| Who | When |
Messages | |
|
|
|
| Eli the Bearded
|
1
|
 |
|
12-12-2002 02:33 PM ET (US)
|
|
The female monkeys were drawn to the pot because it was pink? What if there was a pink Barbie car in there, I wonder.
|
Higgins Whilshire IV, Esq
|
2
|
 |
|
12-12-2002 02:35 PM ET (US)
|
|
I blame the schools for the monkey gender oppression. No wonder there is so many monkey knife fights.
|
| lulu the child psychologi
|
3
|
 |
|
12-12-2002 02:45 PM ET (US)
|
|
I actually did the same experiment but with kids and found also that there is a predisposition to gender specific toys... The kids who didn't have a firm sexual identity however (which is usually developed by the age of 4) seemed to choose the opposite sex specific toys as much as the ones for their own gender.
|
mrm
|
4
|
 |
|
12-12-2002 04:34 PM ET (US)
|
|
How would monkeys determine that a doll or a pot is a female toy, while a car or ball is a male toy? What rational explanation can this scientist offer to show a gender bias when providing abstract toys like this?
If the scientist spoke a language with gendered nouns, would the interpretation be different? Speaking German, I think the monkeys playing with cars are androgynous.
|
| Eli the Bearded
|
5
|
 |
|
12-12-2002 05:52 PM ET (US)
|
|
The claim is that cars and balls are male because they are movement related.
The doll is female for nurturing reasons, the pot is female because it is pink.
|
Hannah Kincaid
|
6
|
 |
|
12-12-2002 07:09 PM ET (US)
|
|
I haven't been able to find a trustworthy link that nails it down with any certainty, but I'm under the impression the blue/pink code is a product of the 20th century and has its roots in Victoriana. Remarkable of the monkeys to pick up on that... Good, churchgoing monkeys, I'll bet.
|
Eli the Bearded
|
7
|
 |
|
12-13-2002 03:27 PM ET (US)
|
|
Blue and pink is recent, culturally. It used to be red was for boys (a good color, strong like blood) and blue for girls.
|