Since starting up Dr. Jeff Sutherland's Electronic Medicine web site at http://jeffsutherland.com/complementary/, I've received a lot of interesting email with questions, comments, and suggestions. Since others are often interested you can post future comments here if you like. Then everyone has a chance to answer, comment, or query.

Edited by author 10-26-2003 04:42 PM
I receive questions by email and phone constantly. This is a good place to put a note on answers which I do not have time to post on my website. Two in the last hour are:

1. Have I bought an FSCAN and do I like it?

I bought one of the first FSCANs four or five years ago and found it extremently useful. The FSCAN2 is even better and gives much more accurate scans for microorganisms using the 15 volt port. Dale Fawcett, the leading U.S. distributor, can give you a lot more information than I have time for. Give him a call at (360) 598-6585.

2. What about Bi-Polar disease?

Bi-Polar disease is usually associated with the Borna virus. There is no conventional treatment for the virus. In infected people, flare ups appear to be associated with proliferation of the virus. Eliminating the virus in some cases has stopped an episode of the disease.

Edited by author 10-26-2003 05:34 PM
Sometimes I feel like Cecil Adams, allegedly the World's Smartest Human Being, with his famous syndicated column The Straight Dope http://www.straightdope.com/. My teenage son used his book as his bible (for better or worse, mostly worse).

Anyway, here's the question of the hour. What do you think about chemtrails?

I used to think chemtrail people were conspiracy theorists without any real data to support their concerns. However, I have now seen enough photos to know that something very strange is going on. I was a U.S. Air Force fighter pilot for 11 years so I know what contrails are supposed to look like. http://www.rense.com/politics6/chemdatapage.html

Also, a lot of people have given me enough information to pick up a consistent set of odd frequencies in people who say they are not feeling well after exposure to them.

I have no more data than that. If you are concerned, you should contact your congressman. I've heard that at least one member of congress tried to get them stopped, unsuccessfully.

The lunar eclipse photo posted tonight demonstrates why the latest digital photo technology is good for using the Cameron Aurameter to detect frequencies of micro-organisms. Previously, Polaroid photos were required to get maximum information content using for broadcasting with the Advanced BioPhoton Analyser. Now high quality digital photos (greater than 5 megapixels) are my technology of choice.

Edited by author 11-17-2003 08:24 PM
Hartford flu frequencies were updated tonight to include bacterial strains causing a runny nose, another parasite, and another strain of a previously identified virus.
265153 211120 211150 211170 211210
466543 353645 265441 144381
377676

I have just joined the Rife Group and The Electronic Medicine Group. I own an electromagnetic therapy machine (Model B) manufactured by JW Labs in San Diego California. At this time I am interested in combatting any flu virus that may rear it's ugly head, however, the frequency numbers given on the Hartford Flu are higher than my machine is capable of achieving (10,000 hz). Can these frequency numbers be translated into hertzes compatible with my model B from JWright Labs in San Diego? Also, where is the placement of the electropads and for what duration? Thank you.

Edited by author 11-18-2003 04:01 AM
Butch,
You are not the first person that has asked me for lower frequencies. How do you know you have the Hartford flu?

Here is an F100 program with a set of octaves that are below 10000. You would put the pads as close to where you have symptoms as possible. For the Hartford flu it would be head and chest. Treat for 15 minutes and symptoms should lessen. If not, you probably don't have this flu.

label start
dwell 20
duty 50
pulse 64 75
converge 5 1
6763.02
162.00
167.00
246.00
465.00
563.00
1134.00
1556.00
1559.00
2286.00
3735.00
4335.00
5235.00
5513.00
5613.00
5654.00
5763.00
6157.00
7035.00
7878.00
8015.00
9523.00
9563.00
5383.50
4043.25
4194.63
4195.75
5637.50
5646.25
5647.50
5650.00
5693.75
5695.00
2255.95
2271.05
2414.55
2414.77
3298.75
3299.22
3299.53
3300.16
3522.53
3986.25
3988.75
3989.22
3990.31
3993.28
3993.59
3994.00
4150.83
4147.52
4152.92
4164.95
5525.70
5538.84
5541.48
5675.28
5900.42
5900.59
5901.19
6035.50
6036.83
6040.27
6041.66
6757.16
6977.44
7000.63
7002.03
7002.19
7002.50
7002.66
7002.81
7002.97
7003.13
7008.59
7012.03
7012.34
7014.53
7014.69
7289.73
7481.05
7609.84
7610.00
7610.31
7615.00
7615.16
7615.31
7615.47
7615.63
7615.78
7622.97
goto start

I made some minor edits to the Hartford flu program to clean up lingering symptoms. The previous message and web page have been updated.

Bacteria infect sinuses and cause lingering running nose in Hartford flu. Add 4341.97 to the frequency list below.

Edited by author 11-19-2003 03:55 PM
I just posted a new frequency for the Rife "cancer germ."

When testing for a recent Rife organism infection in a volunteer testing positive for prostate cancer, I found another form of the bacillus with frequency 565565. Every other person I have tested that previously had an infection that was eliminated, still had this form of the organism present. Five minutes using an FSCAN with a wobble of 12 for three days in a row should take care of it. For plasma tube users, the octave 2209.24 should work just as well scanning 4hz above and below the frequency for the same amount of time.

A colleague in California tried the Hartford flu frequency list below which helped. However, he found 5411.84 and 5787.14 still remaining. These frequencies test strongly positive in two east coast people who have been relieved of all symptoms from the original frequency list but still have these additional organisms present. These are adenovirus frequencies and they need to be added to the Hartford frequency sequence.

A couple of people have asked for the Rife organism frequency sequence for EMEM devices. Here are octaves that work:

1675.00
2007.00
2128.00
2663.00
1319.56
1329.69
1255.00
1076.25
1002.50
2655.00
1347.13
1671.81
2209.24

Edited by author 11-30-2003 03:27 PM
Several frequencies have been added to the Hartford flu sequence: 5256.96 5254.14 5423.87 5423.31 1874.50 2421.89

On 30 Nov 2003, a woman in southern California with flu symptoms tested positive for the Hartford flu sequence plus several other frequencies noted above. There are apparently children dying of what may be this flu in Colorado. Anyone with flu symptoms should take Oscillicoccinum 200C immediately. Your flu shot will not help with the Hartford flu which is now appearing all over the country. Oscillicoccinum is available at any healthfood store and many pharmacies and supermarkets. For aches and pains, Symphytum 30C is effective. They should be taken separately at different times and not together. A single pellet mixed in water and sipped throughout the day while symptoms remain is enough. This alone should prevent serious illness.

Greetings,
 I have a BioTec 2000 will you please post the Flu frequencies for the BioTec.

Many Thanks!!

The BioTec 2000 transmits frequencies up to 10000hz. The frequency list for the Flu frequencies for such devices is posted below in a previous message.

