Edited by author 04-04-2003 04:13 AM
> Prove to me that he didn't send the money.

Well, actually, this is America, and it has to be proven both that he sent the money and that he sent it knowing that it would go to fund terrorism. It's not up to the defense, me, you, or anyone else to prove he didn't send it.

He is presumed innocent, and the burden of proof for claims to the contrary falls on his accusors.

As for him being a terrorist: You're a fucking moron. He hasn't been charged with a crime. . .ANY crime. Sure, he might be a terrorist, but so might you, Jill, and right now, the evidence to back up either claim is about equivalent.