness as some may say, but who are these beasts and false prophets running around all over the place? For that we must turn to Revelations 13 (of course, which other number would work?) to find out all about the Beast and the infamous '666' number. Yup, it's our old friend the Anti-Christ.

Now if Sai Baba is identifying himself as the rider on the white horse mentioned in the Bible, what does it mean to suggest that he will be responsible for the killing of the Anti-Christ? What does it say about Sai Baba's leanings towards Fundamentalist Christianity? What does it say about Sai Baa-baa's apparent endorsement of mythical and devilish figures? What does it say about Sai BlahBlah's infinite capacity to talk crap?

In any case, isn't it ironic how Sai Baba is viewed in some quarters as being the Anti-Christ incarnate? With all his relentless self-flattery about being the very same God who sent Jesus Christ, he can't even get his story straight about that. Constant confusion is par for the course with this Baba, and it was one of the reasons why I felt unable to continue following him in good conscience. Sai Baba could perhaps redeem himself and return to his former glory as Superbaba again if only he made the effort, bearing in mind that claims to be God or Jesus have lost their novelty when they are made by practically every drunk, drug addict or schizophrenic. There's an idea I'll submit to him for his New Year's Resolutions; Think up some more creative ways to keep a grip on your dwindling followers by re-asserting your godhood and absolute control over their lives. If in doubt, hire a good PR consultant.

Happy Holidays. :-)

Edited by author 12-25-2006 12:26 AM
It smacks loudly of hypocrisy when Sanjay Dadlani (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED", aka "Gaurasundara", aka "Dark Knight", aka "Azra`iL") has the audacity to discuss Jesus Christ and the Bible in light of his requests for Jesus, Biblical and Disney pornography and his public boasting about how his long-haired "Jesus look" was getting more sex with women! No kidding. As a matter of fact, the proof is still located on Google's Adult Groups:

- Sanjay & Gomorrah: Dadlani's Jesus Sex Fetish
- Sanjay's Requests For Pornographic Material

Sanjay's discoursing on Jesus and the Bible is akin to a prostitute discoursing on abstinence.

All that can be said about Sanjay's arguments is that he is consistently inconsistent and critically hypocritical. This is the guy who Anti-Sai Activists endorse, promote and fully associate themselves with. For shame!

• Sanjay Dadlani Exposed: /m272 /m1099
  "Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed




• "Usedbybaba" Exposed




• Barbara Dent Exposed




• Anthony "Tony" O'Clery Exposed



• Exposing The Lies, Deceit & Dishonesty Of Critics, Skeptics And Ex-Devotees Of Sathya Sai Baba: SaiSathyaSai.com"

Edited by author 12-25-2006 12:13 AM
Tsk tsk, more examples of off-wiki attacks using my private and personal blog entires to boot. Further proof of Gerald Morneo's stalking/harassment tendencies and continued avoidance/deflection away from Sathya Sai Baba in favour of ad-hominem attacking SB's critics. More evidence of being completely unable to edit Wikipedia articles in good faith.

Tsk, everyone is starting to notice the desperation, Mr. Moreno. Nobody cares for the opinion of a pro-Sai fanatic who has been kicked out (three times in a row) of every forum he has participated in. Christmas cheer for you. :-)

Suck on this:

"Tom Sackville, a former Home Office minister and chairman of FAIR, a cult-watching and victim support group, said: 'It is appallingly naive for the award scheme to involve young people and the royal family with an organisation whose leader is accused of paedophilia. Parents who plan to send their children on this month's pilgrimage ... should be aware of the danger their children are being exposed to."

- The Guardian

Sanjay Dadlani's (aka "Sai Baba EXPOSED") yearly Christmas Complaints:

Taken from Sanjay's former Killuminati blog entitled "Christmas Cheer" published on December 26th 2004:

"The thing about Christmas is that almost EVERYONE complains about the crap presents that they receive. I don't blame them, especially presents consist of utterly boring things such as a new pair of socks, jumpers, scarves, etc. Very rarely does anyone actually get what they want. Men NEVER get their Black & Decker All-purpose Driller, women NEVER get their Trilogy jewellery from Ernest Jones, Santa Claus NEVER eats the milk/alcohol and cookies that the kids put out for him..