An updated frequency set has been posted for the current flu epidemic. See http://jeffsutherland.com/complementary/ or contact jeff.sutherland@computer.org. These frequencies are for researchers to experiment with at their own risk.

I have purchase cameron Aurameter. Can you explain how do you find frequency for a particular disease or illness on the patient. Thank you.

Dr. Yus,

Using the Cameron Aurameter is described on my web page. See:
FSCAN FAQ: Determining precise frequencies for use with FSCAN or RIFE devices 28.11.03 (28 Nov 2003)

Hartford flu frequencies have just been updated at:
http://jeffsutherland.com/complementary/

Looking for current flu frequencies for Rife machine, Beam Ray.

Frequencies for the Beam Ray are posted on my web page. The first column is for machines that can transmit above 10,000hz. The second column is for those that transmit below 10,000hz. The second column can be used for the Beam Ray (which I believe will go up to 20,000hz).

JEFF, YOUR FREQUENCIES PROTOCOL FOR BI-POLAR & BORNA VIRUS

PLEASE.

THANKS, M R W

I regret that I cannot answer isolated requests for frequencies because:

1. People use them inappropriately with no way to test whether a person actually needs them, or whether they will be effective.

2. A release form needs to signed indicating that a person using the frequencies is undertaking a research project at their own risk.

3. There are so many requests that I have time to work only with people where I have an established relationship.

The flu frequencies are an exception because most people in the country will be exposed and thousands will die needlessly. It is a public service that involves the work of many people in addition to myself.

Dear Dr. Southerland,

re: Your reasons why you cannot answer isolated requests for frequencies.

re: reason #1. It was my understanding that forums like this were created for people to share knowledge and help each other to not use these methods inappropriately.

As for not being able to test and see if I will actually need the frequencies for this influenza outbreak and whether they will be
effectice, I can assure you that after very nearly dying, 29 days in the hospital in 1968 with the Hong Kong Flu AND double Lobar pneumonia, very nearly dying again in the hospital with the flu and pneumonia in both 1996 and 1997 (after being vaccinated both years), I WILL KNOW IF I HAVE THE FLU and won't need any test to confirm it. As for being effective, I have studied and researched many fields of alternative medicine,
including the work of Royal Rife and the others in his field for years and not only know it will be effective, it will save my life if I get this flu. My only crime is that being disabled with Lupus and a number of other autoimmune diseases I'm financially unable to purchase any Rife devices or others that would make the fight to heal myself and stay alive without ever seeing a traditional doctor again a little easier. Sadly the best I could do was purchase two Zappers and a used BK 3011 B Function Generator that I can't use until someone who understands electronics will be willing to spend maybe five minutes of their time to answer 3 or 4 questions for me. While I'm actually very knowlegable about chemistry, the body and healing with alternative medicine, I'm mentally challenged electonically. But I keep trying anyway.

re: reason #2

I absolutely understand the need for a signed release form. As I said I've studied alternative medicine for years and know all about the possible dangers from our #*&! government for giving out advice in these fields.

re: reason # 3

I also understand the limit on your time and only working with the people you have established relationships with. I deeply reqret not getting to know you when I joined the Rife Forum last year after getting my function generator but just after joining my cat peed on my computer taking out the motherboard, power supply and two harddrives. I only recently finished building it back.

If you know of anyone who might be able to help me with a few general questions about frequency generators (nothing to do with healing) and the frequency list at Qucik Topic it will mean more to me than you can imagine. I would be willing to sign or do anything they asked.

I would also like to thank you for all your website and wonderful information at Quick Topic.

Sincerely
Debbie Hearn

On 11 Dec 2003 13:16:52 -0000 QT - Dr.Jeff Sutherland
<qtopic+24-RViC8ekMUsf@quicktopic.com> writes:
>
< replied-to message removed by QT >

A number of new frequencies have been added to the Hartford flu list. I agree that right now it is easy to diagnose the flu. Everyone in my office has it. Fortunately, most of them are not very sick. So I am reinfected every day multiple times a day and can detect a few new frequencies. A number of frequencies have come in from California that were still detected after the previous flu sequence was run.

For those on limited means or without Rife devices, the combination of Oscillicoccinum 200C, Transfer Factor Plus, and Vitamin C is enough to prevent any significant flu symptoms or make the illness very mild in most cases. CDC officials were on TV this morning recommending rest, stay at home, and use over the counter meds for symptomatic control if you are infected.

The BK 3011 B Function Generator has been used to build the experimental Doug device, see parts description at:
http://healthalternative.freeyellow.com/doug_device.txt
Since I haven't worked with this device, I'm not sure how it would work as a stand alone device. A question posted to rife@yahoogroups.com would reach knowledgeable people who might help out.

Deborah,

     I recommend you join the Rife-List Yahoo! E-group at http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rife-list/ to have all your questions answered and/or you can ask me. I also recommend you go to this site regarding a Poor Man's Rife light instrument:
 http://www.holman.net/rife/Poor_Man_s_Rife...hv_plasma_rife.html

    You might be able to use either your PC or your BK 3011 B Function Generator for the signal input. You might even know someone who can put a Poor Man's Rife instrument for you.

Tom

About 50% of the SARS deaths in China can be attributed to air pollution. See new paper at: http://jeffsutherland.com/complementary

Hi, Dr. Sutherland!
     With the use of a Syncrometer, Dr. Clark is able to detect prion protein bits escaping from the flu virus. Hence, she advises people to keep a bottle copy of prion protein on the plate when they plate-zap. Have you seen any evidence of prions emerging from the Hartford flu?
      Thanks!!
        Sally

Edited by author 12-17-2003 10:13 AM
We have noticed that the flu frequencies will not be eliminated from the body without running 6546.76 which appears to be a protein. I would need a prion protein sample to test to determine if this is it.

A new journal abstract has just been posted on the effect of electromagnetic fields on cancer cells at http://jeffsutherland.com/complementary/

Yesterday I posted nanobacteria frequencies at http://jeffsutherland.com/complementary. This is a significant finding which you should all be aware of.

I ran the nanobacteria sanguineum frequencies posted by Dr. Sutherland on a 13 year old boy who had missed 2.5 months of school in the last 3 months. Mitchel had very little energy and slept until 2 pm every day. His parents were worried about his survival. After 3 hours on a bioresonance machine using the Nanobacteria frequencies, Mitchel is now a normal happy child. Thanks, Jeff.

