| Who | When |
Messages | |
|
|
|
| admin
|
1
|
 |
|
09-23-2003 09:13 PM ET (US)
|
|
Hi everyone! Of course, there is no real one topic here other than crafting and sailing our models, that in itself has many side topics, such as, your favourite beach, comment on a Fairlead article, talk about the model you have made. Ask for help, or give advice. Tell us about interesting (nautical related) web sites you have come across, feel free to contribute what ever you like. Keep in mind, like all forums, there is a monitor, (me) and offensive, or junk messages will get thrown overboard! A single thread message board, is (kinda) interesting, and its ease of use may stir up more participation than the regular type. Subscribers to our newsletter have access to one just like this. As a new thing on our site, Im taking a wait and see approach for now, if you would prefer a multi thread board, with registration, password, and all the bells n whistles, let us know!
|
| davie jones
|
2
|
 |
|
10-10-2003 07:37 PM ET (US)
|
|
What model is faster Mark2 or Mark3? with same sails?
|
| Admin
|
3
|
 |
|
10-11-2003 10:55 PM ET (US)
|
|
I have not yet rigged the two exactly the same and tried. My hunch would be the MkII, based on the experience I have had so far. When combined, the three hulls are equal in displacement as the monohull MkII. But the MkIII really hugs the surface water, so there is little heeling. There is more lift, less drag when a MkII heels.
The MkIII has just been developed, the trick with the design was coming up with a main hull and amas that had enough buoyancy and generate lift on the forward end to counteract the nose-diving thrust on the hull from the sails. The last model I made (the trimaran with the blue and yellow sails seen on homepage) is quite fast, yet I know (after the fact) that the model can handle more sail area.
Although the MkII may be a little faster, the MkIII can handle sailing conditions that the MkII will not.
|
| Doobee
|
4
|
 |
|
02-14-2004 03:09 PM ET (US)
|
|
I like the way you show how to shape the keel. My model is now much faster after I made it smaller and put some shape to it. What is the best way to make another keel?
|
| Admin
|
5
|
 |
|
02-20-2004 01:08 PM ET (US)
|
|
I recommend using a strip of untreated cedar shingle, it already has a taper, you then just have to smooth it down, cut to length, and fair it into a foil. Other woods will do if its sealed. If you have a bench sander, take a strip of wood a little more than a 1/4" thick (and longer than you need, about a foot long) and grind away on the surface on one end, until you get a level taper that will wedge into the well. (Let the wood drag along the sanders surface.) Then trim off the ends and fair it in. A belt sander will also work if you secure it in a vice somehow.
|
| Stuart Harwood
|
6
|
 |
|
06-24-2004 01:28 PM ET (US)
|
|
Can you give me some idea how much sail a MKII can carry because I would like to try the sort of sail you find on a Dhow at present a single sail comes out at about 600 cm squared that is about two thirds of a square yard that seams an awful lot of sail can a MKII cut it?
|
| Admin
|
7
|
 |
|
07-20-2004 01:39 PM ET (US)
|
|
That would be a heck of a lot of sail area for a model that is only 16in. long (:-0 Keep in mind our models are un-balasted centre-boarders, too much sail area will garantee a knockdown in no time... the largest single sail, I rigged on one was aprox 98 sq inches and a lateen at that. See the article called "Extreeme Lateen" http://www.seadercraft.com/boats.htmlAbout a foot and a half sq. would be tops. for a MkII
|
| krazykid79@hotmail.com
|
8
|
 |
|
02-04-2005 04:52 PM ET (US)
|
|
Deleted by author 02-04-2005 04:53 PM
|
| krazykid79@hotmail.com
|
9
|
 |
|
02-04-2005 04:54 PM ET (US)
|
|
i am a student at CAMS and have to build a sailboat. i was wondering which would be better to use? - plastic or wood? for the base? i am limited on what i am able to spend. (15 dollars max) i need to learn about sail boats and if the mast material should or could be a plastic sheet cut to size?... can anyone help? PLEASE!!!!!
|
| Stuart Harwood
|
10
|
 |
|
02-05-2005 11:57 AM ET (US)
|
|
I would use wood every time as it is easier to work with and as for the plastic mast forget it it would not last two seconds I intend to use a metal tube as this will enable me to do away with most of the standing rigging associated with most yachts.
|
| Kimberley
|
11
|
 |
|
03-06-2005 03:32 AM ET (US)
|
|
Deleted by author 03-06-2005 03:33 AM
|
| Paul
|
12
|
 |
|
03-07-2005 05:08 AM ET (US)
|
|
Hiya,
looking at the lateen rigged model on this site, I was wondering if you could explain to me how it changes tack? Do you have to bring the spar vertical and then raise it on the other side of the mast?
Many thanks,
Paul
|
| stuart harwood
|
13
|
 |
|
03-09-2005 12:13 PM ET (US)
|
|
I am afraid I do not know. What you suggest might work but only if the spar is set right which is dependant on where you set the mast you must be carful not to set it too far back or the mast will extend to far in front for you tilt it up and swap over. You could ofcourse just try changing tack without swapping the spar might work. --- QT - Paul <qtopic+23-RQSj4WySG2c@quicktopic.com> wrote: > > Regards Stuart mansfield_marauder@yahoo.co.uk Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com < replied-to message removed by QT >
|
| JMc
|
14
|
 |
|
03-15-2005 10:02 PM ET (US)
|
|
Re:Lateen sail. . . You don't have to 'dip and switch' when changing tack, although the sail will preform better when the spar is on the leeward side of the mast, there is not that much difference. When I go for a sail, I set up the lateen rig to suit the prevailing wind, so that the sail is set on the leeward side, most of the time.
|