my number 3 test message

Aka tatianaf
I agree with you delina about the quality and people feeling good playing! I just wanted to check about the rule!! :)

Regarding the 36 and 37 combination entry by 42n81
10/27/04

From http://www.fotolog.net/42n81/

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
a two-fer!!!

this is a sign in the parking lot
of the regional rail line in
Malvern, Pennsylvania


happy floggin`
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~


 pixelation @ 2004-10-27 21:29 said:

42n81, this is Delina, moderator for this group. It is not valid to have two numbers on the same entry. If you want to crop it so only part of the word stall, and one arrow show, and use just the number 36, that would be OK. Let me know soon. Thanks.

NOTE: I will be removing the entry with two numbers on it, 36 & 37. /42n81 very kindly and nicely made it so only one number (the 36) shows. Didn't just fill in with plain black either, but put something nice to look at. Thanks. This picture will go away, but your corrected entry will stay.
Thanks, ~Delina

Edited by author 10-28-2004 04:30 PM
Regarding the #39 from /tillymania, here is her comment that was below it.
10/28/04

From http://www.fotolog.net/tillymania/

I did it by myself, but I arrived late, because my lucky number is 38!
But thatīs ok!
Tilly

Note: Tilly, I am not deleting it because of quality. It seems like you did some nice artistic work on it. Unfortunately, no matter how great our work might be we are not supposed to create our own numbers. We are supposed to hunt for them and find them like on a street sign, billboard, food labels, etc. The numbers would be occuring out there in the world. No magazines, screen shots, calendar pictures, books, or things like that. So please keep trying. Basic rule is if someone could sit there and keep changing the entry to the next number, like a tally counter, or clock,or drawing your own numbers, or creating them in a photo program, it is not valid. Good luck. ~Delina

Regarding the #40 here are some comments:
10/28/04

From http://www.fotolog.net/kmc/
**********

tatianaf @ 2004-10-28 09:32 said:

I think 39 isn`t valid, so we have to wait to post a 40.
Delina, is the rule about quality still valid?

**********

 pieplate @ 2004-10-28 11:03 said:

If quality were all, my 33 would be out. /tillymania`s 39 doesn`t look like a photo...

ALSO: I need to delete this photo of 40 because the 39 before it is going to be deleted also as invalid. This 40 is somewhat blurry, but not horrible. Tatianaf/ I am not going to be as strict as sequential_nmbrs. I don't want the pictures to be dreadful, but if I can read the number and it looks like it was obtained from a valid source, I'm probably going to let some borderline ones in. I think it makes people feel good about playing and then try harder next time to get a really good one. ~Delina

Regarding # 20

I don't think there is much I can do with the number 20. I took the shot while I was driving away from NH Speedway with my Sony PDA.
While the number is small, I note that it is larger than the 18 yet not as clear.

aka: tatianaf
Thanks Delina.
All fotologs started with "T" are having guestbook problems. We can only hope that it won't take so long!!

Hi,
As you know, Fotolog, sometimes has guestbook problems. If that happens please post your comment here. Mention a bit about the picture and the photographer so we know which one you are commenting about.