Some preliminary thoughts:

Ques. 1: Content would be focused on areas of content and issues. One example is Joi Ito’s blog. After reviewing hers, I would consider different blogs for different content/issue areas. She has done that through content subject archives. The web of archives seems to be getting on the verge of being too complicated and off-putting to the outsider. Maybe that is OK. It seems to be serving the user’s needs.

The only current entry her blog presented was her personal response to a free speech/student growth issue she was aware of. Personalization of opinions would be limited content/issue matter that is of interest.

Ques. 2: The policy would set out the purpose of the blog in terms the students can relate to, e.g., blogging is like our classroom discussion in a way.

Limitations on use, content and access would be spelled out.

Cautions tied to limitations on use and to real world concerns to explain and sensitze the students such as public access, concern for others’ feelings, integrity, stalking potential, the need to consider the potential for damage to one’s own reputation by impolitic or imprudent disclosure.

The teacher needs to consider his/her response to student disclosures and to safety, security and privacy concerns