It looks pretty obvious to me (and everyone else) who's temper tantrums are increasing. :-)

We "demonise" the critics who "demonise" Sai Baba because they LIE, LIE, LIE and REFUSE to correct their disinformation. They know they cannot win without lying and manipulating the truth.
They are the ones doing sleight of hand with the facts as ALL are becoming increasingly aware.

Their temper tantrums are increasing.

The anti-Sais can't even keep their stories straight! So Sanjay makes Tony out to be a liar by saying the Doordarshan video did make it to tv. And if someone "smuggled" the Doordarshan video out of the Doordarshan Studio, that's called stealing so did Premanand receive stolen property? Do the anti-Sais EVER analyze and ask "rational" questions about WHAT they are reading? Doesn't look like it.

What the BBC brought to light is how awful their reporting is. Now that Alaya Rahm proved what a liar he is (not ONE witness showed up to back his claims even though he, his family, and the anti-Sais claimed they had scores of witnesses...there were 40 complainants listed on their filing!), the BBC is left with egg on their face and who knows, maybe now someone will sue them since the anti-Sais won't shut up are still using the poorly-researched piece of garbage to further their hate campaign.

Make up your mind, ex-premie. One minute you say I am hiding. The next you say I am trying to make a name. All my facts regarding the lies and criminal behavior of the anti-Sais are documented on the internet for those who are honest enough to look at them. The anti-Sais cannot even make it into a court room, which is what I predicted over the last few years and is also WELL-DOCUMENTED on the internet. You, on the other hand are full of hot air (and a coward to boot) and that is why you have to hide behind a phony user name. Several of the people smearing Prem Rawat have criminal histories too so that doesn't surprise me although you sound just like Reinier van der Sandt or one of his criminally-minded friends. The only thing people like you seem to be good at is harassing people, I'll give you that. That's why so many of you end up in jail in the end.

Edited by author 06-11-2006 09:53 PM
Sai Baba: Demonising The Critics - See this article to see a complete list of Sai Baba's repulsive and contradictory behaviour against his critics. For a so-called embodiment of love, he sure has a few gripes against people who pullaway his robe and expose him for the fraud that he is. See how he calls his critics 'Judases', 'cawing crows', alleges bribery, and much more false and unfounded accusations.

On the other hand, I do agree that my recent "incest" article was a nice try; it has produced a host of successive articles:

Sai Baba: Incestuous Reflections

Kasturi's Incestuous Revisionism

Far From The Incestuous Crowd

:-)

And many more earth-shaking revelations to be revealed. Tough luck, Mr. Judas, the Gospel of Judas has not been universally recognised as authentic. :-) What does Jesus have to do with this anyway? Are you contending that our recent revelations have no basis in truth, despite being recorded in official devotional literature? Careful. ;-)

Hmm...so as per the Gospel of Judas, Jesus told Judas to betray him.
What do you think about this, Mr Exposed? Nice try...Judas eh?

Edited by author 06-07-2006 12:01 AM
I wasn't joking.

Sai Baba: Born Of Incest - find out all about Sai Baba's mysterious parentage with revealing new information.

And while it's still "Antichrist Day", let's revisit my views on the possibility of Sai Baba being the Antichrist:

Sai Baba: Antichrist Superstar!

Re /m129: It's nice to hear a direct message from Prashanti Nilayam admitting how they were virtually brought to their knees thanks to the BBC documentary. They'd like to label the BBC - aworld-renowned broadcaster - as "unscrupulous" just because the BBC has an opinion of it's own.

What they fail to get into their thick heads is that the BBC documentary (and the Sai Expose in general) does not only consist of sexual abuse allegations, but that the Expose is multifarious and works on all angles.

The BBC documentary brought to light the fact (among many others) that Sai Baba's involvement in murders have NOT been forgotten. In case anyone forgot, as well as yesterday being "Antichrist Day" it was also the THIRTEENTH anniversary of the 1993 murders. How's that for a bunch of apples?

And now we have the scandalous revelation that Sai Baba is an inbred messiah. Tsk, it just gets worse and worse for the devoted minions.

Edited by author 06-05-2006 11:11 PM
Re /m130: "And by the sound of things, the tape was so lousy in quality it could not be used for broadcast and that is WHY it never made it to t.v."

