QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: downs dolls
Views: 1197, Unique: 598 
Subscribers: 0
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom   
Post a new message
 
Doc Downs  9
07-26-2007 01:20 PM ET (US)
What about Browny Downys love toys!!!
Keldene  8
03-07-2006 04:49 PM ET (US)
Hello, I am 15 yrs old from England. These Downs dolls are so offensive. What'll happen next? Dolls with cerebal palsy or other disabilities. This really p****s me off. The disability is not who the person is.. GOD people get this into your thick American skulls. My sister is eight and beautiful and just happens to have downs syndrome. You people will probably have never come into proper contact with a child with a disability and if you have then you have no decency or conscience. You should be ashamed of yourselves. If I were American I'd sue!!
mkrier2  7
03-23-2004 06:08 PM ET (US)
Bob  6
05-28-2003 10:06 AM ET (US)
So... they're saying "don't steal our images"? What's wrong with that?...
chico haasPerson was signed in when posted  5
05-27-2003 01:01 PM ET (US)
I think one of the main purposes for dolls and stuffed animals is to let kids care for and protect something that, without them, would be unable to look after itself. They give kids the chance to replicate yet another grownup activity - love of something smaller. Whether a doll or stuffed animal completely resembles the child or any owner is irrelevant. A stuffed tiger needn't appear to have Down's Syndrome to appeal to a Down's Syndrome person. It only needs to be what it is, something that's helpless without its caregiver. But, hey, if it works better, wtf? A teddy bear with a penis - I suppose there's already a market for that and it's not kids.
Jennifer  4
05-27-2003 12:34 PM ET (US)
Yes, but would I want to pay two hundred dollars for a doll that looked like me? At prices that high, the enterprise seems more exploitive than enlightened to me...
cerebrocrat  3
05-26-2003 10:08 PM ET (US)
It's a shame the siteowners feel so threatened by people linking there "for the wrong reasons." I'm sure it's true that they're getting traffic from people looking for a freak show, (or more innocently, just out of curiosity) but all of those people who come there for the wrong reasons at least have the opportunity to be exposed to it and think about it. If I had Down's Syndrome, would I want a doll that looked like me? I have no @#$%ing idea, but at least I've now thought about it. I never would have otherwise.
Stefan JonesPerson was signed in when posted  2
05-26-2003 08:22 PM ET (US)
If you buy your own Full o'Guts bear, and take your own pictures of its sucking chest wound, can you post THEM on the web?
Art Veitch  1
05-26-2003 06:41 PM ET (US)
Wow, what a sucktacular linkage policy. Though I can understand not wanting people to link to the images alone, rather than the site itself, but that's more of an etiquette thing rather than a We Will Sue You thing. Or at least it should be.
RSS link What's this?
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2006 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.