Edited by author 05-30-2006 08:20 PM
Re /m104: Nobody is interested in conversing with a nutty pervert who shamelessly accuses former devotees of every evil perversion under the sun without any form of proof at all, what to speak of someone who claims to have delusionary visions of Jesus Christ and several angels, wishing death upon former devotees of Sathya Sai Baba, racism against white and Middle Eastern men, and keeping her sexuality secret for an extensive period of time:

Sai Baba's Naughty Children: Lisa De Witt.

Her latest appellation of "Warrior Princess" is easily connected to the TV series 'Xena: Warrior Princess', where the main character played by Lucy Lawless is a very well known lesbian icon.

In any case, she has proved time and time again that she is completely incapable of discussing the issues surrounding Sai Baba, most notably the recent boo-boo about Kali yuga. Her posting here achieves nothing and is simply a distraction, and therefore I renew my calls for her posting rights to be revoked here, and in the meantime we all do not feed this troll with the attention she desperately seeks.

Poor pathological liar Dadlani. There's more than enough proof of the perverts & mental cases in your group. All one has to do is read your foul-mouthed posts! Out of your OWN mouth, remember perverts?

So Tony, the cross-dressing maven, are you finally admitting that YOU think all the homos (like Larsson, Ord, Sampath, Bailey, Brooke and jesus porn fanatic Dadlani) in your anti-Sai group are perverts?

Like I said, EVERYTHING about you is perverted Tony.

Edited by author 05-30-2006 10:12 PM
Dadlani gives himself away. How does Dadlani know so much about gay icons? Hmmm.

Sai Baba documented in devotional literature as having abused a three-year-old child. Find out all about it here:

Suffer The Children Unto Sai Baba.

You can't argue with a brainwashed devotee who continues to let Sai baba abuse her child. You can't argue with a crying child who doesn't want to hang out with Sai Baba any more. You can't argue with Sai Baba's elder sister, who apparently exhibits a blasé attitude towards Sai baba's violence towards little kids. You can't argue with Sai Baba's physical/verbal abuse of the mother and her brother when they were kids.

Sick pervert Sai Baba.

Alaya Rahm couldn't even make it into the courtroom with his accusations. Nobody but the pathological liars in the anti-Sai group believe his ridiculous stories. Talk about "true believer" syndrome. These wackos never saw a lie they didn't like!

The little boy Dadlani whines about most likely had cystic fibrosis and required percussive therapy (which is very painful but necssary) in his back to keep him from dying of the lung disease.

On the other hand, keep your children away from Dadlani. He admitted to downloading child porn, buying drugs on the street and drooling over La Vey's satanic bible. He also stalked women and put their pics on his blog with disgusting sexual comments.

The "true believers" in the anti-Sai crowd are on the road to perdition.

Funny thing about the anti-Sais, they complain about people being abused but the people they babble about aren't complaining. You don't see this little boy complaining now do you? The anti-Sais only feed you selectively the part of the picture the want you to see. They don't want you to see the truth.

I am struck by the elevated level of discussion from joe108 (Moreno) and especially "Lisa Warrior Princess". Where in heck were they brought up... in what slum or brothel? In the eyes of anyone with their senses in order, they give the whole game away by their own words... give it game, set and match to sai baba exposed, of course!

Edited by author 05-31-2006 04:56 AM
Apparently ex-premie the coward hiding behind a phony name (probably Dadlani pretending to be someone else) hasn't seen the vulgar sexual language used by both Dadlani AND O'Clery. Or if he has, is complicit in their sexual perversion. After all, the perverts of a feather are definitely flocking together in th anti-Sai gang of thugs. Almost everyone I've investigated in the anti-Sai group is a sexual pervert or drug and/or alcohol abuser.

Edited by author 05-31-2006 05:24 AM
Just as I said. This Lisa wants a name so she can go to town and defame the more and the worse. Hard luck. You show your pit-bottom nature every time you post anywhere, it seems.
BTW, this is NOT Dadlani... but Lisa will say anything - to go by the posting I have just looked at, no distortion or outright lie seems beyond her.

