......already divorced???

Mike, why don't you go destroy some documents! IQS must be in the crapper just like ThomasNet probably is.

Vickrey auctions are much studied in economic literature, but are not particularly common in practice. A slight generalized variant of a Vickrey auction, named generalized second-price auction, which is different from the VCG mechanism, is known to be used in Google's and Yahoo!'s online advertisement programmes....

what kind of auction does Thomas use?

What loyalty....

http://forums.thomasnet.com/viewtopic.php?...8fafa7f40617f434400

ThomasNet Forums Index -> ThomasNet Café (General Discussion) -> Fred Siver Cleveland, Ohio ThomasNet Rep. Child P0rnography
    
   Fred Siver Cleveland, Ohio ThomasNet Rep. Child P0rnography
Guest






  Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 1:22 pm
Post subject: Fred Siver Cleveland, Ohio ThomasNet Rep. Child P0rnography

--------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
 
Investigation by Ohio Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force
Results in Indictments of Rodney Callender and Fred Siver

CLEVELAND-Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Bill Mason announced that Rodney Callender was indicted for soliciting s*x from an undercover police officer, and Fred Siver was indicted for sharing child p0rnography. The investigations were conducted by the Ohio Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force, a state-wide law enforcement task force chaired by Prosecutor Mason. Maryland Department of State Police, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Office, and the Rocky River Police Department were part of the investigation involving Callender. The Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Office was part of the investigation of Siver.

Fred Siver, 42, of Solon, made child p0rnography available for sharing from his computer at his residence between June 2008 and November 2008. On January 15, 2009, members of the Ohio ICAC Task Force, including officers from the Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Office, executed a search warrant at Siver's residence. A forensic examination of Siver's computers revealed additional child p0rnographic videos and photographs saved to the computers' hard drives. Siver was indicted on 49 counts of pandering s*xually oriented matter involving a minor (40 second degree felonies and 9 fourth degree felonies), 5 counts of illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material or performance, fifth degree felonies, and 1 count of possessing criminal tools, a fifth degree felony.

.....here it is in google

Results for: fred siver

Indictments of Rodney Callender and Fred SiverFred Siver, 42, of Solon, made child pornography available for sharing from his computer at his residence between June 2008 and November 2008. ...
prosecutor.cuyahogacounty.us/PrintContent.aspx?type... - Cached - Similar


Fred Siver Cleveland, Ohio... | ThomasNet® Forums1 post - 1 author - Last post: 15 hours ago
Investigation by Ohio Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Results in Indictments of Rodney Callender and Fred Siver ...
forums.thomasnet.com/viewtopic.php?t=58377&sid... - 15 hours ago - Similar

This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the newstherefore just in the news
This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the newstherefore just in the news
This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the newstherefore just in the news
This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the newstherefore just in the news.

give the story the story new and when you give the story the story is newgive the story the story new and when you give the story the story is newgive the story the story new and when you give the story the story is newgive the story the story new and when you give the story the story is newgive the story the story new and when you give the story the story is newgive the story the story new and when you give the story the story is newgive the story the story new and when you give the story the story is newgive the story the story new and when you give the story the story is new

That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news.

 News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and This was just in the news. That the new was in. News is in the news and therefore just in the news was just in the news.

WTF, boring.

This is serious. You rumor mongers out there are giving Fred a bad deal. I'll bet that at least 10 of the 49 counts are bogus. We just learned that Fred was terminated using some sort of "morals clause" in his senior contract even before being found guilty of anything. A morals clause? Enforced by EM, Alberto, and Tommy? Give us a break.

As an independent contractor, Fred had every right to pursue another career. With our renewals in the toilet, what was he supposed to do to take care of all those kids? Knowing Fred, I'll bet that he even asked permission. Corporate probably reviewd the jpegs and only edited the ones of EM, Alberto, Tom and various farm animals before giving approval.

Seriously, why didn't they wait until end of year? Would it have killed them to spin Fred as the official Thomas photographer until our renewals were done?

  
....to jail we go................see the success of the prosecution

Trial Date Defendant


07/08/2009 Michael Moon


Michael Moon

Location: Cleveland, OH
Trial Date: 07/08/2009
Disposition Date: 07/09/2009

Charges: Pandering Sexually Oriented Material Involving a Minor X4 Illegal Use of a Minor in Nudity-Oriented Material X46 Possessing Crimminal Tools X2

Disposition: 20 years in prison; Tier II Sexual Offender

Charge Detail: Defendant was caught at Hopkins International Airport trying to board a plane while in the possession of 46 images of child pornography

Defendant: Michael Moon

Case Number: CR-09-522061-A

http://www.ohioicac.org/prosecutions.aspx

Edited by author 08-26-2009 01:30 PM
Ohio Internet Crimes Against Children task force officers watch, wait for predators

Posted by Mark Puente/Plain Dealer Reporter August 22, 2009 18:14PM

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Bill Mason formed a local task force in 2000 to target Internet predators. He expanded it statewide in 2003, and it became the Ohio Internet Crimes Against Children task force. Every county in Ohio is represented.