..But then again, Santa has a good excuse. He doesn't exist.

I spent a lot of time thinking what to get for Mum and Dad. Well, the usual options for their birthdays are usually a new bottle of Oil of Olay and a bottle of aftershave respectively. This year I decided to do something a bit useful with all the money I have. I saw an advert on the telly about a hairdryer that was on offer, so I thought I'd get that for Mum. I also figured that since the radio in the kitchen is extremely shitty and gets poor reception, I might make Mum happy and get her a new one. While she pretends that she is happy with what she is, it still stands that a new radio is definitely needed since the current one was about two decades out of date. Since I'd get Mum a hairdryer, the radio could be considered a present for the "house", or at least a late anniversary present since I completely forgot about their anniversary (oops!). For Dad, I figured I might get him a bottle of Disaronno.

I actually did get all this stuff a few days ago. Like a little child I was so excited about it that I wanted to pull them out and gift it to them immediately, but I held myself in and managed to keep quiet. Christmas Eve night I excitedly placed them in position so that the parents would get a surprise when they sat down in their chairs next morning.

Well, the long and the short of it is that they basically appreciated that I had gone to the effort but they didn't like the presents. Unbelievable! I KNEW that Mum wouldn't like her presents. Apparently the hairdryer is unnecessary even though it is a Revlon professional. And the radio would get dirty in the kitchen. What a fucking lame excuse. I could have got her just a radio, but for 3 quid more I got her one with a CD player included in it. I suspect that they will ask for the receipts for exchanging.

It hurts when your own parents don't appreciate your gifts. You might think they would be sensitive enough to hide their feelings but nooooooo, they had to ask me questions like when and where I got it from, asking for the receipts etc. Coz apparently Tesco's has a cheaper radio. What kind of shit does Tesco sell anyway?

This reminds me of a few years earlier when I was more or less a schoolkid and I saved up al the spare change I had to get Mum a crystal keyring and a tiepin for Dad, for their anniversary. They didn't fucking appreciate those either, they went and exchanged the two for a stupic clock that they don't even use!

Why don't people have any fucking sensitivity ?? I could have got them crappy stuff like socks and shit, but I didn't! I bought ELECTRONICS wiv mah moolah! I went into a fucking sulk all day. I spend all that time thinking what actually might be useful and getting excited about it, only to get all down about it. I didn't see Dad complaining about his Disaronna though, naturally. Who wouldn't like Disaronna?

Oh yes, and did I mention that I got NOTHING for Christmas?


P.S. At the time of writing I have made a small discovery. Apparently my parents have played the same trick on me by leaving an envelope at my computer station with 50 quid in if for my present. While it is a nice gesture, it lacks imagination. They know that there are several things that I might like but no one shows any sign of going out and getting it. I am still very disappointed and hurt. At least Anna got soemthing nice. I'm almost jealous.

Why, oh why did I expect anything to be different anyway? My fucking fmaily ain't big on celebrations. Why, we don't even celebrate sodding Christmas so they may have an excuse, but what excuse can there be for not getting me stuff on my BIRTHDAY?"

Talk about a whiny crybaby! waaa waaa lol

• Sanjay Dadlani Exposed: /m272 /m1099
  "Sai Baba EXPOSED" Exposed




• "Usedbybaba" Exposed




• Barbara Dent Exposed




• Anthony "Tony" O'Clery Exposed



• Exposing The Lies, Deceit & Dishonesty Of Critics, Skeptics And Ex-Devotees Of Sathya Sai Baba: SaiSathyaSai.com"

Edited by author 12-24-2006 10:57 PM

"I saw heaven standing open and there before me was a white horse, whose rider is called Faithful and True. With justice he judges and makes war. His eyes are like blazing fire, and on his head are many crowns. He has a name written on him that no one knows but he himself. He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God. The armies of heaven were following him, riding on white horses and dressed in fine linen, white and clean. Out of his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations. 'He will rule them with an iron scepter.' He treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty. On his robe and on his thigh he has this name written:

'KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.'"