Edited by author 03-13-2004 07:54 AM
Dennis certainly had the profound effect I mentioned when using the nanobacteria frequencies. I have just updated my web site with two additional nanobacteria frequencies - 554365 563124 - and I'm running them on a weekly basis until I my system tests completely clear of the pathogen. The time required may be longer than the 45 minutes in the F100 program below.

repeat 45
dwell 60
duty 50
pulse 64 74
converge 33 1
763545 665386 634671 563124 554365 296214 264224 187613 141346 134443
end repeat

On plasma devices that need lower frequencies I use the following octaves:

repeat 45
dwell 60
duty 50
pulse 64 74
converge 8 1
11930.39
10396.66
9916.73
8798.81
8661.95
4628.34
4128.50
2931.45
2208.53
2100.67
end repeat

On an FSCAN, the first number in the converge statement (8 in the plasma program) is the wobble.

Hello All,
I am searching for:
1. The Rife frequencies that kill the prions associated with Mad Cow Desease in humans.
2. The Rife frequencies that kill the prions associated with the wasting desease in the deer and elk populations.
Thank you for your kind asistance.
All the best,
Richard W. "Skip" Hughes III

I've moved a previous item on prion frequencies to the top of my web page at http://jeffsutherland.com/complementary.

To identify specific frequencies, I need a microscopic photo of the prion in question. It should be in digital form with as high a resolution as possible. Ideally, anyone requesting such frequencies must also have the capability of testing them to see how well they work.

On some occassions, people have provided slides of biopsies or blood samples. These will work also. This takes time and effort and can only be done on a consulting basis.

I've posted frequencies for a new flu that I have now seen on both east and west coasts of the U.S. at:
http://jeffsutherland.com/complementary

Here is the F100 program for plasma devices for the current flu epidemic:

label start
dwell 10
duty 50
pulse 64 75
converge 5 .1
8911.25
9113.5
9141.5
9393.13
6654.69
7255
7284.06
8041.5
10334.06
10346.56
10976.38
7414.28
7631.09
7632.66
7667.38
7676.94
8045.81
8082.59
8305.19
5548.59
5549.22
5554.69
5554.84
5558.75
5560.78
5562.5
7118.2
5045.03
6752.01
goto start

Several people have asked for the nanobacteria frequencies to be translated into Rife frequencies. Beam ray and Stenulson devices will transmit over 10000hz so the following program should be used. If you can't get over 10000hz, divide the higher frequencies by 2.

repeat 8 #minimum for asymptomatic people
dwell 60
duty 50
converge 0 0
13543.18
13543.89
13544.26
13544.49
13546.48
13546.88
13544.59
13545.21
13546.95
11930.39
10396.66
converge 4 1
9916.73
8798.81
8661.95
4628.34
4128.50
2931.45
2208.53
2100.67
end repeat

I have a few questions as I am new to this group. I don't have a Stenulson device but do have an AZ58, EMEM-5 modified and two high freq generators (TG1010a) up to 10MHz used in combination on the body as per Aubrey Scoon's recommendation. I need some clarification on Dr. Sutherland's freq recommendations. What is dwell 60 mean. What is converge mean? and what is the actually pulse freq when you say pulse 64. I have also found some freq for Borrelia that I am using with sucess.
Borrelia Anderoni: 789424 and 378440Hz
B. anserine; 789653
B. Dttonii: 790000, 789759
B. Burgdorferi: 925115
B. Parkeri: 789653

Babesia Divergens 504578
Babesia Variant WA1: 462557

Also what is the difference between the ABPA A2 and the ABPA A1. Is the A2 better than the A1?
Thanks
Dr. Rick B

Edited by author 06-20-2004 10:56 AM
The ABPA A2 has a new motherboard and software that gives about 60% better transmission. I have two A1s that I upgraded to A2s and I recommend others do the same. Call Dale Fawcett at (360) 598-6585 for details.

I use the F100 programming language to describe my frequencies as it gives a complete and accurate description of what is needed. Dwell, duty, pulse, and converge all affect treatment time and effectiveness.

The language is documented on the F100 site at:
http://atelierrobin.tripod.com/guide.html

Some simple examples from the documentation:

How do I run 727 HZ:

727

How do I run 727, 800 , 880 and 1500 HZ each for 120 seconds:

dwell 120
727
800
880
1500

How do I run 900 HZ for 60 seconds and 1000 HZ for 5 minutes:

dwell 60
900
dwell 300
1000

How do I sweep from 120 to 1000 HZ in 1 HZ steps that run half a second each?

dwell 0.5
sweep 120 1000 1

How do I run 10000 HZ for 30 seconds, pulsed at 4 HZ:

dwell 30
pulse 4 50
10000

How do I run 770 HZ for 3.5 minutes with a 80% duty cycle:

dwell 210
duty 80
770

For details, see the documentation, or give Dale Fawcett a call.

Hi Jeff,

Do you have a frequency(s) for WA1 pathogen(piroplasm)found in lyme disease...first discovered in washington? I would appreciate any information you can share...

Thanks,
Byron

I haven't had a WA1 case. If you can get me a good microscopic image of the pathogen, I'll identify and post the frequency.

SV40 frequencies have just been updated. I am seeing many SV40 induced tumors. Killing tumor cells or any pathogens in the vicinity causes reactivation of the SV40 virus and reinfection. Unless this is eliminated, new tumor cells will proliferate.

For those of you following my Electronic Medicine site, I have just posted an important note on why people often get mixed results from frequency devices.

Hello: I have PKD (Polycystic Kidney Disease) and am close to dialysis with a creatinine of 6.6 - I don't want dialysis as you can well imagine. I have been using Rife technology since Nov. '03 but my labs have not responded. I do feel great however; the nephrologist says in my case, "It is symptom driven (no dialysis until the symptoms get too unpleasant" thus I feel I have time to try to turn the table on that as my future. I have done the renal insufficiency frequencies on the CALF, also some other suggested frequencies for SV40 contamination. Any further suggestions? Do you have experience in the QRS machine? Would it be applicable for me? Meanwhile I am fasting with juices, watermelon to be exact, day 5 and feeling great. Thanks very much in advance, age 53 female caucasian
Madie

I have read your site. Impressive, to say the least. Bottom line - would you consider me as a 'volunteer' at the Rife Conference? FScan me, zap me, test me any way you desire - I need some hope, other than the AMA offered dialysis transplant route. Thanks in advance, no matter the reply.

Hello Madie,
Have you done frequencies for parasites? If not and you have a pad device put the pads on front and back over your kidneys. Be careful not to overdo it for if you have a dye off you want it at a level your kidneys can handle. Go slow and see how you tolerate it. Drink a lot of water. Since parasites are such a large problem that doctors ignore, these cysts may be parasitic in cause. I would focus on a parasite cleanse systemically. My machine also has frequencies for kidney papilloma that I would throw in. I know some people, an MD and his associate who are doing some stem cell work here in the USA.(non embryonic cells I think but from Lamb fetus) They claim to be having some success with regenerating organs. The protocol comes from New Zealand where the genetic line of sheep is very pure without disease, where they have been working on this for a while. They are working under a research entitlement from the FDA. Part of their protocol is the usasge of a Multiple Wave Oscillator which they say will kill microbes and assist cells to function normally. If you want more information on this you can contact me privately. I would also find an advanced practioner of homotoxicology, a branch of homoepathy, to see if they can assist. jdurfeeathome@aol.com - Best, Barbara

Madie,
If you send an email to jeff.sutherland@computer.org I will respond with two documents which describe how I work with volunteers.

