It's that time again, we have completed the trials for 2003/2004 and we tried out a different format for the adults. While it is fresh in the minds can we have some debate as to whether that format worked, and what format do we feel will produce the best team with the most entrants for next year. Any volunteers for involvement on the Trials committee, we'll be interested in hearing from you.

Personally I think the trials where spot on. The only thing that we need to do is get the entry forms out a lot earlier. The sooner the dates go on the calendar the better it will be. People will then have to make a commitment to either do the trials or do something else, they then can’t complain about it clashing with everything else.

So come on folks lets have the positives on what to do to make it better for yourselves.

Thanx Robin.

personaly i think the trails were great this year doin it over the 2 center's make them alot better!

Blimey!! I expected nothing but negative comments! Nice to see I have been proved wrong, let's keep it up!

BURNLEY WAS PANTS

Worsley was pants

yea ok u 2 cant bowl if u think that!!! ther easy lanes!!!! learn 2 bowl.

I thought both centers were great. Same again next year.

Trials were great. However I still cannot understand the debate year after year. No matter what the format of the trials, everyone is under the same conditions.

2 centres or 1, 12 games or 3, I'll trial. My only comment would be that for the womens section it is expensive when there generally aren't any more players than needed for a team entering the trials.