Sound familiar? Yes, that's from the Bible, Revelations 19.11-16 to be precise. This is a staple of Sai literature by way of their incorrigible attempts to prove that Sathya Sai Baba is the Messiah and his coming was foretold in acient scriptures. Without complicating the present issue, we may also observe that such claims of messiahship extend to other religions besides Christianity.

I say incorrigible because history bears witness to the justification of the vilest acts that were legitimised by the twisting of scripture. Irregardless of the intent of Revelations 19, Sai devotees interpret all of the scriptural qualities as being present in the person of Sai Baba, not least the fact that the Baba himself is responsible for this. Let us take a look at his own words of Christmas Day, 1972:

"There is one point that I cannot but bring to your special notice today. At the moment when Jesus was merging in the Supreme Principle of Divinity, He communicated some news to his followers ... The statement itself has been manipulated and tangled into a conundrum. The statement of Christ is simple: 'He who sent me among you will come again!' and he pointed to a Lamb. The Lamb is merely a symbol, a sign. It stands for the Voice - Ba-Ba; the announcement was the Advent of Baba. 'His Name will be Truth,' Christ declared. Sathya means Truth. 'He will wear a robe of red, a bloodred robe.' (Here Baba pointed to the robe He was wearing!). 'He will be short, with a crown (of hair). The Lamb is the sign and symbol of Love.' Christ did not declare that he will come again. He said, 'He who made me will come again.' That Ba-ba is this Baba and Sai, the short, curly-hair-crowned red-robed Baba, is come."

No, there is no use rubbing your eyes in disbelief, he really did say that in front of a packed crowd of Westerners on Christmas Day. Talk about seizing opportunities, just check out the way that he is not content with declaring himself the Messiah (Christ come again) but insists upon being recognised as GOD, He who supposedly <i>sent</ipan> Christ into the world.

One thing that I absolutely love about Sai devotees is the way they manage to take everything completely out of context while keeping a straight face. By this I am referring to the 'Rider of the White Horse' mentioned in Revelations; Verses 19-21 speak of both a 'beast' and a 'false prophet' who will war with the horse's rider (ostensibly the Messiah) and be defeated by him by a sword that emerges out of the rider's mouth. All's fair in love and weirdness as some may say, but who are these beasts and false prophets running around all over the place? For that we must turn to Revelations 13 (of course, which other number would work?) to find out all about the Beast and the infamous '666' number. Yup, it's our old friend the Anti-Christ.

Now if Sai Baba is identifying himself as the rider on the white horse mentioned in the Bible, what does it mean to suggest that he will be responsible for the killing of the Anti-Christ? What does it say about Sai Baba's leanings towards Fundamentalist Christianity? What does it say about Sai Baa-baa's apparent endorsement of mythical and devilish figures? What does it say about Sai BlahBlah's infinite capacity to talk crap?

In any case, isn't it ironic how Sai Baba is viewed in some quarters as being the Anti-Christ incarnate? With all his relentless self-flattery about being the very same God who sent Jesus Christ, he can't even get his story straight about that. Constant confusion is par for the course with this Baba, and it was one of the reasons why I felt unable to continue following him in good conscience. Sai Baba could perhaps redeem himself and return to his former glory as Superbaba again if only he made the effort, bearing in mind that claims to be God or Jesus have lost their novelty when they are made by practically every drunk, drug addict or schizophrenic. There's an idea I'll submit to him for his New Year's Resolutions; Think up some more creative ways to keep a grip on your dwindling followers by re-asserting your godhood and absolute control over their lives. If in doubt, hire a good PR consultant.

Happy Holidays. :-)