What do you think I should aim for? City council,Mayor...?

I want to be like Hillary!

Christine Beatty,baby!

me,me,me

I heard that FSS out of the Pontiac plant is now on hold because of the low flat volume. Is this true?

Nice try Lorena,political figures have words not actions.

Post 1855 is not me someone thinks it's cute now to try use my name. oh well----have fun, but remember the moderator of this forum can tell who's isp is who's!

hey proud,
as long as she doesnt cut and paste!!! lol!!!!

Edited by author 08-25-2008 07:17 AM
Beany baby-
The Postal act of 2006 repealed the requirement of the USPS paying for CSRS retirement benefits earned by postal employees during their military service and placed that burden back to the treasury where it belongs.

The Postal service continues to be responsible for FERS military retirement benefits just like it has been since FERS was enacted over 2 decades ago. This should be changed and argued about but it is nothing new. It is also a much smaller amount per employee than the CSRS was.

You say we should end the escrow. I assume you are talking about the retiree healthcare fund. Having such a fund is good business and good for workers (at least for those who make it to retirement). Not having such a fund means that basically workers are being promised a benefit that is not being paid for. This is the type of benefit that frequently isn't there when needed by workers. Decades of the UAW negotiating generous retiree health care benefits without requiring the employer to fund them is the main reason the big 3 and the UAW are in the positions they are in now. Such a benefit is usually one of the first "costs" to go when a company runs into trouble.
Now the USPS has been operating for decades without funding this so the catch-up costs are huge and we could argue about what the rate of catch-up should be but I cannot think of any legitimate argument for the fund not existing.

P.S. For descrimination to occur to those over 40 doesn't there have to be a worker under 40 in the office:-). They can be tough to find.

re: 1863: Uncommon: Thank you for the very informative explanation of the Postal Act of 2006. What amazes me is all the articles I read were contrary and USPS just kept crying poor mouth. When one reads the entire act I see what your saying. I did not mean that the retiree's should not have this benefit, what I meant was the government should take the responsibilty back.

 All the other government agencies get supplements and it is my understanding the P.O. used to get them but now they don't, thus their reason for trying to be a profitable business versus breaking even as years back. Much of the chaos started when this happened, once the P.O. was no longer considered non profit, the service and quality went out the window and quantity became their priority.

The Postal Act of 2006: http://www.usps.com/postallaw/_html/PostalLaw.html#eight

P.S. When you work in a plant there's always someone under 40--most of the supervisors are under 40--the newbees.

Edited by author 08-25-2008 10:28 AM
/m1863 In just so many words...

What amazes me is that blames are now shifted to the articles instead of reader who did not understood them.

Ain't no bees.

don't want your name used?

sign-in!

can't sign in?

register your name. that way every Quick Topic forum you go to, you can use the same name.

postalvet: What I don't understand is the audacity how some people will assume a posters name making up things that the real poster did not say. Is is because they lack the courage to make statements in their own name, or are they just not creative enough to think up a name for themselves--whatever the case it's really stupid and childish in my estimation.

oh,don't be such anal retentive take my 2cents and buy yourself some sense of humor.

Edited by author 08-27-2008 11:37 PM
re 1868 Monica: If I didn't have a great sense of humor then I would not keep coming back to much of the idiotic stuff that goes on in this forum.

 My point was if someone can't think up their own name don't rob someone elses. But I am sure that the adults that are in this forum can tell who is who even when people plagiarize/assume others identities.

And it's my guess your not even a real "Monica" either.

of course she is Monica