Seems Lisa is a perfect example for a Sai follower. But I know plenty who are revolted that his name is associated with her. I have found a blog about her, which - even if by her enemy - makes for interesting reading.
See http://saibabaexposed.blogspot.com/2006/05...n-lisa-de-witt.html Hi there, folks, use you own wits... not de Witts!

Edited by author 05-31-2006 06:17 AM
What'd I say folks? It's Dadlani the pervert (or one of his partners in crime like Reinier van der Sandt) playing his usual childish mindgames. What would the anti-Sais do without all their mindgames? Would they just roll over and die from no attention? That's ok bozo, most of the stuff documented on your gang of creeps is for CRIMINAL and /or VERY perverted behavior. Maybe you need to wash your brain out too since you are consorting with the lowest of the low, coward. I wonder how the ex-premies feel about a wacko like you pretending to be in their camp. Especially when you are hanging out with Dadlani the jesus porn freako.

Funny that the anti-Sais feel free to slander and slur anyone they may and then whine like crybabies when the DOCUMENTED TRUTH is told about them. That's why they avoid the courtroom like it's the plague.
And poor Reinier van der Sandt has to hide behind anonymous names like "ex-premie" because he is afraid to show his mug in public.

http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.c...-van-der-sandt.html

http://sanjaydadlaniexposed.blogspot.com/2...een-porn-child.html

Namaste,
>
> I don't believe sb is a great anti Christ, he's too insignificant,
> but he does fit the bill for the minor anti Christs mentioned in
> the NT...the deceivers...Tony
>
>
> He follows up by stating that this falling away will immediately
> precede or be accompanied by the revealing of "the Man of Sin,"
also
> called "the Son of Perdition" (v. 3) and "the Lawless One" (v 8).
> The Man of Sin is portrayed by Paul in this passage as a personal
> entity, not a government or organization. This one is widely
equated
> with the Antichrist spoken of by John, as well as "the Beast"
> mentioned in the book of Revelation (Rev. 11:7; 13:1-6; 19:19-20).
>
> Paul tells us that the Man of Sin will "oppose and exalt himself
> above ALL that is called God or that is worshiped" (v. 4). This
> would include not only the one true God, but all other "gods and
> lords" (cf. 1 Cor. 8:5) as well. These "gods and lords" are the
gods
> (Heb. 'elohim) of the nations (Deu. 6:14; 31:16; Jdg. 2:11-13; II
> Kings 18:33-35; Zep. 2:11), the ruling angels of the heavenly
divine
> council.
>
> Paul then tells us that the Man of Sin will "sit as God in the
> Temple of God, showing himself that he is God." The Greek verb
> apodeiknunta ("showing") literally means "to demonstrate, prove or
> proclaim" something. Paul says that the reason the Man of Sin does
> this is to prove TO HIMSELF that he is God.
>
> To understand why this act would demonstrate to the Man of Sin
that
> he is greater than all other divine beings, we must determine what
> Paul meant by the Man of Sin sitting in the Temple of God. How
> should we understand this statement? Is it figurative or literal?
>
> If Paul intended it to be figurative, what would the Temple of God
> represent? In another of his letters, Paul speaks of the body of a
> believer being the Temple of God because the Holy Spirit dwells
> within it (1 Cor. 3:16-17; 1 Cor. 6:19). Similar references in the

Namaste,

sb sits in the mandir claiming to be the Father of Jesus, Allah and
all the names of God. Yet he is a pedophile, murderer, embezzler,
criminal conjurer--------a man of sin, claiming to be God....Tony

Edited by author 05-31-2006 08:35 PM
Re /m113: Thanks, ex-premie, for your compliments.
Re /m114: Given that several different people we posting here before I/we came along and are still posting/reading this board, why do I have to respond to asinine accusations of posting under false names when I have my own? For the record, I am not ex-premie. With all due respect to ex-premie, the term 'ex-premie' is used by former followers of Guru Maharajji. I have no connection with Guru Maharajji or his movement whatsoever.

