QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Societal Implications of Nanotechnology
Views: 4293, Unique: 1651 
Subscribers: 1
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 4-12  3-3 of 12  1-2 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
Todd  3
09-09-2003 11:53 AM ET (US)
I think philosophers agree that ethics is the study of what is right and wrong - they just can't agree on what those things are ;)

As for governments taking ethical considerations into mind, my reflex is to say no unless it benefits them in terms of public perception. I think I see an example in the current debate over stem cell research and GM food. In the US, where abortion is a hotly divisive topic, there is reluctance by government to allow stem cell research. When it comes to genetically modififed organisms/foods, there is almost no resistance by government and behold, almost no strong, unified opposition to GM foods from the populace. What is right and wrong for politicians is a mirror of what people think is right and wrong, because that spells out what the politicians will get away with. That's the extent to which I think they'll take ethics into consideration.
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 4-12  3-3 of 12  1-2 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.