| Who | When |
Messages | |
|
|
|
| OSP Run
|
34
|
 |
|
10-27-2002 10:10 PM ET (US)
|
|
Edited by author 10-27-2002 10:10 PM
does anyone know how to run this? after we compile with make...i got no errors after I compile...and then to run i am just typing osp par.low and it is telling me bad command...any ideas? anyone?
|
| Rafal
|
35
|
|
|
10-27-2002 10:34 PM ET (US)
|
|
To run you probably need to type ./OSP par.low
You need ./ and remember that CASE matters, and I think the file is upper case ( the one that gets compiled )
|
| thanks
|
36
|
|
|
10-27-2002 10:55 PM ET (US)
|
|
Rafal: Thank you very much. I appreciate it. Now one last question. I do not understand that -d option that they talk about in manual. When you run your OSP file. it just has to match with OSP.demo and if it matches then your code is correct? am I right?
./OSP par.low did work. so thanks for that.
|
| Rafal
|
37
|
|
|
10-28-2002 12:18 AM ET (US)
|
|
the -d option is explained in the manual :) But I'll just add and say that you should use it if you are doing the same test over and over ( and changing your code ) to see if you get the same result.
|
| osp
|
38
|
|
|
10-28-2002 12:28 AM ET (US)
|
|
thanks rafal for all your help
|
| David
|
39
|
|
|
10-30-2002 11:26 AM ET (US)
|
|
Edited by author 10-30-2002 11:27 AM
hey guys,
my program is done but when i run it, the output i get is not the same as that of the demo. At times, my program creates more processes or less processes than the demo. It runs alright without any errors. Is anyone having the same problem? Does anyone no how to fix it?
|
| Rafal
|
40
|
|
|
11-01-2002 02:05 AM ET (US)
|
|
1.Do we really need to print out our name, assignment number and name to the screen ? Or is including our info on the top of the cpu.c enough?
2. is the quantum set by the teacher ? or are we suppose to set it ourselves... ? Anyone?
|
| Midterm II
|
41
|
|
|
11-05-2002 05:14 PM ET (US)
|
|
Do guys want to have Midterm next week on 11/12/02? If yes then post your message saying YES.
|
| YES
|
42
|
|
|
11-05-2002 05:15 PM ET (US)
|
|
YES.
|
| YES
|
43
|
|
|
11-05-2002 06:49 PM ET (US)
|
|
YES
|
| Rafal
|
44
|
|
|
11-05-2002 08:14 PM ET (US)
|
|
Yes, definatly.
|
| cc
|
45
|
|
|
11-05-2002 11:50 PM ET (US)
|
|
Yes. It would be much better.
|
| YES
|
46
|
|
|
11-06-2002 11:42 AM ET (US)
|
|
YES it would be great help
|
| Anu
|
47
|
|
|
11-06-2002 02:08 PM ET (US)
|
|
Yes..
|
| cc
|
48
|
|
|
11-06-2002 04:04 PM ET (US)
|
|
Yes
|
| cs385
|
49
|
|
|
11-06-2002 04:52 PM ET (US)
|
|
No...the more it gets delayed...there is gonna be more material to study for...plus more tension...so definitely no...
|