Whatta lie!

The whole point about this movie is that it was broadcast on Doordarshan, which is a government-sponsored channel (sort of like the BBC) and not your average tabloid channel. In India, if something comes on Doordarshan then it comes with some form of authority.

Secondly, of course it made it to TV! Not just Indian TV but British TV too! The very name 'Guru Busters' comes from an episode of Equinox on Channel 4 (UK Broadcasting station), from an episode entitled 'Guru Busters'. I have a copy of this whole documentary on VHS cassette. The documentary discussed other fake gurus apart from Sai Baba too.

This is what happens when you open your mouth and rubbish spews forth from it. Your speech becomes incoherent and you start frothing at the mouth with lies.

Miracele or siddhis mean nothing. Sri Ramakrishna Parmahamsa said they were 'rubbish'...Tony

Why does sb say that his mother still visits him, in her astral body, when he also says she merged with him and got Moksha?...Contradictory yes!...Tony

There is absolutely NO proof the video was confiscated as Tony the "true believer" in all things negative claims. The only ones claiming this are the biased rationalists. In fact, it was Premanand who claimed his copy "supernaturally disappeared," NOT Doordarshan! No one from Doordarshan has backed up this silly claim. If the tape was "confiscated" how was it that both the skeptics AND Haraldsson were able to get a copy of it to analyze? And by the sound of things, the tape was so lousy in quality it could not be used for broadcast and that is WHY it never made it to t.v.

********

The GuruBusters film also discussed a video that allegedly captured Sathya Sai Baba producing a gold necklace by sleight of hand. Sanal Edamaruku (a self-professed atheist and rationalist) said about this video: "In November 1994 during the celebration of his 69th birthday, he was caught red-handed when he 'materialized' a golden chain, a cameraman of the national TV (Doordarshan) filmed the scene and revealed -just by chance- the secret: a close-up shows him plucking the chain from the bottom of a plaque, where it has been fixed before. Sai Baba was powerful enough to get the film clipping confiscated before it could be broadcasted, but copies of the cassette, smuggled out from the Doordarshan studios, were circulated all over India and abroad In Guru Busters, Channel IV's famous documentary by Robert Eagle about the work of Indian Rationalists, which has meantime been broadcasted in twelve countries, the clipping is reproduced in slow motion, proving the case beyond doubts. Sai Baba's reputation suffered serious damage."

The only problem with all these claims, about Sathya Sai Baba being filmed faking a materialization, is that Erlendur Haraldsson (author of Modern Miracles) stated that he and his associates carried out a careful analysis of the video shown in the Guru Busters film. Haraldsson stated the following about the video: "The quality and resolution of the tape leaves much to be desired and limits the inferences that can be drawn from it. Dr. Wiseman took the videotape to a company which specialises in investigating corporate fraud. This company posesses some of the world's best equipment designed to enhance poor quality videotape. The technician kindly offered to enhance the videotape in question. The videotape was run through a real time Snell & Wilcox Kudos Noise Reducer. The machine carries out three operations. First, it removes via recursive filters the random noise on the tape caused by repeated copying. Second, it imporves the graininess of the video by median filters and finally enhances any edges on the the video through edge enhancement filters. After all this the video is certainly easier to watch, and did not contain much of the random noise present on the copy provided by the Deccan Chronicle. However, the resulting tape still did not reveal further information about the incident. In short, the reason for Sai Baba's hand movements still appears unclear and is open for various interpretations, but the tape contained no firm evidence of fraud. The company also analysed several still frames taken from the video. These were scanned into a computer and run through an Improve image processing system (developed by the Home Office in Britain). Again, the images were enhanced via median filters and certain areas of the frames were enlarged. The resulting photographs show the crucial moment as Sai Baba's hands touch under the memento, but do not reveal any further information." Therefore, all these claims about Sathya Sai Baba clearly resorting to trickery, to manifest the necklace, are patently false.

http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/guru-bust...ry-gurubusters.html

Here is an important news.

As you are aware, for quite some time now, totally unfounded, despicable, pernicious and absolutely false rumours have been circulating about our Beloved Swami. Not only have these rumours been spread through e-mails and the internet, but some unscrupulous TV channels have enough gone so far as to fabricate so-called documentaries and aired them in many countries.

