Edited by author 02-07-2006 01:01 PM
Really sorry about that.

He isn’t above the law if he is doing all of that!

Also you said you write fiction, What is your author name so I can see?

Back to biometrics: I am completely against it as it sounds like something from the book of Revelation. ‘Because We Can Syndrome’ again. Think! But gov doesn’t think, they just do, because they have power. I just like how they announce this stuff without first stating how it is exactly to be used and then we vote on it, but like I said, before with government we elect politicians to ‘represent’ us. There is no fullproof system (only measures) and I don't feel like personally becomming a punching bag for criminals.

Way to invasive. Like if they can come up with something to stop someone from cutting off a body part of mine to steal eggs then I'm in but I don't think so.
So this could be the single most invasive technology ever devised and therefore should be relegated to something more private like maybe entering into the bathroom in your home and that's about it.
FIGHT IT!

Also Google is offering the 'personal search history service.'
OK, fine I opt out, but who would opt in unless you’re a nun? I certainly don’t want a store manager spying on me as I browse his aisles I think I, at least, have that much privacy. If it is a large transaction that's fine for them to keep a receipt. I just don’t see it. Your giving someone your life history for Convenance. All your loves, desires, anger hatred...It’s arrogance.
In my apartment, I rent it but the landlord doesn't shine a camera on me and then promise not to show it to anybody else. There is a personal agreement that I will not be bothered while inside the apartment and everyone does that unless they are living with someone else, but even then, and do you trust a large cold cooperation to manage your life?
People should live for themselves instead of being pampered. Society needs to suck in some fresh air and live life.