Edited by author 03-30-2005 07:26 AM
The F160's are a nice device. I have four of them I plan to upgrade to the F1000. The main reason is that I run four of them on the same computer and it takes a lot of computer resource. The F1000 will have a chip in it that will run the program and offload that function from the computer.

If anyone wants an F160, I will sell one for half the price of the F1000 when that is announced.

On the topic of scalar octaves, this is a difficult question to answer, as I developed and tested them after studying papers at the Global Scaling site <http://www.aw-verlag.ch/Global-Scaling_EN.htm>;.

My goal with scalar octaves was to cut frequency broadcast times with the ABPA by more than 50% and I suspected that any scalar octave would have the same effect as the primary frequency. The former has proved to be a reliable assumption, although I always use the primary frequency as a carrier wave (which you will not be able to do in many cases with the F155). The later does not seem to be the case, although the scalar octaves appear to be more reliable than dividing by two to get what we might call binary octaves. These are commonly used and I used them successfully for years.

I am getting enough questions about this that I will post a note on my website sometime soon. Those who subscribe to my Google group will get it automatically <http://groups-beta.google.com/group/ElectronicMedicine>;.