But if "Afghanistan AND Iraq", why not AND Syria AND NK AND China, all at once? Or gee, maybe that would stretch our resources too far.

Iraq was not as urgent as Bush and Blair said; we should have been spending those resources on getting bin Laden and waited on Iraq. I bet we'd have at least Osama by now, and that would be more important to our security than what we're doing there now.

9/11 was Osama's thing, remember?