i dont know he has issues he hates jews he hates america but u know what y crucify him he is 61 give him an altimatem come back to united states and play competive chess and all is forgiven if not b extradited to us

Jepp, the CIA FBI NSA NASA.. have huge photoalbums of there own arsholes! Here is Bobby's:
http://www.jefffaerber.com/portfolio1/images_portfolio/dick.jpg

Bobby Fischer does not deserve to go to prison, but as Sophia Polgar has said, "he could use some help". Undoubtedly, he suffers from paranoid schizophrenia.

i agree with u mayb just fine him

If any of you would sign a petition to free Bobby, go to http://www.freebobby.org. It is URGENT that everyone who supports Bobby Fischer write to the Minister of Justice in Japan at this point. It appears that Bobby's appeal has been rejected.
Here is short prototype of a letter you can copy and paste and then send it off to the Justice Minister in Japan
I have sent a letter to this address and it has not bounced back



To: webmaster@moj.go.jp
Subject: Regarding Bobby Fischer


Mr. Justice Minister Daizo Nozawa
We kindly request that you will treat the case of Bobby Fischer according to all standard legal procedure in your country. It would be an utter disgrace if his case would be treated in any other way. To our knowledge, the standard time for physical deportation to take place after your order is three months. We hope that you will not move outside those standards, or it will be obvious to the rest of the world that this matter is highly political and unjust.


With regards


(Your Name)

i have alreday done that i sent email to president bush cheny colin powell to ask for his pardon

good on ya, every person counts, and every letter matter
his case has started to remind me more and more of Kafka´s trial

COURT CHANGE


My name is Maurice Frank and I'm in Scotland. I can't stand Bobby Fischer's racism but I take all opportunities to make this court change known, whoever wants to use it in any legal case. It was used in this case it could not work in favour of BF's ideas, because it only works in favour of liberal fair ideas.
THE COURT CHANGE IN 144 COUNTRIES: judges' decisions are no longer final.
I have been lobbying people in a series of political situations throughout the last 3 years, Genoa, Australia, Israel etc, to spread knowledge of the court change, whose shifting of power in favour of ordinary people ensures that it has been under a media silence. Nevertheless, it's on publicly traceable record through petitions 730/99 in the European, PE6 and PE360 in the Scottish, parliaments. Since 7 July 1999 all court or other legal decisions are "open to open ended fault finding by all parties and recapitulation therupon" instead of final.
This follows from my European Court of Human Rights case 41597/98 on an insurance scam of evictions of unemployed people from hotels. This case referred to violation of civil status from 13 May 97, yet the admissibility decision claimed the last inland decision stage was on 4 Aug 95. ECHR has made itself illegal, by claiming finality in issuing a syntactically contradictory nonsense decision that reverses the physics of time. It violates every precedent of member countries' laws recognising the chronology of cause and effect, in evidence.
The European Convention's section on requiring a court to exist, now requires its member countries to create a new schismatic ECHR that removes the original's illegality, by its decisions not being final. It follows this requires inland courts to be compatible with open ended decisions and doing inland work connected to them. Hence inland decisions also cease to be final and become open ended, in the 44 Council of Europe countries.

World trade irreversibly means jurisdictions are not cocooned but have overlapping cases. When a case overlaps an affected and unaffected country, the unaffected country becomes affected, through having to deal with open ended case content open endedly, that can affect any number of other cases open endedly. Open endedness is created in its system.
The concept of "leave to appeal" is abolished and judges no longer have to be crawled to as authority figures. Every party in a case is automatically entitled to lodge a fault finding against any decision, stating reasons. These are further return faultable, including by the original fault finder, stating reasons. A case reaches its outcome when all fault findings have been answered or accepted.
Anyone can add to the list of court change countries outside the Council of Europe, showing autocracies, pending their freer futures, as well as democracies. It starts with:


Israel and Lebanon through the case in Belgium on the Sabra-Chatila massacres.
America, Canada, Australia through my child brain research ethics dispute with Arizona university, stalled by an American government obstruction of justice. Obviously there will be many cases making these 3 countries court change, so I should not be seen as seeking the ego fantasy of taking personal credit for it through my case, but time priority entitles me to put my case in the list like this.

