QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: CS 385 Operating Systems
Views: 1017, Unique: 572 
Subscribers: 4
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 34-49  18-33 of 65  2-17 >>
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
Wut Hang  18
09-30-2002 04:59 PM ET (US)
Is there anyoen willing to form a study group to study for the test on tuesday and wednesday?
Rafal  19
09-30-2002 05:51 PM ET (US)
I am, what time and when? I usually finish after 5pm
Wut Hang  20
09-30-2002 06:03 PM ET (US)
I am done with school after 1:45 pm
Rafal  21
10-02-2002 10:38 PM ET (US)
Can we use calculators on tomorrow's exam?
CS385  22
10-03-2002 11:20 PM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-03-2002 11:21 PM
so how did everyone do in the exam? I think it was pretty fair exam except i could've used more time. But hey this is where they test us, so no complains. Just one request for you professor, if you can post solutions to this exam before tuesday..just can't wait till tuesday.. it will be greatly appreciated.
dale reedPerson was signed in when posted  23
10-18-2002 02:25 AM ET (US)
A few messages back there was a criticism of the TA's not showing up for the "lab" section on Friday's. I have had them hold this session selectively, announcing it to the class each time. This session has run a couple times to go over homework problems, and will run again Friday (today!) in preparation for the programming assignment.
Michael  24
10-18-2002 02:38 AM ET (US)
is anyone having problems copying the files for the programming assignment? i made the directory and as soon as i try to use the copy command it give me an error message reading "cp:no match found". does anyone know what this could be?
Michael  25
10-18-2002 02:44 AM ET (US)
hey i figured it out. when you type out the line:-
cp ~i385/cpu/* .
make sure you put a space between the * and the . or else it does not work.
Project  26
10-26-2002 05:48 PM ET (US)
In the dispatch function, it says
/* Check to see if there is no one to run. If not, set PTBR to NULL, make sure the tail of the queue is set properly and return */

this is what i am thinking: if there is no one runs, then the readyQ_head is empty, so is the readyQ_tail. so why do we need to set the tail?

could some one correct me?
Can We Use STL ?  27
10-26-2002 06:57 PM ET (US)
Hi, are we allowed to use STL in OSP ???
OSP  28
10-26-2002 08:53 PM ET (US)
does anyone know how do we run this simulator? i mean to say after we made changes to cpu.c file how do we know if it is right? let's say i did make after i made changes to cpu.c and i got no errors...what is the step after that? how do we see if the output matches the OSP.demo file. i don't understand that. if anyone knows?
Rafal  29
10-26-2002 09:19 PM ET (US)
We are allowed anything to implement the stack ( my guess ).

There is an error in the turnin line:
turnin -c eecs371a -p fcfs cpu.c

it should be
turnin -c cs385 -p fcfs cpu.c


OSP: after you compile your own cpu.c, compile your own osp, and then run your osp with the paramaters provided and see if you get the same thing.

Just because the cpu.c compiles, doesn't mean it implements round robin.
last_dispatch  30
10-26-2002 10:00 PM ET (US)
do we assign the get_clock() to the last_dispatch in the chosen process(new to run) or to the stopped process(the one in the very beginning) in the dispatch function?
osp  31
10-27-2002 01:50 AM ET (US)
Edited by author 10-27-2002 01:53 AM
hey that is what i am asking? it doesn't run using OSP par.low command
it creates the executable OSP and cpu.o but it doesn't run just by typing OSP.. i think there is some problem
osp warning !!  32
10-27-2002 08:51 PM ET (US)
I got this warning:

Idle CPU with non-empty ready queue.

does anyone have a clue why this happened?
insert_ready  33
10-27-2002 09:13 PM ET (US)
In the inaert_ready() function, the the pcb IS ALREADY in the ready_q when we do the checking. we do nothing quitting the function or we change the pcb status to ready then quit?
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 34-49  18-33 of 65  2-17 >>
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.