Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Topic: Postal Retirees
Views: 62504, Unique: 13606 
Subscribers: 25
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Discussion Forum for Retired Postal Employees
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
           1420-1435 of 1435  1404-1419 >>
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom   
Post a new message
 
ridersPerson was signed in when posted  1435
04-29-2008 09:38 AM ET (US)
I retired after 34 years and 3 months of carrying mail. I can't believe it will be 3 years this August since I retired. I miss some of the people but not the work. I hate to see the price of gas so high as I like to ride and drive a lot!!
ret'd 2/29/04Person was signed in when posted  1434
04-27-2008 05:48 PM ET (US)
I've decided what to do with our stimulus check. I'm researching House and Senate races to find the close ones. Then I'll send the money to the Democrat to assist in his victory. That's the best use of the money for America I can think of.
RetiradoPerson was signed in when posted  1433
04-27-2008 05:14 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 04-27-2008 05:40 PM
I noticed that the last entry was in 2004
is that true? Or I just don't know how to use this site.
Almost Retirado..............NEVER MIND, I FIGURED IT OUT.
but thanks anyway.Will retire in june, after 35 years as a Carrier.
Hope to have you old timers in my corner.

                       New Timer
ret'd 2/29/04Person was signed in when posted  1432
03-07-2008 03:15 PM ET (US)
Spare us any more "Republican help". I can't stand much more.
redeye44Person was signed in when posted  1431
03-07-2008 10:17 AM ET (US)
Don't worry, the democrats will try to screw all this up. They want
to overturn the tax breaks the white house is giving us. Make it
permanent since it does help everyone.
ret'd 2/29/04Person was signed in when posted  1430
01-29-2008 10:11 AM ET (US)
I don't think the intent is to be fair, but to target the moneys to where they think they will be most effective. The jury is still out on that judgment.
Bipolar DavePerson was signed in when posted  1429
01-28-2008 10:07 PM ET (US)
Thanks guys.

As I thought about it more, I think the House may have been intending to exclude SS recipients who have no other income because they usually pay no income tax on those benefits. I don't know if that's fair or not. (I'm sure I'd think it wasn't if I was affected.)
ret'd 2/29/04Person was signed in when posted  1428
01-28-2008 02:51 PM ET (US)
"But it would leave out about 20 million senior citizens living chiefly on Social Security. They wouldn't get rebate checks unless they have at least $3,000 earned income or pay income taxes based on other sources such as earnings, interest, investments or private pension plans."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080125/ap_on_go_co/economy_stimulus

But don't spend it now. The senate has yet to pass its version, and then there's that obstacle in the White House to overcome if it doesn't suit his fancy.
retiredatlastPerson was signed in when posted  1427
01-28-2008 01:11 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 01-28-2008 02:34 PM
Bipolar Dave /m1426 I did read recently that those who paid taxes on "income obtained from interest etc" would qualify. Can't remember where I read it.
Bipolar DavePerson was signed in when posted  1426
01-28-2008 12:26 PM ET (US)
Haven't visited here for a while, and it's nice to see some familiar names from back in '03 and '04. How are things in the Sunshine state, I Want Out?

Regarding the economic stimulus bill the government is working on for "wage earners"; I read that the House version would not benefit those whose sole income is Social Security.

I wonder if CSRS recipients who have no other income would fall into the same category. I woudn't be surprised. Any thoughts?
Lacy LaruePerson was signed in when posted  1425
01-12-2008 06:19 PM ET (US)
I'm 47. I've been officially retired now (OPM-medical retirement) for approximately one year. I had 21 years of service at retirement. What I'd like to know is this...how likely is it that OPM will ask for periodic supportive medical documentation to prove I am still disabled. This could pose a problem if we decide to relocate....as I could lose my close connection with my good long-standing Physician....the one who saw me through the entire ordeal. I had an attorney also, but don't know if that is a plus or not....I mean I know they "can" require periodic or yearly documentation, but percentage-wise, how often does this really happen...and if they 'DO' require it, how comprehensive must it be? Can the Doctor simply state that the patient condition is same and has not changed in regards to the original restrictions?
I Want OutPerson was signed in when posted  1424
12-04-2007 06:08 AM ET (US)
Deleted by author 12-20-2007 08:08 AM
ret'd 2/29/04Person was signed in when posted  1423
12-04-2007 04:12 AM ET (US)
/m1415 The new annuity statement is available at the OPM site for the new year. I was able to change my federal tax witholding as desired.

After doing so, I tinkered with the Federal Tax Witholding Calculator and discovered a couple of tips if you want to use it.

In the first box, My Monthly Payment Before Deductions, enter 1/12 of your taxable income for '08. In the third box, Number of Allowances I Can Claim, add 1 to whatever you will put on your tax return (same as you could do on Form W-4 if there was only one income earner in the family).

Example: I take an IRA distribution each year in whatever amount will bring our taxable income up to the top of the 10% marginal income tax bracket, simply to max out that lowest bracket. For 2008, that will give us a taxable income of $33,950. The tax on that for married (2) with the standard deduction is about $1,605.

Plugging in 1/12 of $33,950 into the first box, and 3 in the third box calculates a monthly witholding amount of $133, or $1,596 for the year.

Close enough. I like to have to write the IRS a little check each year just so when they cash it I'll know they got my return OK.
ret'd 2/29/04Person was signed in when posted  1422
11-15-2007 11:59 AM ET (US)
On the Notice of Annuity Adjustment you got last year showing Gross Monthly amounts, that's what it's based on. It's not based on what you would have got had you not elected survivor benefits.
redeye44Person was signed in when posted  1421
11-15-2007 11:53 AM ET (US)
ret'd 2/29/04 or I want out, is the cola based on your annuity statement amount shown on the OPM statement or is the gross amount that includes the survivor benefit amount that's not shown on the annuity statement? Seems like our SB is hidden from us once enrolled and was just wondering if it factored in with our gross amount when determining our cola increase.
ret'd 2/29/04Person was signed in when posted  1420
11-15-2007 10:11 AM ET (US)
When I worked in Finance at the PO, we had problems with banks not crediting our employees' Direct Deposits on the paid date. They'd wait until they actually received the funds. Employees were docked overdraft charges or fees for dropping below minimum balances.

This isn't legal. These institutions are required to make the deposit of Treasury payments to the individual's account on the date specified, regardless of when the bank receives the funds itself.

I wish I had made note of the regulation that spelled it out. I had to quote it a number of times to banks to get them on track with our employees' paychecks. (Once I brought it to their attention, they complied without argument. Either they realized they'd been caught or they were ignorant of the rule.)
RSS link What's this?
           1420-1435 of 1435  1404-1419 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2006 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.