Hi Madie,
Have you also considered the possibility of heavy metal toxification? If you have not already done so, I suggest you read what Garry Gordon is NOW saying on this subject. Kidney dysfunction is often the result of heavy metal (like lead) toxification. All of us are said to have 1,000 times more lead stored in our bones --- compared to people who lived a few hundred years ago. This is not revealed with a blood test. The new form of chelation called EDTA IV Push only takes 1-5 minutes per session and has produced quick and remarkable improvements in some people. After reading recently what Garry has to say on his web site I have concluded that this new form of IV chelation, plus an ongoing program of oral chelation, could help some people avoid kidney dialysis. Go to www.gordonresearch.com
Best wishes!
Carlos
=================
>
< replied-to message removed by QT >

Edited by author 08-29-2004 12:09 PM
Updated Nanobacteria frequencies for plasma devices are listed below. Run time needs to be 45 minutes for a light infection and may be many hours for serious infection.

label start
dwell 60
duty 50
pulse 64 75
converge 4 0.1
6773.48
1491.30
1299.58
9916.73
8798.81
8661.95
4628.34
4128.50
2931.45
2208.53
2100.67
1995.69
1902
317
goto start

Does anyone have a Rife device, Beam Ray in the Houston, Texas area, or the Ontario, Canada region that a person can come and sit under? Thanks

Dear Madie,
On reading your post where you mentioned that you are drinking fruit juice, esp. watermelon juice, I immediately recalled having noted an immune boosting diet somewhere here on the net. In this diet, the writer mentioned a couple of fruits to be avoided, and I am almost certain that watermelon was one of these. I shall continue my search, but if anyone else spots it in the meantime, please share the link/article with us.
Love and light,
Annie / South Africa.

Hello Jeff,

I’m wondering about your thoughts and experiences relating to differences in effectiveness using a biphasic square wave versus a totally positive dc offset square wave. Hulda Clark, as you know, strongly recommends the positive dc offset square wave even stating that any negative going portion of the square wave will help the critters we are trying to eliminate. On the other hand some say that a dc current is harmful and I have in fact seen small skin blisters develop using a dc offset square wave.

Thanks,
Dave

I think Hulda Clark is right about using a positive offset square wave. However, current can be harmful to cells. For this reason I used direct contact only for carefully specified time periods where the Aurameter indicates benefit outweighs negative side effects and use the ABPA for most frequency application, where there is no direct application of current. In that case biphasic square waves provide greater swing in amplitude which appears to improve the effect.

However, any frequency application, even with the ABPA can have negative effect as well as positive. They need to be applied carefully, with exact frequencies, for the minimum amount of time to get the desired result.

Hello Jeff, I truly enjoyed your lecture on Friday and I must
> say that I thank you for your contribution to all of us. I had
> asked a question about Hep C and you asked that I contact you. I
> have a lady who is suffering with terrible itching and abdominal
> problems and I know I can help her with your input.Please give
> me any suggestions and specific freguencies. I would be most
> appreciative for any comments.
> Thank you,
> Mari
>

Dr. Sutherland,
I found the frequencies 959.60 and 703.45 For Mycobacterium Avian Complex from Yahoo Groups Rife. I am using and FSCAN2 is there any suggested time for each frequency.Or is it the standard 180 seconds.
Thanks
Henry

Henry,
Answering this question requires a comprehensive testing procedure:
1. Microscopic photo of pathogen - derive frequencies
   Your frequencies may be octaves of the real frequency
   Or not, or may or may not be useful octaves.
2. High resolution photo of person - do they have the same frequencies, a different strain, or a different organism
3. Scanning the person with an FSCAN or transmitting frequencies and determining whether it is a hit.
4. Transmitting frequencies and seeing an immediate effect on symptomology.

Dengue is common in my country. Do you have frequencies for this virus? According to CDC it is caused by one of four closely related virus serotypes (DEN-1,DEN-2,DEN-3 and DEN-4), of the genus flavivirus. Thank you...

Image of infected blood cells from CDC....

The frequencies for the Dengue virus in the photo appear to be:
363546 265634 154556 65557

Confirming that this is correct and whether it is one of many strains would have to be tested against people who have the virus.

I am seeking a comprehensive approach for the treatment genital warts. At this point the specific strain is unknown but may be available after the results of the biopsy is complete.

Hi Dave - Has the patient been on a course of Acromycin or similar antibiotic recently by any chance? As a very RARE contraindication can sometimes cause identical looking warts, which, once the antibiotic is stopped, the warts automatically disappear soon after.

More than 90% of the time, in my experience, warts are caused by a virus and when the virus is eliminated, the warts disappear. There are hundreds of viral strains so they must be identified in each instance.

For every virus there are four primary forms which can be seen under a microscope. In addition, there are typically six supporting frequencies (likely proteins) that need to be eliminated.

You need to be able to identify precise frequencies.

Edited by author 11-04-2004 10:36 PM
Dr. Sutherland,
If the exact strain can be identified (16, 11..etc.) will that be enough information to to identify the correct frequencies?


Annie- The warts actually appeared over a month after doxycycline was used following oral surgery (10 days). Immediately after the antibiotic cycle was over a 3 week episode of itching and burning began on the scrotum followed by a red ring around the tip of the penis and finally what appears to be a colony of tiny warts under the head of the penis. Urine tests also indicate microscopic blood present. All these symptoms may be unrelated.

Edited by author 11-05-2004 12:39 AM
Voila Dave! I rest my case. All the very best finding a) anyone who will entertain the suggestion of a 'possible' association, and even more difficult, b) ANYONE who will take ANY form of responsibility, c) ANYONE who will be willing to do anything to prevent further incidences! The case I'm aware of was reported in 1976 - almost 30 years ago!
The following gives an idea of how 'cowardly' the manufacturers 'cover' themselves. Why not simply & honestly warn against a possible outbreak of GENITAL WARTS?

"Doxycycline is in a class of medications called tetracycline antibiotics."
See here for the VERY LONG list included in this group:
http://www.reviewscience.com/AB-Tetr.htm

"What side effects can this medication cause?
Although side effects from doxycycline are not common, they can occur. Tell your doctor if any of these symptoms are severe or do not go away:
upset stomach; diarrhea; itching of the rectum or vagina
sore mouth.
If you experience the following symptom, call your doctor immediately: skin rash"

Also, who on earth would know the following beforehand?
"What special precautions should I follow?
Before taking doxycycline" .... see here:
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginf...master/a682063.html

Who ends up footing the bill for all the medical treatment, blood tests and possible further medication required to RECTIFY the damage done - let alone the time this takes, and the trauma and damage caused through totally unwarranted accusations from partners or parents - this is after all considered a sexually transmitted disease!
Antibiotics from this group are also used as a prevention against MALARIA (ie. travellers) - the mind boggles at the thought of the vast number of unnecessary false accusations this ONE group ALONE has and shall continue to, result in. They are also used to treat ACNE - how many innocent teens are either left feeling shameful and/or suffering their fate in silence, through fear of mentioning their 'outbreak' to anyone?
 