The unit recently received about $1.7 million in federal grants to hire more investigators and keep operating. Mason allowed a reporter and photographer inside the facility last week for the first time to see how investigators target child predators.
 
"We don't sit back and wait for these predators to strike," he said. "We proactively root them out. Sexual predators have changed their tactics with the advent of the Internet. They are no longer just targeting children at the malls and playgrounds but also preying upon them in their homes."

Child pornography is a big business across the globe, with people spending tens of millions of dollars on it every year. Statewide, the task force has arrested nearly 2,000 people since 2003. Cases prosecuted in Cuyahoga County jumped from 12 in 2000 to 127 last year.

The task force goes after people who buy, sell and trade child pornography, as well as people who try to arrange meetings with children.
The Cuyahoga County task force has six permanent employees. Scores of other officers rotate from departments around the county and spend time there each week. They surf the Web seven days a week. The officers don't get bored; chatters chat around the clock.

The office has eight computers for trolling the Web and is about half the size of a basketball court. Mug shots of convicted predators line the walls. Another large room is stuffed with about 200 seized computers.
Within seconds of entering the chat rooms while posing as children, the officers are flooded with requests from people identifying themselves as adults. The questions typically start out harmless, but many eventually turn sexual. Officers never approach other chatters first and make clear to chatters that the users they are posing as are children.

Rick McGinnis, an investigator for Cuyahoga County who works with the task force, said officers have to immerse themselves in the culture of children to not blow their cover. Predators pay close attention to the words officers use and even how fast they type, he added.

"You have to talk like a girl," he said. "You need to know about Hanna Montana. You have to get at their level. "

The investigations begin once chatters solicit sex or send pornographic images.

Computers log every chat, and detectives subpoena the chatter's information, such as billing address, from Internet providers. They also use file-sharing programs to track how child porn, stored as computer files, is traded and shared on the Internet.

Some of the more than 200 computers seized by the Ohio Internet Crimes Against Children task force.

The process can take three weeks before detectives obtain search warrants to seize computers.

The Internet allows people to disseminate child pornography with anonymity, McGinnis said. Perpetrators cannot peddle it on street corners, and child predators are not usually career criminals, he added.
He compared child predators to drug addicts seeking dope to get high.
"You never know who is behind the computer screen," McGinnis said. "They have their blinders on and are fixated on a target."

A longtime Cleveland detective, who did not want to be identified, does the forensic searches on seized computers. All movies have to be watched because many people embed child pornography inside normal movies, he said.
The perpetrators, he said, never delete material from their computers.
"A collector keeps everything," the 22-year officer said. "Unfortunately, I have to look at all those movies. It's something that has to be done."
The hardest part of his job is watching children being victimized, he said. He described the images as horrific.

"You see the fear in their eyes," he said about the kids. "I turn the sound down on my computer. In some movies they seem like drones. Some don't show emotion."

The officer has been on the task force for four years and has been investigating crimes against children even longer. He declined to be identified so his friends and family don't know what he does at work. He is a father and said the job takes an emotional toll.

His work makes him more suspicious of people he encounters.

"It makes me mistrust many people," he said. "Anyone could be a suspect. A lot of times it can be your next-door neighbor."

"There is a huge difference between perception and reality," Goldberg said. "This gets to the core of your soul. If I was a fiction writer, I couldn't make this stuff up."

Some of the felony cases expected in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court this week.

Fred Siver, 42, of Solon: Arraignment Monday. He's accused of sharing child pornography on the Internet from June through November 2008. Siver is charged with 49 counts of pandering sexually-oriented material involving a minor, five counts of illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material and possessing a criminal tool, his computer.

Stephen Holman, 38, of Cleveland: Trial continues Monday for the former mortgage loan officer facing 19 charges involving $1.5 million in fraudulent loans for two Solon homes. Five co-defendants pleaded guilty and are expected to testify.

Rodney Callender, 45, of Cleveland: Arraignment Monday. Prosecutors say he sought sex with a 14-year-old girl, actually an undercover police officer, chatting on the Internet between Jan. 29 and March 8. He's charged with 10 counts of importuning and possessing a criminal tool, his computer. Callender pleaded guilty in 1992 to a similar offense in Michigan.

Fred, what were you thinking? Actually, not...............

CHARGES
Statute Description
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(2) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(5) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(5) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(5) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(5) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(5) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(5) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(5) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(5) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.322.A(5) PANDERING SEXUALLY ORIENTED MATTER INVOLVING A MINOR
2907.323.A(3) MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE
2907.323.A(3) MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE
2907.323.A(3) MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE
2907.323.A(3) MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE
2907.323.A(3) MINOR IN NUDE MATERIAL OR PERFORMANCE
2923.24.A POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS

BWAWAWAWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

I can think of a few people (in fact, im sitting with one) who are going to do some celebratory shots over this one!

They're going to treat you so well in the can you fat sack of smug shit!!!!!!

Is he still representing Thomasnet? The Cleveland site still says he is. How can this be? Certainly Thomasnet can't want someone like this representing them, can they?