I'm not even sure where to begin in debunking this latest in anti-Bush hate screeds, if only to say this once again demonstrates why the left clearly fails to understand the man. No one could ever claim President Bush wins in the eloquence department. Indeed, debating is not his forte. Unlike Kerry, he didn't spend 20 years in the Senate doing nothing more than polishing his talking skills (indeed, I'd say Kerry is probably turned on by the sound of his own voice, nevermind his own continuously pompous, arrogant, and self-important appearance - which was lampooned by none other than Gary Trudeau some 30+ years ago, and of course, we all know what a shill for the right Trudeau is...) at the expense of substantive accomplishments (well, he did go down to kiss that well-known freedom fighter Danny Ortega's tuchus, that certainly has to count for something, right ?).

Hey, Kerry gives good debate 'n speech, as did Clinton, but when you take a gander beyond the slick presentation, you'll notice the forked tongue speaking either (at best) distortions or (at worst) bald-face lies. Oh, so Bush was making a "face" at the claims from the unaccomplished former Lieutenant-Governor of Michael Dukakis, which apparently is a crime against humanity ? Oh, what cheek ! Quelle arrogance ! No one could cite anything in the debate that Bush said which was blatantly false, in stark contrast to his opponent.

When it comes right down to it, it is Monsieur Kerry that is the arrogant and childish pol who has the "two faces" that put America seriously at risk (after all, when Kerry spoke of putting together "international allies", he was really speaking of the French - ah, the same French whose leader was in bed with Saddam Hussein). Ah, well, when JFK loses next month, perhaps he can call M. Chirac and ask for a slot to take over his job when he finally steps down, then Kerry will always have Paris. Ooh la la !