These are the same people who wish to restrict the use of totally harmless VITAMINS & MINERALS, and discourage ALTERNATIVE HEALTH CARE!!!
If only more people would open their eyes and then speak up.

Dear Dr. Sutherland:

Have you identified and/or itemized any frequency sets regarding the dinoflagellates (e.g. Pfiesteria, ciguatera, cylindromspermopsis, and chattonella)? If not, are you aware of anyone else out there who has? Thanking you for your assistance and response.

Mark

I have been working with a lot of dinoflagellates (algae) lately and their frequencies vary. Most of them are between 160000 and 180000. They have a large bandwidth, i.e. 200-400hz and take many hours to eliminate. This makes the ABPA the device of choice for these organisms.

They also release toxic proteins that should be zapped along with the primary organism. Let's take an example. Look at the photo of the cyst of Spiniferites:
http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/palynol...inoflagellates.html

This organism appears to have a frequency of 164666 with a bandwidth of 340hz. It will release a toxic protein when killed. This frequency is 14543 with a bandwidth of 14 hz. If you are infected with this it may take 12 hours or more to eliminate it.

The simplest program might be:

repeat 72
dwell 1
duty 50
pulse 64 75
sweep 164326 165006 1
dwell 60
converge 12 1
10676
end repeat

Using carrier waves and scalar octaves can cut the treatment time by at least 60%.

This should be enough information for experimentation, particularly if you have an FSCAN. For individuals that want to definitively eliminate a serious problem, get some consulting assistance.

Jeff,

I was unable to attend your Rife Conference seminar(s). Will you be offering another such seminar in the near future? I'm sure there are many of us wanting to hang out with you, network and learn.

Mark

There are two seminars that I have asked Dale Fawcett to help set up, one in Boston and another in Lake Tahoe, in the winter and spring of next year. You can talk to Dale about current status by giving him a call at (360)598-6585.

Hello! I have just now subscribed here and need help.

My father has advanced colon cancer, with mets to his liver, lungs, and spleen. His liver is starting to show alot of abnormal funcions, high alkaline phosphatase, high total bilirubin, high SGOT(AST).

I am going to start using a Rife/Bare, along with a parasite cleanse. I will also do the flax oil and cottage cheese treatment. He is currently also taking Ambrotrose, catalyst, ambrotrose AO, manna cleanse, plus, phyte aloe and empact.

Could you please tell me what I can use for his liver functions? He is getting jaundiced and we need to do something really fast!!

Thank you so much for your help and God Bless!!

Jackie

I just read an interesting theory on the causes of obesity: Infectobesity: Obesity of Infectious Origin, by Nikhil V. Dhurandhar

Seems like the culprits are:
1-AD-36
2-AD-37
3-SMAM-1 Avian Adenovirus
4- Chlamydia Pneumonia
5- Canine Distemper Virus CDV
6- Rous Associated Virus RAV-7

Do you have specific frequencies for any of these? It would should be an interesting experiment with obesity as rampant as it is today.

Thank you,
Sandi

Electronic Medicine QT subscribers will be interested in an article in today's New York Times, Finding Healing Music in the Heart:

 http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/09/nyregion/09beat.html?oref=login

Dr. Sutherland:

How would you convert the flu frequencies to an Fscan2?

thanks,
Sandi

Please note that I have added a second viral strain to the flu frequencies.

Use the orginal frequencies in the FSCAN as noted in the comments for the F100 program. Us a wobble of 65 for the virus for frequencies above 10000hz and a wobble of 5 for lower frequencies. For the parasite use a wobble of 20.

For candida, it is best to DIRP from 386000 to 387000 with a delta of 10 and treat peaks.

The flu epidemic continues to unfold. This flu causes a runny nose, sneezing, gastrointestinal distress, and some aches and pains. For aches and pains, Gelsemium 30C is effective.

You may have to run this frequency set a couple of times the first day and again on subsequent days if symptoms remain.

For those with devices that only transmit frequencies under 10000hz:

repeat 4.00
dwell 120.00
program b
vbackfreq a 20.09 0.00 50.00
duty 50.00
converge 3.00 0.01
# Comment - residual organisms
# 41565.00 3156.00 1374.00
 103.03 157.13 68.41
# Comment - next line are original parasite frequencies
# 477345.00 365647.00 265677.00 166745.00
 58.91 45.12 32.79 20.58
# 466554.00 366646.00 262662.00 146464.00 74443.00 44542.00 13414.00 6333.00
 57.58 45.25 32.42 18.08 184.53 110.41 33.25 315.30
# Comment - parasite is infected with wide spectrum candida
duty 10.00
converge 20.00 0.10
# 386654.00
 47.72
duty 50.00
converge 2.10 0.10
# Comment - next line is original virus frequencies
# 366776.00 273556.00 166476.00 66454.00 7557.00 4667.00 2356.00 1765.00 266.00 30.00
 45.26 33.76 20.54 164.72 376.24 232.36 117.30 87.87 266.00 30.00
# 377656.00 246765.00 177577.00 66724.00 7777.00 4676.00 2677.00 1636.00 777.00 277.00
 46.61 30.45 21.91 165.39 387.19 232.80 133.28 81.45 38.68 277.00
# 354346.00 246663.00 166447.00 66774.00 7646.00 4746.00 2634.00 1866.00 766.00 277.00
 43.73 30.44 20.54 165.52 380.67 236.29 131.14 92.90 38.14 277.00
# 366466.00 264448.00 144666.00 76665.00 7655.00 4646.00 2644.00 1555.00 763.00 266.00
 45.23 32.64 17.85 190.03 381.12 231.31 131.64 77.42 37.99 266.00
# 376656.00 264464.00 144434.00 66243.00 7433.00 4424.00 2444.00 1333.00 762.00 234.00 32.00
 46.48 32.64 17.82 164.20 370.07 220.26 121.68 66.37 37.94 234.00 32.00
end repeat

Edited by author 11-15-2004 09:04 PM
Hello Jeff,

A couple of questions about using photos with the ABPA.

1) Does the Polaroid 600 work as well (or nearly as well) as a 5 megapixel digital camera? I hadn't realized how inexpensive the Polaroid is.