Over the years, we have received from devotees across the world, many e-mails and letters expressing deep distress and anguish. In respect of spreading falsehood, the notorious BBC documentary appears to have hurt most.

We now have some very good news for all devotees, especially for those who for years have been suffering the pain of seeing all these rumours and false allegations being eagerly lapped up by the gullible.

The news is this:

The young man who made most of these allegations against Swami and who was the star accuser in the malicious and vicious BBC documentary, filed a case in California in January, 2005.

The case was set for hearing on April 28 th, 2006.

During the handling of the lawsuit, witnesses were identified and interviewed, who were present in Prashanti Nilayam, when the molestations alleged by the plaintiff were supposed to have taken place.

One of the witnesses, Mr. Kreydick was examined by lawyers and the proceedings were recorded on video tape. This happened on March 16 th, 2006 . Subsequently, the video deposition was made into a typed deposition, which Mr. Kreydick signed on April 7 th, 2006 . He also issued a personal statement to the effect that although he originally believed in the allegations made against Sai Baba, he later discovered that there were many critical discrepancies and contradictions in the allegations made by the plaintiff and the anti-Sai community in general. His said that all these allegations had a hidden bias. He therefore retracted his earlier position in support of the allegations.

This marked the turning point. The young man who filed the complaint then dismissed his own lawsuit on April 19 th, 2006.

The case was then dismissed with prejudice. It means no damages to the plaintiff, and that the case can never be filed again in any court in America or in India.

Yes, dear Subscriber! Truth always triumphs!!

Please spread the good news to all you know and do everything you can so that Sai devotees everywhere hear this news immediately and rejoice.

The message that has come out, loud and clear is that TRUTH ALWAYS TRIUMPHS, though it takes its own sweet time to do so.

Soon, Radio Sai and H2H will bring to you a special feature giving you all the details of this glorious triumph.

Meanwhile, rejoice.

Once again, we request that you share this good news with as many as you can.

Let it spread like wild fire, burning away all the residual doubts and misgivings.

Thank you and JAI SAI RAM

Just look at Sanjay Dadlani's past and present blogs and postings and see who is the super-hypocritical, fanatical king of ad hominem attacks. Really pathetic to watch a pervert like him whine about other peoples behavior when he ought to be in jail in light of so many of his criminal confessions of downloading child porn and buying illegal drugs on the street. And then there is his misogynistic blog in which he posted pics of women he stalked and put disgusting captions like, "They want it" and other perverted sexual drivel.

This is the problem with the anti-Sai bandits who fail to take responsibilty for their own continued hypocrisy and think they have a license to harass everyone who disagrees with their "worldview" as Dadlani the wannabe intellectual calls it. If you don't like my "worldview" keep your nose out of it bozo! If you weren't so nosy you wouldn't have an ulcer over your obsession for sticking your big nose into everyone elses business.

Unfortunately for you, my worldview is consistent with the view of the legal authorities and video EXPERTS (of which you are NOT) and YOURS isn't, coward. And until you bozos face the hard realities of those facts you will continue to live in your delusional little worlds whining like the cowards you are.

Edited by author 06-03-2006 07:59 PM
Erlendur Haraldsson? Oh yes, I remember him. He knows quite a bit about Sai Baba's relationships with male devotees back in the 1940s/1950s that he never published in his book. :-)

Haraldsson also investigated the ressurrection of Walter Cowan and found the truth to be extraordinarily different from the official version. :-) I wonder what Sai Baba's devotees think of the fact that he unearthed curious information about Sai Baba: Sai apparently had a whole family of scorpions living in his hair at one time. :-)

His published academic paper into Sai Baba's miracles (with Karlis Osis) was published in a psychological journal. According to the abstract, the investigation concludes something that devotees will find unexpected. :-) Unfortunately the database appears to be down right now so I cannot find it, it should be back up by Monday.

Re /m120: Sorry pal, looks like Lisa will continue her overemotional fanaticism and denials as well as her abusive and vituperative behaviour. History has shown that she has never contributed sensibly and rationally to any sort of discussion except to overlace her speeches with ad-hominem attacks and threats. We see the same type of mentality: Because she doesn't think that the movies show Sai Baba's fraud, everyone else who disagrees with her point of view are liars. *shakes head*