QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Camp X-ray trials
Printer-Friendly Page
All messages    << 119-131  118-118 of 131  102-117 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom    (not accepting new messages)
S.M. Stirling  118
06-14-2006 07:38 PM ET (US)
Dave Bell I think that definitely puts some limits on how much you can ignore the Convention if Al Qaeda or Afghanistan are not "High Contracting Parties".

-- nope. The rules apply only to the contracting parties vs. a vs. each other; they're mutual concessions and confer no "human rights" on individuals.

At the broadest plausible interpretation, they could apply to a side which _explicitly accepts_ the Conventions and which _in practice makes a good-faith effort to abide by them_.

Since neither of those conditions is applicable to the Taliban or al Qaeda and their ilk, the Conventions are simply irrelevant. We're under no restrain but our own unilateral will here.
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 119-131  118-118 of 131  102-117 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.