top bar
QuickTopic free message boards logo
New TopicNew Topic My TopicsMy Topics News
Skip to Messages

TOPIC:

Who cares about XMLSpy? Apart from me?

6
dennis
06-01-2011
03:42 AM ET (US)
 I have used Liquid a swell, I think their xslt engine is much faster and I think their interface is much more user friendly with the diagramming, some nice screnshots here, http://www.liquid-technologies.com/xml-editor.aspx
5
too corporate and expensi
05-16-2011
08:05 AM ET (US)
 The main problem I have with XML Spy is that it's too pricey for what it is, personally I think Altova would rather be in the corporate space with corporate level licences than to bother with home users, I have been using Liquid XML Editor for several years now and although they are a bit corporate as well, the home user pricing is fairly cheap.
4
stylus studio
08-18-2006
05:05 PM ET (US)
 We're biased but try using the Stylus Studio XML Editor - a free trial download is available. Here is some user feedback of xmlspy.
  Messages 3-2 deleted by topic administrator 07-21-2006 09:00 AM
1
Guy KewneyPerson was signed in when posted
11-01-2004
01:21 PM ET (US)
 When development was halted on a piece of software called QNE the world lost a lovely, elegantly simple content management system for flat file web site creation.

The inner workings of the program are beyond me. All I know is that the friend who started out on this project had to abandon it because of insuperable problems with the Python scripting environment, which, three years ago at least, was a horrid heap of inter-locking utilities, some of which had actually been tested to work with one or two other utilities...

What I also know is that the author used XMLSpy to create the XML pages which produce NewsWireless every day. It's a real professional's tool, and I've just downloaded an evaluation version of the suite.

I wonder if I dare try to play with it?
Upgrade to PRO

Upload pictures, personalize your board, and more!

Print | RSS Views: 1384 (Unique: 532 ) / Subscribers: 0 | What's this?