Re /m112: The idea that the boy in question (see 'Suffer The Children Unto Sai Baba') may have suffered from cystic fibrosis does not stand as a form of proof. Since Lisa "Warrior Princess" has no access to medical records of the boy in question or his mother (who was also abused as a child by Sai Baba along with her brother), it is unreasonable to expect that Sai Baba violently beat a three-year-old child under the premise of "healing" him of alleged cystic fibrosis. By the same token, we can also believe that Sai Baba touches, rubs oil on and orally sucks the genitals of many men and young boys for the purpose of raising their kundalinis as many devotees would have us believe.

These comments in particular are most disturbing:

"The little boy Dadlani whines about most likely had cystic fibrosis...

"Funny thing about the anti-Sais, they complain about people being abused but the people they babble about aren't complaining. You don't see this little boy complaining now do you? The anti-Sais only feed you selectively the part of the picture the want you to see. They don't want you to see the truth."

Pardon me, but I find it a humanistic duty to "whine" in protest when a 25/26 year old boy (Sai Baba) needless and violently beats a three-year-old child for no apparent reason.

Aside from that, this incident is recounted in a devotional book published by a Sai devotee which anybody can purchase and see the "truth" for themselves. And a plus to that, the testimony states that the boy did complain in a most anguished manner:

Source: "The poor little boy! He came running to me, sobbing. The sobs did not subside even after one hour ... The minute I took him out of the cradle, my son would say pathetically, 'Don't take me to Swami, mother,' and break into tears. I would feel very pained. But when Swami ordered me to bring the boy, how could I say no?"

The boy was also reported as "yelling and crying". What a crying shame that the mother was so brainwashed about Sai Baba's divinity that she had convinced herself that this extremely violent behaviour was for the good of her child. I'm sure that would go down very well with today's mothers. Try that logic out on your friends; go to the nearest mother you see, attempt to beat the living hell out of her child, and let's see what happens.

It is deplorable that today's "Sai devotees" dismiss this activity as 'whining' and otherwise worthy of ignoring. Sai Baba is on record as having violently abused a three-year-old child, and had even abused the child's mother and her brother when they were young to boot! It just goes to show you how much Sai Baba's devotees have imbibed the love, compassion and sympathy that he so often preaches about. As is the guru, so are the disciples.

i am surprised that people can call each other names .Lisa (this is most probably a man in a woman's name) is worthcalpeople names and wasting ur time. if u have logcal arguments to prove your point do it . if u do not want to know the truth and don't want others togive their openion, it shows you do not want to know the truth. Well that is ur wish. but don't make personal attacks. i am a victim of baba and iam not dadlani or any other of ur knwon people. if i call baba names i have the right, for i suffered.
   
  I know how u feel? but know this fanatic emotional denials will not be an answer to the questions raised by anti sai s . what is ur answer to the vedio clippings showing baba cheating his so called creations QT - Lisa Warrior Princess <qtopic+29-FE68KidtskS@quicktopic.com> wrote:

    
---------------------------------
  Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new Click here Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger Download now < replied-to message removed by QT >

You know I had never thought that lisa may be a man, even thought it seems there is some sexual confusion.

There is more to follow in the story of Sai Baba's violent beating of a tiny three-year-old child. Please avail yourselves of the following article:

Suffer MORE Children Unto Sai Baba.

Edited by author 06-03-2006 12:54 AM
You know I never thought that Tony O'Clery may be a woman although there is some sexual confusion (see "aoclerry" female (Antoinette?) yahoo profile on google and on membership roster at SSB2). See also the movie credits for Third Man Out, a gay themed movie shown only on cable, which lists an Anthony O'Clery as one of the actors. Tony admitted he hung out with the transgendered men at Puttaparthi. Maybe Tony likes to wear his wife's clothes.

Sorry, I don't take anonymous people who claimed to be sexually abused by Baba seriously. I've seen too many liars and you are probably one of them.
You've probably never even been to see Baba as your story sounds a phony as a three dollar bill. And you ARE attacking Baba, liar. In fact, you are a coward doing it anonymously so get real con artist. I'm a REAL sexual abuse victim and I can smell a phony a thousand miles away.