QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Next up: Giant blind albino penguins
Views: 2309, Unique: 1650 
Subscribers: 1
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages            2-17 of 17  1-1 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
David MercerPerson was signed in when posted  2
07-02-2003 11:58 PM ET (US)
Remember, Vote Cthulhu in 2004!

Don't settle for the lesser evil!
Denise CzajaPerson was signed in when posted  3
07-03-2003 01:35 AM ET (US)
i may be missing a joke here. i read the entire story from your previous link. long-winded but compelling. is that supposed to be a true account from a real person or fiction? was the eye photoshopped on or off? i'm gullible, so don't tease me! i really want to know about the image and the history of that story.
Denise CzajaPerson was signed in when posted  4
07-03-2003 01:38 AM ET (US)
uh, nevermind. i did a search on the author. i am assuming the eye was added. i told you i was gullible.
Marc LaidlawPerson was signed in when posted  5
07-03-2003 01:51 AM ET (US)
I can only imagine that was probably the best possible frame of mind in which to encounter "At the Mountains of Madness" for the first time. Lucky. A lesser author than Lovecraft, and you'd never have doubted for a second that you were reading fiction.

Don't be embarrassed. I was once taken in by the ludicrous prologue of Lin Carter's ghastly Jandar of Callisto. Now that is embarrassing.
Stefan JonesPerson was signed in when posted  6
07-03-2003 02:07 AM ET (US)
Mountains of Madness was the first Lovecraft I read. "Scared" is the wrong word for how it made me feel. "Infused with horrific bleakness" perhaps.
Werner  7
07-03-2003 03:09 AM ET (US)
The eye has been added.
The original can be seen here:
http://www.dn.se/DNet/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=5...reviousRenderType=2
Denise CzajaPerson was signed in when posted  8
07-03-2003 08:01 AM ET (US)
it was exactly the right frame of mind to read that story! heh. my only suspicions were the name of the university and the fact that if that place really existed i would have heard of it before now. science ruins everything.

thanks for exposing me to the author.
Guest56  9
07-03-2003 11:36 AM ET (US)
Denise, you said - "my only suspicions were the name of the university and the fact that if that place really existed i would have heard of it before now." Yet, you seem to have never heard of H.P. Lovecraft.

In the future (and for your own sake), I would recommend you not using your existing knowledge base as a tool for establishing fact from fiction.
CynicalRectumMan  10
07-03-2003 12:36 PM ET (US)
What a fuckin bunch of plebian morons! Lovercraft was a fucking twit! Like most of his fans... Only a fucking twit would believe what they see on the NeT!
Marc LaidlawPerson was signed in when posted  11
07-03-2003 12:53 PM ET (US)
Well now you've gone and touched a nerve. And yet...since I too read S.T. Joshi's scholarly LOVECRAFT: A FUCKING TWIT, I can take it on the chin. In fact, I am determined this will be the most scathing, hotly contested, eye-watering, no-holds-barred "At the Mountains of Madness" thread on the entire internet! Go for it! No troll shall go unanswered!
Denise Czaja  12
07-03-2003 01:41 PM ET (US)
I had not heard of H.P. Lovecraft and I didn't rely on my existing knowledge base as a tool for establishing fact from fiction. I used Google and I asked Marc.

By "if that place really existed", I meant the mountains of madness in Antarctica, not the university.

Look, I'd like to believe that place was true. Not knowing that the writing was fiction, I honestly read that story thinking that it might have been a real article that was later discredited by science and that's why I had never heard of those mountains in Antarctica. That's why I said, "Science ruins everything". Back in 1931-32, it would have been very difficult to prove or disprove this story. Now we just take a satellite photo of an area in question.
xradiographerPerson was signed in when posted  13
07-03-2003 02:24 PM ET (US)
CynicalRectumMan doesn't exist becuase I saw him on the net.
Marc Laidlaw  14
07-03-2003 02:35 PM ET (US)
Hey! It's "NeT"! You gotta get with it, or you're not gonna be able to hang wit these crazy, happening kids.
jonlPerson was signed in when posted  15
07-03-2003 03:20 PM ET (US)
You're missing the real point: we're having Cthulhu for dinner... (parboiled).
Marc Laidlaw  16
07-03-2003 04:42 PM ET (US)
Hi, jonl!
...  17
07-06-2003 06:41 PM ET (US)
Denise, post 12 is dead-on. Wish I could have read Lovecraft in the thirties. (Without seeing the cover of the pulp magazine I was holding, I guess. (Which hits on what's so cool about the net--no covers.))
RSS link What's this?
All messages            2-17 of 17  1-1 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.