2) When using a digital camera do you print off the person's picture on your computer's printer? If so, then it would seem that the quality of the printer is very important.

thanks,
Dave

Edited by author 11-18-2004 12:32 AM
A good 5 megapixel camera like the Sony DSC-V1 will generate a high resolution image that can be printed on regular paper and put in the photo well on the ABPA. The picture should be taken using a tripod and printed on a 1200dpi printer. This will increase the power output of the ABPA about 1000% compared to a Polaroid photo not taken with a tripod for frequency work.

Make sure you use the cable that came with the ABPA to connect to a frequency generator and run under the input well. The correct impedance match of this cable will increase power output another 500%.

These are multiplicative so you get 50 times the output, considerably more than the older way of doing this. This has dramatic implications for transmission times and pathogen kill rates.

Jeff, thanks for the info. One further question came to mind. Does color work better than black and white?

TIA

The ABPA output seems to totally depend on information content of the photo. A color photo will have more information than a black and white of equal resolution. However, I suspect the difference would not be greater than other factors like using a tripod or the right hardware setup. This would have to be tested.

More questions (my mind keeps churning!).

Is there a different effect from the ABPA when using a simple signal generator input to the ABPA via the ABPA cable
vs
using a signal generator to drive a plasma tube and having the input of the ABPA in the proximity of the plasma tube?

My reasoning is that the signal generator output is a basic EM field while the plasma tube output seems to have more (or at least different) components (longitudinal waves, scalar waves, whatever).

Any experience or thoughts on this?

Edited by author 11-21-2004 09:41 PM
A plasma tube in the vicinity of the ABPA definitely has an effect. It is similar but not exactly the same as running a wire from a frequency generator under the device.

The ABPA is picking up the EM field and transmitting it. The field has different characteristics.

The only useful difference I have discovered so far is that one of my plasma devices, a Bioeneray XL3 from Tom Harrelson, is more effective at eliminating persistent viruses like Coxsackie that anything else, i.e. with the ABPA on and the Bioeneray near the ABPA, the remote transmission of the plasma EM field is very effective.

The Bioeneray has different field characteristics than my Stenulson EM6C+ device which I use most often. The EM6C+ has a stronger magnetic field but little electrical field. The Bioeneray XL3 has a very strong electrical field that pegs a Trifield meter 3 feet from the tube. This is the distant that I have the ABPA from the tube.

I just ordered a ABPA. I have been asking very similair questions. I was told to lay my rife cables in the input well. I wonder why it can't be plugged into the ABPA directly, even through some sort of capacitive coupling. Do you own an ABPA? A Rife Machine? What type? What other devices do you own?
Daniel
danlcaldwell@yahoo.com

QT - Dave <qtopic+24-RViC8ekMUsf@quicktopic.com> wrote:
< replied-to message removed by QT >

I find this very interesting. Alan Back, inventor of the ABPA, states to use only Poloroid 600 film because of the purity of the silver halide crystals. Also, in my SE-5 directions it states to do the same and that if you suject the photo to certain energies, they will erase the IDF imprint and the photo will no longer be of use. I wanted to know if I can use my Poloroid Spectra photos in these machines. I find this stange because the 600 photos capture the energy (soul-per Am Indians). How can a printer using ink do this?
Thanks,
Daniel

"QT - Dr.Jeff Sutherland" <qtopic+24-RViC8ekMUsf@quicktopic.com> wrote: --QT------------------------------------------------------------- Reply by email or visit
http://www.quicktopic.com/24/H/RViC8ekMUsf/m79
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A good 5 megapixel camera like the Sony DSC-V1 will generate a
high resolution image that can be printed on regular paper an
put in the photo well on the ABPA. It should be taken with a
tripod and printed on a 1200dpi printer. This will increase the
power output of the ABPA about 500% compared to a Polaroid photo
for frequency work.

Make sure you use the cable that came with the ABPA to connect
to a frequency generator and run under the input well. The
correct impedance match of this cable will increase power output
another 500%.

These are multiplicative so you get 25 times the output,
considerably more than the older way of doing this. This has
dramatic implications for transmission times and pathogen kill
rates.
_________________________________________________________________

Everything I post is based on my own testing. For some uses, a Polaroid photo may be best as the instrument was designed for this. My comments are directed at frequency transmission to eradicate pathogens.

Putting cables in the input well will transmit the signature of the metal to you. This is not good.

Alan Back has made up some cables for me that connect directly to the ABPA with a knob to adjust the impedance. When I determine the exact setting for maximum output he will create a cable to my specificatons that will be sold to anyone who wants one.

Incidently, if you buy an ABPA from Dale Fawcett, he pays for a month of my consulting to make sure you get maximum benefit. Dale's number is (360) 598-6585.

QT - Dr.Jeff Sutherland wrote:

>
>
>
< replied-to message removed by QT >

Jeff & friends,
Running only one tube on a 7C system which I've run for several years now, (a tripple Bubble E-gas tube) with the tube mounted vertically in the tube support stand, and running with the Power Output Level set in the top output (1220), with the Plasma Optimizationn control set properly for maximum plasma resonance, I have to back off to about ten feet from the tube before my Trifield Meter comes down off being 'pegged' to the maximum display of 100,000 volts per meter E-field density reading. Your 6C EM+ should be performing similarly, when using the same settings; the systems are very similar. If not, it may be time to replace components which may be degrading or failing.

These E-field level observations have been made many times while holding the Tri-field meter in my hand; when doing this, the body is surrounded / permeated by the resonant radiant plasma energy field, so in effect, the meter is displaying the E-field electrification level of the body which is holding the meter.

Another way to set up for doing comparitive measurements would be to mount the meter in a non-metallic support stand or fixture, away from both the body and any metallic structures which will either absorb or reflect the plasma tube's signal. Quantitative results observed using the meter in this way could be used to compare outputs between tubes, with only the Tri-field meter's frequency response limitations and inherant error margin tollerances coming into consideration.

A new generation of EM+ system has been in development for many months, with enhanced output power levels available on all aspects of the system- radiant plasma, contact plasma, contact pad output channel, pulsed light output channel, and the enhanced high frequency pulsed magnetic output channel. New pulsed magnetic accessories will also become available, with higher magnetic flux densities at extreme frequencies (from below 1 Hz to beyond 1 MHz without a noticible drop-off in magnetic field strength.) I'll be releasing information on the new system once it's been extensively tested.

Be Well!!

Bruce
http://www.stenulson.net/althealth

Hello fellow ABPA explorers,

I have a couple of theoretical questions regarding the photo used in the ABPA well. Here we go:

-- if a 5.1M digital picture is good, is a 6 or even 8 megapixel one better?

-- if one picture is good, would two or more pictures, perhaps different views of the subject, be even better, all stuffed in the well?

---does clothing in the picture obstruct the vital information?...perhaps showing as much skin as possible (sorry, I'm not trying to be silly...this is a real question) might get better results?

