QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Direct vs. Feature-Based Methods
Views: 154, Unique: 125 
Subscribers: 1
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages            3-3 of 3  1-2 >>
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
Josh Wills  3
10-22-2002 01:36 PM ET (US)
I am also a strong proponent of the feature based methods, but I think the direct methods definately still have a place in matching work.

First of all, for short baseline pairs and for frames with differential motion, direct methods blow feature based methods out of the water. I have yet to see any feature-based method solve the flower garden sequence (which happens to be basically a toy problem for the direct people).

That said, if coarse-to-fine processing really makes direct methods on par with feature based methods for large disparity, where is a successful piece of research doing just that?
RSS link What's this?
All messages            3-3 of 3  1-2 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.