Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Topic: Postal Retirees
Views: 70270, Unique: 15772 
Subscribers: 26
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Discussion Forum for Retired Postal Employees
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
   << 1460-1475  1444-1459 of 1475  1428-1443 >>
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
redeye44Person was signed in when posted  1444
05-18-2009 08:12 AM ET (US)
ret'd 2/29/04, part-time workers put into the unemploy funds for their state and that entitles you to unemployment benefits. I also got unemployment compensation. Don't matter if you have independent income. If they take from you, you get it back when laid off. All states do that as I know of. I retired 01/06 and drew conpensation for last 12 months after my lay off of a part-time job. And I remember you "I Want Out" and
glad you are enjoying your retirement. I love mine and life is good.
I Want OutPerson was signed in when posted  1445
05-18-2009 08:31 AM ET (US)
Hey, Redeye, I remember you, too. I think I'm just going to milk this unemployment thing for as long as I can, now. I start Social Security in less than 3 years anyway. Getting 'laid off' was a good thing for me right now. Think I'll go fishing every day for a while.
redeye44Person was signed in when posted  1446
05-19-2009 07:15 AM ET (US)
I Want Out, I'm doing the same thing on getting the full twelve months
of unemployment since I did pay into it. It's golfing everyday than fishing for me but both are great activities for us old(I mean Ole) folks.
SebringLadPerson was signed in when posted  1447
05-20-2009 01:42 PM ET (US)
Hi all,
  I retired in Nov.2007(on my 55th birthday) with 32 yrs.service and have never been happier!!
  I did work for 1 month for the P.O. during the Rural Route count,good money for p/t work!
 Take care all !!
ret'd 2/29/04Person was signed in when posted  1448
05-20-2009 02:20 PM ET (US)
Now that I have time to take care of myself I'm more fit and in better health than I think I ever had been in my life. I work out every morning before breakfast and by the time I'm finished it doesn't matter if I get anything else done the rest of the day, I'm set physically and mentally.
Joe B JrPerson was signed in when posted  1449
05-20-2009 06:10 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 05-20-2009 06:10 PM
I am planning to retire soon. I am married ,I want to know what percent I need for survivor benefits for my wife to be covered under my medical benefit is 50% ok if I die first ? Or do I have to do More? I am under CSRS.
redeye44Person was signed in when posted  1450
05-21-2009 07:30 AM ET (US)
Joe B. Jr., go with the 100% which basically gives her 55% of your retirement if you die first. That will only reduce your retirement about
10% and you won't see that once it gets started. And you won't pay taxes on that amount. She will once she starts drawing it. And she will continue to be eligible for your health insurance for the rest of her life.
ret'd 2/29/04Person was signed in when posted  1451
05-21-2009 07:52 AM ET (US)
Check into that. I believe that although the survivor benefit for our pension is 55%, that's 55% of the annuitant's unreduced benefit, which should come out to about 60% of what the annuitant is actually drawing.
SebringLadPerson was signed in when posted  1452
05-21-2009 07:00 PM ET (US)
The survivor deduction for the full,un reduced survivor annuity is based on 55% of gross monthly annuity!!
ret'd 2/29/04Person was signed in when posted  1453
05-22-2009 08:00 AM ET (US)
Which means, in the case of our household, my wife would get a survivor benefit of about 61% gross of what we'd be getting if I were still around, and net an even larger chunk of that because her health plan cost will go down. The "55% of unreduced gross benefit" means she'd be getting 63% of what we currently net. The bottom line is more than it appears.
SebringLadPerson was signed in when posted  1454
05-22-2009 04:01 PM ET (US)
Correct ret'd 2,taxes,health insurance,etc. would all be lower thus a larger net dollar amount.
All in all,it's a great retirement !!!!!!
SebringLadPerson was signed in when posted  1455
05-22-2009 04:03 PM ET (US)
But we really get screwed on the Social Security penalty...thanks Reagan !!!!!!
ret'd 2/29/04Person was signed in when posted  1456
05-22-2009 05:50 PM ET (US)
Yes, but I can live with the WEP. For one thing, it's fair, even though I resent it being applied retroactively, in my case years after I switched from SS to CSRS.

The other thing is that it's still a great return for an annuity. I'll start getting SS at the end of this year and in less than 12 months I'll get back everything I ever paid into that system. For the next 30-40 years or whatever it's all gravy.

My wife only worked sporadically off and on, mostly part-time to help her mother with medical bills, and not at all since '91, and she also gets back everything she paid into it in the first year. You can't beat a return like that even if it doesn't amount to a lot of dollars.
Joe B JrPerson was signed in when posted  1457
06-02-2009 05:33 PM ET (US)
I still am confused. What is the minimal percentage amount I would have to take so my wife would receive health benefits if I died first?
retiredatlastPerson was signed in when posted  1458
06-02-2009 08:29 PM ET (US)
Deleted by author 06-02-2009 09:03 PM
ret'd 2/29/04Person was signed in when posted  1459
06-02-2009 08:35 PM ET (US)
NARFE (Nat'l Assoc of Active and Retired Federal Employees) has a monthly magazine that addresses all these sort of questions. It's very handy and informative.
RSS link What's this?
   << 1460-1475  1444-1459 of 1475  1428-1443 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.