---Dr. Sutherland mentioned printing the picture on regular paper--do you print it as large as possible and then fold the picture up? You mentioned a 1200dpi printer...I guess I'm wondering if the idea is to print the picture in a size that will fit in the well or let the entire thing print and fold.

I guess the real thing that must be learned is how to be able to test for yourself what definitively is working well and what not so well: how to answer these question myself in a clear yes or no way based on some 'litmus test'. Maybe it can not be so clean cut. Maybe my questions above are just some ideas to try out, but I would love to hear other peoples opinions on them. The whole idea of the subtle, vital information transmission is new to me and I'm not sure how to approach it. It's very exciting!

Any comments or ideas welcomed,

Dave
(who is enjoying this forum)

Dave,
I too have been asking some similair questions. I just purchased an ABPA AM-3. I was told it was calibrated only to be used with Poloroid 600 film. I also saw two tapes that came with it that said the same thing. They did say if you were working with a large subject (i.e. a building or a field), you could put four pictures from four different angles in the well. I am goig to do some experimenting re: using a digital camera because I have one and a nice printer.

Daniel
danlcaldwell@harmonic-circle.com

The ABPA was designed to work with Polaroid 600 photos. Therefore I recommend you use them for most purposes.

For my research which specifically relates to targeting specific pathogens with very specific frequency sets, I have invested a lot of time in finding what kills them more effectively.

At my workshop at the Rife Conference in October, I went over the population based mathematical programs that show what happens to pathogens, or any organism, when they are hit with something that shortens their life cycle. The most important parameter in these equations relates directly to power transfer to the organism.

My comments relate to how to modify the hardware setup with the ABPA to achieve maximum power transfer for a specific frequency to a specific organism. The ABPA was not originally designed to do this, but can be tweaked very effectively.

For this specific purpose my recommendations are:

1. Use the wire that comes with the ABPA to connect to the frequency generator. Run this under the input well. This will increase power transfer by a factor of 5 over running other cables and about 25 over running cables that are not properly terminated.

2. The inventor of the ABPA has sent me test cables that plug directly into the ABPA from the frequency generator (I use F160s and the FSCAN2). The test cables have a dial type device so I can adjust the impedance match between the frequency generator and the ABPA. With the proper setting, I get five times better power transfer than the original ABPA cables. Alan Back, the inventor of th ABPA, is taking this information and building cables that will be available to everyone that will provide this effect. This means that you will get 25 times better power transfer than other properly terminated cables and about 125 times better effect than unterminated cables. I hope this makes it clear how important your hardware setup is.

3. The new cables will make it possible to kill pathogens that could not be eliminated previously and cut the time required at least in half.

4. The information content in the photos is linearly related to the power transfer. A TIF photo taken with a Sony DSC-V1 camera when printed out on a 1200dpi HP color inkjet printer at a size that fits into the photo well will give about 5 times the power transfer of a Poloraid 600 photo for my specific purposes as described above.

5. Multiple photos degrade the effect. I have not tested printing out a large photo, folding it, and putting it in the well. You may or may not get the right effect. I don't do this.

Carefully following these principles will allow people to get the same (often better) effect with the ABPA as they would get directly holding electrodes in most cases.

Edited by author 12-03-2004 11:11 PM
One further comment on the ABPA photos.

I originally used head and shoulder photos as the face contains the most information and you get maximum power transfer.

As I improved that hardware setup and got increasing power transfer, particularly with my research setup, I found that pathogens immediately started to flee from the photo area when the ABPA was turned on. This meant they moved to the lower body, particularly lower legs and feet. This caused problems.

I now, for a maximum power setup, only use a full body photo from head to toe. Do not leave out the feet.

For something like a sinus condition, you will eliminate it most quickly with a head shot. However, some of the pathogens will move to other parts of the body before they can be killed so a whole body shot should be used to followup.

These critters are not stupid, they have methods of intercommunication, and you have to be smarter than they are! A lot of people are taking random potshots hoping for the right frequency and this method will provide very erratic and sometimes no results, along with a lot of herxheimer reactions.

Edited by author 12-11-2004 04:14 PM
I have started a new Google Group to automatically post blog items as they appear. Some of you may want to subscribe.

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/ElectronicMedicine/

I am sorry for being ignorant. What is a blog item? Your site is terrific. There is no other place to get this info on the ABPA.
danlcaldwell@harmonic-circle.com

A "blog" item is an item posted on my web site:
http://frequencyresearch.org

The is formerly http://jeffsutherland.com/complementary/ which still works. However it was convenient to give it a unique URL.

I use Google's Blogger site to generate postings. Since Google is starting up groups that do not have offensive ads like Yahoo, it is convenient to have them automatically post to the Google group for individuals who want to receive them when they are posted.

Dr. Jeff Sutherland,

You commented awhile back about a cable Alan Back made for you that let you adjust the impedence from a frequency generator (I believe you use an FScan) to match the input to the ABPA. You said this was designed to find the best match and then Alan would make a cable.

1) Have you determined the correct match yet?
2) How will you go about determining the best match without
   the possibilty of over-driving the ABPA?
3) Do you have any info on this cable you can share?
4) I am trying to hook up my ABPA to my GB4000 and have
   some specs for the GB4000. Do you have some for the
   FScan I could compare them to?

danlcaldwell@yahoo.com

I have given Alan my feedback on the cables and we are waiting for him to produce them.

Meanwhile the most effective cable is the original cable that comes with the ABPA.

If the GB4000 puts out the same voltage as the FSCAN power port or F160 (up to 16 volts), it should work the same.

New frequencies for the current flu have been posted. See http://frequencyresearch.com/ for details.

repeat 10
dwell 360
duty 50
pulse 64 75
converge 27 1
#mites and mycoplasma
676786 666637 656675 656347 646654 575737
#bacteria
277668
264573 10776
222365 10644
255644 10544
#algae
166645 166626
#viruses
365546 255455 133465 66464
374667 266677 157464 66677 25636
354444 265776 166565 66446
#parasites
466457 366666 266556 156567
474656 356466 272667 156663
#those with EMEM devices can run these frequencies
converge 4 .1
14654 14446 9764 9376 8666 7556 7446 7277 6646 6245 5667 2444 2265
2247 1974 1755 1476 1144 1027 663 654 556 537 517 496 476 447 367 254 226 175 46 16 8
end repeat

Since Atelier Robbin has sold out of their f160 generator and the replacement is anticipated to cost $1000, I made the decision to purchase their f155. The thing I didnt study carefully in making this decision is that the f155 only can produce frequencies up to 1.5Mhz or so. So here is my question for Dr. Sutherland:

To approximate the effect of a frequency above 1.5Mhz, what is your recommendation?

