Edited by author 06-28-2002 11:47 AM
Part of what I'm wondering is whether the problem for the paper was not that Armao showed her bias, but that she reflected a little light upon the squirrelly way the paper actually thinks. The problem of credibility then becomes, "who will believe us if we show people how we really operate?" At which point we begin to suspect that journalism can only attain the illusion of credibility by concealing its beliefs...