| Who | When |
Messages | |
|
|
|
xradiographer
|
1
|
 |
|
03-30-2004 11:52 PM ET (US)
|
|
Edited by author 04-01-2004 10:25 AM
I'm still not quite sure what differentiates a "photograph" from an "art wrok" [sic]. Photos are art works. But not all artworks are photos. And not even all photos are art. They are artificial (ie, do not grow on trees). But, consider the snapshot....
Now, what I throw into snapshots is photo-based, and continues to lie primarily in the photo-image field. An artwork can be photo-based, but will (probably) veer off in other directions, where the original image alone is not the most important element.
Still, can't say that the concepts have gelled for me, can I?
|
| Julie
|
2
|
|
|
03-31-2004 03:52 PM ET (US)
|
|
That picture of mike is realy hot. Too bad he is married.
|
| Jason
|
3
|
|
|
04-01-2004 09:26 AM ET (US)
|
|
Too bad he's not gay. I'd hit it.
|
| xradiographer
|
4
|
|
|
04-01-2004 10:25 AM ET (US)
|
|
|
| Mephistolisa Zillah
|
5
|
|
|
06-20-2004 08:37 PM ET (US)
|
|
That Mike P. is pretty cute too.
|
| Mephistolisa Zillah
|
6
|
|
|
06-20-2004 08:38 PM ET (US)
|
|
The bemused one.
|
| xradiographer
|
7
|
|
|
10-25-2004 09:32 AM ET (US)
|
|
My differentiation between "artworks" and "snapshots" still hasn't gelled.
But photos are, for me, not only primarily photo-based but single-photo based. Artworks that come from photos are mostly collages.
Although that isn't strictly, true, either.
It's all arbitrary, I guess. Or nearly so.
|
| Paul
|
8
|
|
|
11-04-2004 09:53 AM ET (US)
|
|
|
| lori byrd
|
9
|
|
|
03-13-2005 01:38 AM ET (US)
|
|
hank fells is yellow, spaz is still trying to be one of da kids, and that fucking larry photographer guy (yeah i can see you) looks like the cowardly lion...al fine examples of scran'in creeps
|
| Raymond
|
10
|
|
|
06-07-2005 11:52 AM ET (US)
|
|
I told you you'd like this.. I told you!
|
| Alicia
|
11
|
|
|
09-21-2005 06:32 PM ET (US)
|
|
|
| |
Messages 12-13 deleted by topic administrator between 07-23-2006 02:06 AM and 07-21-2006 08:59 AM |
