More info. here courtesy of another poster on the raging bull board.

Called I.R. Thursday at 11:45 am EST. (305-828-3418). Talked to a P.R. person named Alfredo. Asked for an update on time line of any news to be released. He referred me to the web site were it mentions strategy and partners.

I mentioned the Dec, 11th P.R. and status about any follow
up. He finally stated that a P.R. would come out soon.

I asked him to define "soon" (as in a couple months, weeks,
etc.). He finally said "next week".

I asked If any negativity would be in the P.R. He said
the news would be positive and that things are going good.

My take is that the P.R. would be of a "business plan" nature. I don't know exactly who Alfredo is in the
hierarchy of things at CLYW.

This is, of course, my own opinion based upon my own interpretation of the conversation.

Downto$0,001 i read your posts and your nothing but negative crap looks like we got a down ramper in the room.
If you dont like the stock why do you come back and keep writing for? You will eat your words very shortly my friend.
By the way i love the new website keep up the good work Calypso your heading in the write direction.

dear Mike, i took my small loss allready. i don't own stocks clyw anymore. i only want to make sure that other investors read links and check sec data before they put their savings in this ticker. did you check the links i gave you ? did you pick up the phone to call mayor shareholders ? did you find the phonenumbers in the first place ? have you visited the hq ? how is the production going ? is the first shipment out ? i did my best to think possitive but i find nothing but red flags. good luck anyway.
ps: i try to keep informed on all stocks , clyw included.
i have to agree on one thing : the web site is really looking fabulous.

Calypso & Ericsson?...

Just speculating and hoping for some wiser input from some of the vets out there.

This is a paste from an Ericsson PR released today.

"The first phase of the launch introduces new unique radio features to meet all coverage and capacity needs in the most cost-effective manner possible, enabling the best utilization of invested equipment. New unique capabilities for larger cell coverage are combined with features for flexible capacity expansions within the same base station."

I honestly don't grasp this techy jargon so well but is it such a stretch to link "New unique capabilities for larger cell coverage are combined with features for flexible capacity expansions within the same base station" to Calypso's ASNAP technology? It sounds like it fits to me.

Here's a link to the full article.

http://cbs.marketwatch.com/tools/quotes/ne...905060743C4%7D&symb=

TIA for all and any views. ralph

downto$0,001 i live in miami i have visited the company and i have seen the tecnology work.
This isnt some prank company but there are alot of cell phone companys out there wanting to know whats going on heck someone even went to the trouble of BREAKING INTO CALYPSO HQ LAST WEEK. It was a pro job and the alarm system was tripped. I spoke to them and they said they never found anything. Very interesting it makes me even more excited about the comapy even more.
I HAVE SEEN PHOTOS OF THE FACTORY AND I EVEN KNOW SOMEONE THAT HAS BEEN THERE AND VISITED SO THE COMPANY IS FOR REAL. Its just cheaper to produce the phones down there
Where do you live downto$0,001 i thought you might have gone to miami for a visit to check it all out???
sounds like you angry cause so lost some $$$ what price did you get in at and when did you get out???

Mike - thanks for your information,...no disrespect here,...but,... you are asking this board to take what you have posted as valid information.

1-how do we really know that you visted Calypso's HQ,
2-how do we know that you have the technical ability to discern and analyize the technology you were shown was "working" and in fact is this seamless system CLYW has patented,
3-how do we know that the HQ's were actually broken in to,...did they show you the entry point(s), and would you know the difference between a break-in and interior work being done,
4-how do we know that that the "photos you were shown were pcitures of the factory"?,...and everyone knows a someone who has visited the facility.
5- for all we know you might just be an insider or principal of the company that is posting on multiple boards to keep the pps up, this keeping a stream of income

answer those inquiries and we'll see if your information deserves attention.

again,...no disrespect intended but your positng suggests that we blindly believe your post.

this board any many others who have individuals who are actually invested in CLYW are quite pissed that the company management has continually misrepresented its past pr's stating and update on the companys listing status, progress with interested parties in their ASNAP technology and,...the infamous $500 China Telecom procurement agreement.

so please understand,...this is a pinksheet company that professes incredible technology,...doesn't have any credible financials,...psots nothing to prove its ascertains,....etc. nothing new,...just a different spin on airspace.

and for this boards entertainment pleasure>>>

here is some DD on CLYW,...granted it is slanted to the negative side,...but at least you have a better perspective of both sides/scenarios playing out or as they say,...."now you have the rest of the story."
============================================================

Let me go back to the "$500 MILLION CHINA TELECOM CONTRACT". Without digging details of the contract (will do so later), just look at the front and the end of the contract, you can easily see some red flags.

http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/print_fili...02%255C&symbol=CLYW

The front of the agreement:

  EXHIBIT 10.1

PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

INDUSTRIAS DE TELECOMUNICACIONES

AMERICANAS - ATEL S.A.