Here are some of my guesses:

-to divide the desired frequency by increasing integers until we get a number within the range of our generator
(So for example, if I was trying to produce the 3467055 frequency---one of the nanabacteria program, I could try dividing by 2 to get 1733527.5. But this is still out of range, so I might try dividing by 3 to get a number which my machine could generate.) ...Or perhaps this is wrong, perhaps we need only odd or even numbers (my understanding of harmonics is definitely limited!)

-take the "scalar octave". Based on Dr. Sutherland's posts I've decided that this means to divide the frequency by the number e raised to the 3rd power. I have no idea where this idea comes from, but somehow I suspect this to be a good guess. (My google search on scalar octave returned Dr. Sutherland's references to it in his f160 programs and then the rest seem to be related to a computer program called "Octave"--->no luck.)

Dr Sutherland, any internet resources you may know of to help explain what you mean by scalar octave would be awesome.

I'm going to try and run the nanobacteria program using scalar octaves of Dr. Sutherland's frequencies. We'll see if they create any subjective results :)


dave

Edited by author 03-30-2005 07:26 AM
The F160's are a nice device. I have four of them I plan to upgrade to the F1000. The main reason is that I run four of them on the same computer and it takes a lot of computer resource. The F1000 will have a chip in it that will run the program and offload that function from the computer.

If anyone wants an F160, I will sell one for half the price of the F1000 when that is announced.

On the topic of scalar octaves, this is a difficult question to answer, as I developed and tested them after studying papers at the Global Scaling site <http://www.aw-verlag.ch/Global-Scaling_EN.htm>;.

My goal with scalar octaves was to cut frequency broadcast times with the ABPA by more than 50% and I suspected that any scalar octave would have the same effect as the primary frequency. The former has proved to be a reliable assumption, although I always use the primary frequency as a carrier wave (which you will not be able to do in many cases with the F155). The later does not seem to be the case, although the scalar octaves appear to be more reliable than dividing by two to get what we might call binary octaves. These are commonly used and I used them successfully for years.

I am getting enough questions about this that I will post a note on my website sometime soon. Those who subscribe to my Google group will get it automatically <http://groups-beta.google.com/group/ElectronicMedicine>;.

Thanks for the link, Dr. Sutherland: a fascinating web site, albeit, one way over my head. Why are all the cool books written in German?!

Thank goodness for people like you who translate bits of these ideas into usable concepts for the layperson.

---------------
The only effect I noticed from running the nanobacteria frequencies at the scalar octave (via the f155 and the ABPA) was a thickened tongue coat that evening. In chinese medicine this is interpreted as "dampness" or "phlegm", which could reflect some sort of waste accumulation or die off. The tongue coat has returned to normal this morning (I drank a good bit of ozonated water, thinking this might help clear things up)

Here is my modification of your program:

repeat 16
dwell 60
duty 50
pulse 64 75
43644.3 #mercury release
4202.30 #DNA database
converge 12 1
127724
converge 1.5 .05 #dropped down for the smaller freqs.
#previously: converge 30 1
137692.91 #scalar octave of 2765636 (divide by e^3)
176024.47 #3535546
181506.08 #3645647
172614.5 #3467055
172623.47 #3467235
converge .25 .05 #5 1
172628.2 #3467330
172631.18 #3467390
172656.57 #3467900
172661.55 #3468000
converge .5 .05 #10 1
172632.43 #3467415
converge 2 .05 #40 1
172640.39 #3467575
172662.55 #3468020
converge 33 1
763545
666767
665386
634671
563124
554365
296214
264224
247458
187613
141346
134443
converge 4 0.1
1902 317 #CAFL list freqs that work
end repeat


My setup was not perfect. My photo for the ABPA was taken by a friend on his 7.1 megapixel camera and then he printed it on a very nice printer with photo quality paper (I do not know the dpi, but it is a brand new printer). However, I must assume that his camera translated the picture to a jpg (he plugs the memory card directly into the printer and I could not review the file on my pc) which maybe resulted in information loss. And then the picture itself would not fit in the ABPA well so I have it folded in half.

I am curious about the frequency running on channel B: 64hz with a 75% duty cycle. Is there a working theory behind this or was it established via the aurameter?

You had mentioned using a carrier frequency of the actual pathogen...this implies that channel B, in this case the 64hz wave, is what is modulating the carrier, channel A (which runs the actual pathogenic numbers).

I feel like I need some kind of working-theory FAQ to help explain general ideas underneath this stuff. In trying to experiment or modify my program for testing purposes, I feel I really dont benefit from people's experience out there because I miss the point behind what is being done...[the purpose and selection of the channel B frequency, for example].

Thank goodness for this forum!

dave

The use of "pulse 64 75" in the F100 program modulates the primary frequency with a 64hz wave at 75% duty cycle. This means that the square wave (which I always use and runs by default in the F100 series devices) is positive 75% of the time and 0 voltage 25% of the time when run in offset mode.

Turf, who runs the Yahoo group electroherbalism, first pointed out that this helps absorption of the frequency by the body or by pathogens in the body. Working with other clinicians, I have tested this out using the Aurameter on hundreds of people and found that for general purposes 64hz and 75% duty cycle work well.

Since the ABPA seems to run in cycles of 40 seconds (mine actually seems to take 42 seconds), I wonder if there might be any benefit in running frequencies for durations of multiples of this.

My idea: If each light on the ABPA represents an individual step in a process, then the frequency should run at least for 40 seconds minimum to assure that all steps have been run in the process.

Often times when running convergences, the individual frequencies may only be held for a portion of this time (for example, 10 seconds or less). Maybe the full benefit of their value had not been achieved because the ABPA had not fully processed it.

Just a thought.

It is important to run the ABPA for a full cycle as the inventor has embedded safety codes which assure that the body is balanced properly and these are only complete after a full cycle.

I'm normally running frequencies for much longer than a cycle so do not need to worry about it.

Edited by author 07-09-2005 12:13 PM
Was looking over your posted frequencies for Lyme and am trying to figure out what the significance of the commented out frequencies is.... At first I thought that the commented out frequencies were the actual frequencies that you come up with via the Aurameter and the frequencies below them were calculated scalar frequencies, but your latest addition (the third set of freqs) to the Lyme set doesn't seem to follow that pattern or I'm just missing it.

Also noted what may be a typo on the first set of Lyme freqs?

11565.02975 scalar octave - all active frequencies are scalar octaves below

should this be;
11565.02975 #scalar octave - all active frequencies are scalar octaves below

thanks for posting your work and these frequencies

You are correct. There was a typo in the Lyme frequency program and I have corrected it as you indicated.

The primary frequencies are generated from the scalar octaves by the vbackfreq command. This produces, in effect, a primary frequency carrier wave with the scalar octave superimposed on it.

Experiments have shown that this works best.

Some important frequencies were added to the Lyme program on 10 July and more typos corrected.
http://www.frequencyresearch.org/2005/07/u...-just-in-ticks.html

I encourage everyone to join the Google group which will replace this list by the end of the year:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/ElectronicMedicine