Rest of the list:






Yugoslavia through war crimes cases overlapping Bosnia.
Kosovo through war crimes cases overlapping Yugoslavia.
North Cyprus through Turkey's UN legal challenge against South Cyprus joining the EU.

Belarus through its election dispute with OSCE election monitoring.
Monaco through International Amateur Athletics Federation drug hearings there.
Vatican City through Sinead O'Connor's ordination as a Catholic priest.
Cuba through Elian Gonzalez.
Haiti through objecting to receiving petty crime deportations from America.
Antigua through its constitutional crisis on capital punishment.
Trinidad through its Privy Council case on capital punishment.
Jamaica through claims on both sides of American linked arms trade background to its violence.
Mexico through the Benjamin Felix drug mafia extradition to America.
Belize through Michael Ashcroft.
Guatemala through the child stealing and adoption scandal overlapping America.
Colombia through America's supposed human rights policy intervention in training Colombian police and military.
Guyana through the £12m debt claim dropped by Iceland (the shop).
Brazil through EU immigration unfairnesses to its football players, necessitating a mafia trade in false passports.
Argentina through its ECHR case on the General Belgrano.
Chile through General Pinochet.
Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay through Judge Garzon's citation of Henry Kissinger for the South American military conspiracy Operation Condor.
Chad and Senegal through a French action in Senegal obtaining Chad's former dictator Habre for trial under Pinochet's precedent.
Algeria through the Harkis' case from the Algerian war.
Liberia, Sierra Leone, Mali, Morocco through the Insight News case.
Ivory Coast through the chocolate slavery scandal.
Ghana through the World Bank's Dora slave scandal.
Togo through the Lome peace accords for Sierra Leone, and their breaking as an issue in factional arms supply to there.
Burkina Faso through an arms trade case of smuggling through it from Ukraine to civil war factions in Sierra Leone and Angola.
Niger and Rwanda through Oxfam's case of buying an arms trade "end user certificate" for Rwanda in Niger.
Burundi through the war crimes trial of Rwanda's 1994 head of state.
Tanzania and Japan through the 2000 G8 summit, because Tanzania Social and Economic Trust broadcast a contradiction in implementing both its wishes for economic advance and its debt relief terms.
Mozambique through its cashew nuts dispute with the World Bank.
South Africa and Lesotho through a WHO case against American pharmaceutical ethics there.
Nigeria through reported Nigerian drug mafia crime in South Africa.
Dahomey and Gabon through their slave trafficking scandals overlapping Nigeria and Togo.
Zimbabwe through its land finances dispute with Britain.
Equatorial Guinea through the charges in Zimbabwe of a coup conspiracy.
Zambia through Cafod's collection of objections to food supply and health violations in its IMF structural adjustment program.
Namibia through the Herero genocide case against Germany.
Angola, Congo Kinshasa, Ecuador through arms trade smuggling to them from Bulgaria and Slovakia.
Congo Brazzaville through the Jean-Francois Ndenge case in France.
Sudan through Al Shafi pharmaceutical factory suing America for bombing it.
Ethiopia through aid sector comment on its conditional debt relief.
Somaliland through its problem with Russian and South Korean coastal fishing.
Kenya through the Archer's Post munitions explosion case overlapping Britain.
Uganda through the Acholiland child slave crisis and Sudan's agreement to return children.
Mauritius through the Ilois rights judgment on the Chagos clearances.
Yemen through its problem with Spain over the missile shipment.
United Arab Emirates through Mohammed Lodi.
Saudi Arabia through the lawsuit by families of September 11 victims.
Qatar through the capture of Saddam Hussein.
Bahrain through the call for American witnesses in Richard Meakin's case.
Kuwait through the terrorism arrests in Saudi Arabia.
Iraq through the weapons inspection dispute before the invasion.
Jordan through its threat of "unspecified measures" in its relations with Israel.
Egypt through its disputes with Tanzania and Kenya over use of Nile water.
Libya, Syria, Iran through the Lockerbie bomb trial.
Afghanistan through Ben Ladan.
Pakistan through a dispute between supporters of enslaved women and the British embassy for not helping them escape.
India, Bangladesh, China, Indonesia through the World Wildlife Fund's campaign for tiger conservation, conflicting western romanticism with local populations affected by the homicidal absurdity of conserving a human predator.
Nepal through the Gurkhas' lawsuit for equal pay and pensions.
Vietnam through a church publicised refugee dispute overlapping China.
Cambodia through its enactment for a trial of the Khmer Rouge Holocaust.
Laos through Peter Tatchell's application to arrest Henry Kissinger.
Thailand through Sandra Gregory.
Burma through the Los Angeles judgment on the Unocal oil pipeline.
Sri Lanka through its call for the Tamil Tigers' banning in Britain.
East Timor through public reaction to the judgment against trying Suharto.
Papua New Guinea through WWF's Kikori mangrove logging affair.
New Zealand through its ban on British blood donations.
Nauru through the Australian civil liberty challenge on the Tampa refugees.
Fiji through its land crisis's nonracial solubility by a Commonwealth constitutional question against rent and mortgages.
Tuvalu through environmentalist challenges to America's rejection of international agreements on global warming and sea level.
Marshall Islands through the Nuclear Claims Tribunal cases.
Philippines and Malaysia through the international police investigation
in the Jaybe Ofrasio trial in Northern Ireland.
South Korea through its jurisdiction dispute with the American army.
North Korea through its apology to Japan for abductions.