(A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF

CALYPSO WIRELESS, INC.)

 CHINA TELECOM CHANGZHOU

>TLECOMMUNICATION BUREAU <

(CHINA TELECOM)

(1) Notice it is a "PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT ", it is not a contract, it is not binding nor is it a real agreement;

(2) Notice the obvious wrong spelling of "TLECOMMUNICATION" on the front page of the agreement;

(3) There is no official name of " CHINA TELECOM CHANGZHOU TLECOMMUNICATION BUREAU". The official name of the counterpart they are referring to should be 'Jiang Su Telecom Co..Ltd, ChangZhou Branch", and their website is at:

(3a) Now that might not seem like a big deal on appearances,....but on a legal level it could be argued that because of the spelling the contract/procurement agreement was not in fact with "the" China Telecom listed on the Nasdaq, but with this company specified. Granted a legal position but none the less could hold up as a legal defense should it come to that.

http://www.czinfo.net/changzhou-telecom/

(4) So what ChangZhou Branch does:

http://www.czinfo.net/changzhou-telecom/qyjs.htm

http://www.czinfo.net/changzhou-telecom/yjhh.htm

In Sept 6, 2000, ChangZhou Telecommunication and Post Branch was established. With the delegation of authority from Jiang Su (Province) Telecom Co, the Branch is responsible for the construction, maintenance, marketing, and services of telecom network for Chang Zhou City."

(5) But in all subsequent PRs and CLYW's website, the company just call it a deal of "$500 million Contract with China Telecom". They changed to two very powerful words.

(6) Also remember China is the most corrupted country, I won't be surprised to see they might have bribed some local officials in China to sign such a no-bidding and fake agreement.

(7) A $500 million contract would require at least the signatures of the CEO of China Telecom, and possible signatures from Minister of China Telecommunication and Post, and the Prime Minister. Nortel recently signed a $100 million contract with China Mobile, it was signed with the presence of Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien in China.


(8) So who signed the contract ?


The end of the agreement:

(from original Calypso/China Telecom SEC filing)

Industrias de Telecomunicaciones China Telecom Changzhou

Americanas, ATEL, SA. Telecommunication Bureau
(Sub of Calypso Wireless, Inc.) (China Telecom)
By:
   ------------------------------- -----------------------------
Name: Name:
Title: Chief Operations Officer Title: Vice Director

(9) The management team of ChangZhou Telecom:

http://www.czinfo.net/changzhou-telecom/ldbz.htm

(note) If you notice there is No-One that has the title of Vice Director.

(10) According to news source from China, the vice-president of Jiang Su Telecom Co..Ltd has flatly denied that Branch had signed such a deal,

(11) There is an English report from China Business Weekly. They quoted from some other China Telecom officials on the deal:

http://www1.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc/2003-.../content_251075.htm

(note) “Several officials with China Telecom, contacted by China Business Weekly, were unable to confirm the deal.

Shen Shaoai, an official in charge of China Telecom Group's planning for wireless business, said she had not heard of a deal between China Telecom and Calypso.

However, she said she could not confirm a deal which Calypso claimed was signed before the split-off of China Telecom.

In 2001, China Telecom was spun into two companies during a broad restructuring of China's telecoms industry.

After such a spin-off, a subsidiary would be unlikely to sign such a big deal without the headquarters' approval, Shen said.

Changzhou Telecommunications Bureau officials were not available for comment.

Wei Leping, chief engineer of China Telecom Group, dismissed reports that such a deal had been clinched. He refused to comment further.”

============================================================

well,...that is what i am able to discover and discern as far. There is some info on Robert Leon I am working on and will forward if it warrants.

Here is the piece I found when Robert Leon was the CEO and their deals with Air Media Now. It happened about two years ago, but as you can see, the deals never follow through and nothing has happened.
 
In March 18, 2002, Calypso Wireless terminated merger talk with Syndeos Group and formed an alliance. Robert Leon was the CEO:
 
http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m0EIN/2...92/p1/article.jhtml
 
A few weeks later, in April, 2002, miracle happened between the two companies:
 
http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/?articleID=2735
 
"Air Media Now! Inc., and Calypso Wireless Inc., successfully conducted their ASNAP wireless LAN to GSM/GPRS handoff. This technology will enable mobile subscribers to enjoy broadband connectivity in WLAN access zones.

