Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Topic: Rural Carrier Discussions (cont.)
Printer-Friendly Page
   << 33275-33284  33259-33274 of 33284  33243-33258 >>
Who | When
Messagessort recent-bottom    (not accepting new messages)
troll of many handles  33274
07-14-2006 04:43 PM ET (US)
Jill 053 /m33273 Jeepers, what brought THAT on? I thought me and you were closer than that. x0x0x0x0x
Jill 053  33273
07-14-2006 04:22 PM ET (US)
Go play in the street troll!
troll of many handles  33272
07-14-2006 04:04 PM ET (US)
slimeball /m33266 I am proud that you want me for your dad. But, I have to tell you, you HAVE no daddy.
troll of many handles  33271
07-14-2006 03:51 PM ET (US)
ILYT /m33268 Many thanks. I hope to be there for you too, if you ever need it.
PSD  33270
07-14-2006 03:49 PM ET (US)
RCA, no
rcaforeverPerson was signed in when posted  33269
07-14-2006 01:02 PM ET (US)
When you transfer you take your seniority date with you, IF they transfered as a regular carrier......right ???? Like a mutual transfer........
ILYT  33268
07-14-2006 08:44 AM ET (US)
troll of many handles /m33256

I am here for you too troll. Now, you are only outnumbered 25 to one.
3rd time aroundPerson was signed in when posted  33267
07-14-2006 07:30 AM ET (US)
/m33265 Rayt - After reading the contract on this, they appear to not have addressed that issue specifically. All other things being equal, when RCA A transferred into the office with RCA B, he/she lost the previous 3 months of seniority (even though it was added to the 1-year continuous service calculation) and was placed after carrier B "in the office". If only one of them had made regular, it would have been B over A. Following that logic, carrier B would have seniority over A in all instances. In awarding a route on bid, the RCA with the longest continuous service "in the office" is awarded the route over one who has transferred in after them from another office even if the transferree has more accumulated service overall. The contract and the analysis have left this ambiguous. Who had the first choice of routes when both of them became regular on the same day; probably B.
slimeball  33266
07-14-2006 01:51 AM ET (US)
troll, the dna tests came back and you are my daddy
rayt333Person was signed in when posted  33265
07-14-2006 12:11 AM ET (US)
gtownvp
In your example carrier "A" would win the tiebreaker because the "length of service as a RCA"
RR5Person was signed in when posted  33264
07-13-2006 09:03 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 07-13-2006 09:08 PM
/m33262 gtownvp
Article 12, section 2.
Very lengthly and involved. Read it carefully.

/m33263 homer
Contract negotiations are not discussed in a public forum. Negotiations do not officially start until 90 days prior to the expiration of the current contract. My GUESS is an extension is not likely.
Mail count, it depends on any new language in the new contract so it is unknown at this point.
homer  33263
07-13-2006 09:01 PM ET (US)
any word on a new contract? extension? count?
gtownvp  33262
07-13-2006 08:40 PM ET (US)
I have a question regarding seniority. Carrier A was hired by the postal service 3 months prior to Carrier B. Carrier A was originally hired in one office and then transferred to the office where carrier B was. They both made regular on the same day and now are bidding on a new posting. Who has seniority? There are no breaks in service for either carrier.
logic  33261
07-13-2006 08:35 PM ET (US)
regarding 33252, if the OIC didn't know, why didn't she look it up? I work in a little two person office and my PO would know the answer.
logic  33260
07-13-2006 08:30 PM ET (US)
Had a couple of postal employees come to our PO today to check for handcaped accessibility. Found a few things that didn't meet criteria. Like only 54 inches of sidewalk from the front door to the sidewalk. Sidewalk had a drop of 2.2 degrees instead of the allowed 2 degrees, etc.
  I'd say they spent an hour and a half or so. Came from just about 200 mile away. Commented as they left, "Well, since you have less than ten employees here, I guess we can waive all of these infractions".
  I'm laughing because it is just so pathetic, you either have to laugh, cry, or blow your head off. It just seems so illogical to bust the chops of so many good hard working employees busting their ass, and then blow $$ on something like this.
  Not to mention, if there is something that makes the PO handicapped inaccesible, what difference does it make to a handicapped person if there is less than ten employees?
  Sorry, I'm just tired of this stupid BS.
midwest rc  33259
07-13-2006 07:08 PM ET (US)
 /m33236 I don't think your PM can hold you in the office and make you go back out to collect mail at a business, BUT it is up to management to set your starting time. They can conceivably make you start late enough that you are at that business when their mail is ready to be picked up. Hopefully that won't happen to you.
RSS link What's this?
   << 33275-33284  33259-33274 of 33284  33243-33258 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.