Why dont we take the ratings/valuations of companies away from city analysts and the powerful , and put it democratically in the hands of social networks, millions of the world's people on the net around the local grassroots of responsibility

To begin with we can call it a Valuation Fantasy-Reality Game . Mathematically I propose a multiplicative index that goes for 0 to 625 with 1 being the start index of each company and the index being a predictor of the companies total monetary and social growth in a generations time

The nice thing about the multiplier index is if a company does anything totally rotten it gets down valued to zero which is quite a realistic model of how reputational capital works. Of course, proposed re-ratings of companies are subject to conversational threads so we can open up the evidence on what a company is doing that is so transparently good or evils. And technically Transparency valuations are already built around the connectivity of 4 major territories of system organisation which is where we get 0 to 625 when we rate a company's transparency performance standard on each territory with a maturity profile of 0 to 5

I think we could easily co-portalise input and league tables of this game around many of the world's largest social online communities. And in the process turn a Fantasy League pretty close to Reality because in one sense we are simply cataloguing how well or evilly a company performs for humanity and its stakeholders in a structured way. Eventually any self-respecting analyst will want to see that open book information