cheapest, best service have it on
wow gold .
so many wonderful things you can enjon it not only cheapest price,best distrubition,all from
wow leveling,
warcraft power leveling
warcraft gold promptly,best service only get it from
wow power leveling
FFXI Gil
Buy FFXI Gil
FFXI Gil Sale
Cheapest FFXI Gil
Buy Cheap FFXI Gil
final Fantasy XI Gil
Cheap FFXI Gil



cheapestwow gold
best distrubition,all fromus wow gold
euro wow gold
world of warcraft gold

As an artist myself I'm all for the extra exposure. Royalties or not.

Listen to these dudes: http://www.cdbaby.com/rivalmenace

/m25

How Muzak differs legally from the DJ scheme is that Muzak has all the requisite license agreements in place and pays royalties from their subscription fees.

Having just got back from gigging and read MR Von L's opinion.
1. WHAT IF B5's using completely different music on each ipod. No multiple copies, just the one legal backup of data (music digitized being considered as data)?
2. What of the non BMI/ASCAP music? is there (legal)exposure for anyone there. This smells more and more like the sampling rights debacle crashing into the "digital music is really just data" mess.
Heaven help us all.

And CUE does rule with good selection and smart friendly staff.

/m20

Muzak doesn't just provide recreations of hits, they also provide streams consisting of original recordings. I work in a store that has music piped in via satellite by Muzak, and it's basically a radio station without commercials.

They provide different channels for different markets; our store has some kind of "slightly hip top 40 rock/dance" thing going on, from Madonna to Granddaddy, while stores in the south have their receivers set to the country stream.

Hard to see how this differs legally from B5.

Funny how people got bent out of shape because you can't "rock the spot" with an iPod... if more DJs paid attention to vibe as B5 apparently does, they'd "rock out" less and focus on proper selection. By the way, Cue is an excellent shop. I'd say it's the best of its kind that I've been to... Respect.

What bothers me is that the copyright regime that makes this business a problem hurts indies more than it helps the majors... plus there's the sheer stupidity of it, in that exposure = sales.

Man, this internet. I love it. Post an article 'bout some dude, within a few days, the dude himself can respond to it.

The dude abides.

Edited by author 06-14-2003 12:54 AM
First off this is crazy...I am a DJ & part owner of Cue Records a small record store in Philly who is trying to expose good music be it, trip hop, hip hop, reggae, Cuban, bossa, afro-beat, house , D&B funk/soul….the music we sell in my store!!! Most independent artists do not get radio airplay and the only way they get heard in Philadelphia (our radio is extremely weak) is in my store or stores like mine or DJ’s buying music & playing it out…I do music design in a few shops and do not charge them. They are more hip cool spots, so hopefully people ask what is playing and find out where to get it …and to get those artists paid. I’m trying to find a way to market good music & sell more of it at my store….to expose people to good music that they don’t hear everyday… The City Paper article kind of blew it up before the project really started. I am doing this for the love of the music not money, I am not putting 50 Cent or Destiny's Child in the mix, and I’m trying to expose noncommercial music. This project has been conceived by a DJ/Independent Record Store Owner not to replace DJ's or steal music, but to turn a wider audience on to better music locally.


Adam Porter

What's interesting to me, re: the Update II info, is that if the same DJ, instead of renting out the Ipod, walked in with the self same Ipod, and the self same songs, and pressed "Play" himself at the start of the evening, stood there all night, and pressed "Stop" at the end, he'd probably be OK legally. But since he's providing a device with copyrighted material, rather than himself playing the same device, he could be in serious trouble.

Edited by author 06-14-2003 12:12 AM
/m15
I think that Muzak is a somewhat different beast, in that they are not simply replaying existing recordings - they actually produce new versions of the songs. In fact, I know that it is extremely lucrative for an artist to have their material used by Muzak - if you could live with the shame, you could do a lot worse as a songwriter than to have your back catalog drenched in syrup and served up in half the supermarkets of America! So, although I'm not sure of the gory details, I do know that Muzak's model is quite legal and above-board.

I think the idea of an iPod is you can copy music onto it, but not supposed to be able to download off of it. Don't have one yet, but I'll get one when the 50gig comes out.

i haven't read the whole thread, but the real question to me is whether the d.j. takes back his only copy of the mp3 set, or allows purchasers to make copies for themselves. spinning in clubs is fine. selling copies is not. there's grey here, because, as pointed out, this is basically a rental service. but i have no problem with that concept, since i see it as something akin to a "first sale," the rights to which are in the initial buyer (ostensibly, here, the d.j.). he could sell his copy, so i think the grey of the rentals comes out in his favor. woe unto him, though, if the club owners are burning their own copies of his sets, and, as pointed out above, especially if he knows they're doing so.

/m15
I believe that Musak has to also have licenses in place.

/m5
Also, the ASCAP/BMI licenses that are in place are often just to play a Radio and the radio station also has licenses in place.

He is going to have serious problems. Of course the RIAA will just take away his life savings and all of his iPods.

Neat idea, bad implementation.

[Background: Had a idea like this but using small custom devices (therefore no one would really want to take it as it has no other use) and the licensing stuff was too much so I dumped the idea... "...yes, that is right Mr. Moose, we need $125,000 in upfront licensing fees..."]

So how does copywrite law interface with traditional DJ-ing? Is is permissible by default to play records in a public setting? Does every nightclub and bar need permission to play pre-recorded music?

This is, in essense if not in details, the business that Muzak is in. (see http://www.muzak.com/)

I strongly suspect that there is a very simple and legal way to be in this business, Muzak's been doing it or variations thereof for decades.