Edited by author 08-27-2004 01:01 PM
More Bobby Fischer information at:

Unofficial Bobby Fischer Chess Page

Over the years I have watched the Bobby Fischer saga unfold and it's a sad tale at times. Bobby used to be my hero in chess, I only played the openings he played and tried to emulate his style...what a player! When it comes to chess Bobby has always been the ultimate player. Of course over the years Bobby has said some interesting things and then came the re-match against Boris Spassky. Fischer has every right to say what he wishes, he has that freedom. It's not what he said, it's what he did back then that got him in trouble. Defying the sanctions got him in trouble, he can spew off at the mouth all he wants, nothing wrong with that, he can spit on all the letters he wants. When he sat down and made his first move on the chessboard that's what did it. Bobby has no one to blame but himself here. To me, he will always be the best Chessplayer the world has ever known, but this is his mess, not mine. He got himself in it and he can get himself out of it.


Dale

bcause he defyed whats the problem if history has taught us ne thing chess is war y du countries kill men women children fight over the chess bd people have been pardon for worse crime we need bobby back if he chooses the government wants to crucify a 61 yr old man for playing chees stop the political bull crap it happened almost 12 yrs ago at least give him an ultimatem or fine him this country is bcoming communist we r not free to say du or go without hipacrits in govt free bobby fischer leave the king of chess alone

Does anybody have any recent news about Fischer? It seems like the last thing was the fact that he lost his appeals on August 24 or thereabouts. Since then it appears like there has only been silence. How is he? Has he been moved or is he in the same place of incarceration? Is he allowed to exercise. How is his health? Is he able to communicate with the outside world? etc. etc.
I was aware of Fischer way back before he took on Spassky in Reykjavik in 1972 for the World Championship. I recall I saw him at least twice play chess at the Manhattan Chess Club in New York City.

He created Fischerandom chess and a Fischer digital chess clock. He's opened up the game making it more interesting instead of a boring feat of memorization. He ranks as the greatest chess player ever. If chess were music, he's be next to Mozart.

The problem is his anti-Jewish paranoia which is a little sad. But even that makes some sense, If you substitute "greedy bastards" or "imperial fascists" for Fischer's "dirty Jews" then a lot of what he says is on the mark. Somebody suggested "Jewish Lawyers to Free Bobby!" That's a good idea. Maybe it would help his sanity.

Over the years, he has been ripped off by America's best esurient car salesmen. After he won the World Championship in 72, he was snubbed the White House. He never got a nickel for that movie, "Searching for Bobby Fischer" and several other things too. Apparently he was bumped off a list and a Russian gymnast was invited instead. Fischer disobeying the economic sanctions against Yugoslavia is a lot of hooey. The United States Chess Federation made money from that tournament and nobody has said anything to them. His American passport was never properly revoked and was valid when they took it from him at the airport in Japan. He's got a right to be angry.

John

Edited by author 09-05-2004 07:07 AM
You can criticize anyone and anything, except the one who rules.
Saddam maybe is gone, but not we!

Bobby seems to be in good spirits. In response to being told of Spassky's offer to share a cell with him,he replied " I don't want to share with Spassky - get me a chick"

You bet he did. And not the chick who he said he's gonna marry either. Some hot new chess player babe. Man this guy is cold.