Air Media Now stated that Calypso Wireless ASNAP technology will be commercially available through its retail partners in the coming months. Subscribers will use the ASNAP technology that is inside a WLAN card or mobile device. The result will enable users to have broadband access anywhere that local GSM/GPRS operators and Air Media Now have NowZones."
 
The news was picked up by Country Investor:
 
http://www.countryinvestor.com/story.cfm?story_id=316
 
Where is Air Media Now? Answer,...going out of business? The company is dead and no PRs. I typed in www.AirMediaNow .com on my browser and what came up was "Domain Name For Sale" !

Do they still own exclusive license to resell Calypso Wireless ?
 
"As a distributor and global leader of broadband wireless web services technology, its exclusive license to resell Calypso Wireless ASNAP(TM) technology solves problems inherent to seamless hand offs between cellular and wireless networks."

Well,..if that is true then if AM is "the exclusive distributor of Calypso's technology,...how is Calypso going to make sales if their "exclusive distributor and liscensing holder" is out of business?

So what i see occuring is the same ole story from two years ago presented today.

Now this is information that they,CLYW, has released through their pr's via different media sites. I'm not making any of this stuff up,...its all in CLYW PR's.

it appears that CLYW has some questions to answer and maybe the SEC enforcement division will be the way to go.

dear nlightn, thanks for your message, i think you answered all mike's questions here and save me about 3 hours precious time.

Air media one - Interesting? However, Does the recently acquired patent and newly founded Wi-Fi alliance not present calypso as an intriguing investment to a bigger and better company as opposed to air media one?? These two significant developments may help gain calypso some real respect and acceptance??

I've had a reply from Calypso; they're planning to visit 3GSM in a fortnight. More when I've had a chance to chat to them... but yes, it would give them respect and acceptance - if it all works as described on the tin.

this is from Wi-Fi Alliances website>>>

Membership Requirements

The requirements for membership in the Wi-Fi Alliance are that a company must:
Publicly display a legitimate business interest in the IEEE 802.11 HR standard for wireless LANs
Publicly support the IEEE 802.11 HR standard wireless LANs by shipping products or enabling technology or deploying for public access products employing the IEEE 802.11 standard for wireless LANs, or by issuing press releases in support of the IEEE 802.11 HR standard for wireless LANs
Pay the $25,000 annual dues. The initial annual dues are payable upon membership acceptance.
http://www.wi-fialliance.com/OpenSection/requirements.asp?TID=6



now,...has CLYW actually paid the $25,000 ? which would mean that they are a member in good standing by Wi-Fi Alliance ?,...and actually a member.

Or,...has CLYW just applied for membership?

or is this PR just taking some editorial privileges ? here is the CLYW statement:

"MIAMI LAKES, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 9, 2004--Calypso Wireless, Inc. (OTC:CLYW - News), announced today that the company has joined the Wi-Fi alliance -- the leading industry association"

????????

UPDATE:

so,...based on the PR from CLYW i called Wi-Fi Alliance. i spoke to a representative of the techncial department.

i stated that i am a shareholder in CLYW and they had released a PR this morning stating that they have become a member of Wi-Fi Alliance.

i asked if in fact CLYW was a member in good standing or had they just filed an application for membership ?
she stated that "CLYW was a member."

i asked if they had paid the $25,000 annual fee for membership acceptance?
she stated that "CLYW had paid the $25,000 that that was the only way to become a member."

so that is what i have as far.

is CLYW and its ASNAP technology authentic,...lets see what Wi-Fi Alliance discerns.

i have posted what i have a manner in which to view this company and its technology form all sides.

i must say what i don't appreciate is their silence. my god,...they have a USPTO patent for this technology.

my other concern is this ,...if they do have an authentic technology and their patent will come into play as the main protector of that technology,...what funds do they have at their disposal to vigorously protect their patent in a courtroom scenario when you have players like MOT, NOK, and the like with legal departments that can keep paper work firing at them so to keep your technology locked up in a legal battle.

"Calypso Wireless is in negotiations with one of the largest cable companies in the U.S. to license and purchase Calypso's ASNAP(tm) technology and related products to the cable company."

IF this is true and they do get an agreement in place with a big fish, could that possibly give them a financial backer in court? Legal fees in exchange for future license fees?

CLYW is a scam.