top bar
QuickTopic free message boards logo
Skip to Messages

TOPIC:

100 bad albums

^     All messages            24-39 of 39  8-23 >>
39
Peter
02-12-2003
03:13 AM ET (US)
I have never had so many laughs out of the net, not only from the comments this guy has written, but by how many people he has managed to get talking (and most often piss off) by writing them. C'mon people - get a life. This guy is having a ball and all of you (including me [quite happily]) are playing right into his hand.
38
boomer
10-15-2002
07:10 PM ET (US)
What in the hell does this guy listen to then? Just because you don't listen to something as much anymore does not negate it as an album worth trashing.
Some of his entries were right on like "Paul's Boutique" and "Daydream Nation" but when he slagged "You're Living All oVer me" whoa...THAT IS ONE OF THE BEST ALBUMS EVER!!!!Ever! e-v-e-r!!!!
Does this guy even like music? Or did he not fit in with goth/alternative/indie rock clique in high school and now he's lashing out.
I'm surprised he didn't go all the way and talk shit about the Stooges or Pavement.
37
drj
07-26-2002
08:05 PM ET (US)
It was entertaining enough to read all the way through. But there were definitely a few WAY off the mark. Like equating all jazz with masturbation and throwing out Giant Steps. Gimme a break. Coltrane can be an acquired taste, but I found that was mainly because of his tone. As a melodic improviser (it's improvising, not masturbating, by the way) he was a genius. He made some not-so-good albums, but Giant Steps isn't one of them.

Other masterpieces that really are masterpieces and worth keeping: Hunky Dory and Sgt. Pepper. Let it Be is worth keeping, if only for "I've Got a Feeling" and "I Me Mine". And, yeah, Dark Side of the moon is stale, but I can't get rid of it. I was listening to that shit in the 6th grade and it still sounds good to me.

But thanks for letting me feel OK for not liking Tori Amos. I'll be taking Under the Pink back to the CD store now, cuz I never listen to it and I never will.
Edited 07-26-2002 08:06 PM
36
Robin SkylerPerson was signed in when posted
07-22-2002
01:47 PM ET (US)
"Cute," pretty much. And once in a while, spot-on. Often funny even when it's patently personal opinion dressed up as hipper-than-thou categorical censure, which the author claims to repudiate. Much of the time, doesn't even make it as far as "funny."

I had a remarkably low correspondence with his point of view--the Joshua Tree, vs, Synchronicity, Legend? These are seminal albums; if you're going to dis them, you ought to take the time to explain why. But in any event that's not what this guy was about. He leans way too hard on the effort to make you believe that he belongs to some In Crowd that's so hip you don't even know about it. Stranger than the sacred-cow tipping is the aggressive eclecticism he ascribes to the audience: he's posing as the voice of conscience scolding me for owning all these albums out of vanity, and yet he's naming some albums I've never freaking heard of.

My first reaction was just according to his plan: gosh, who let me in here? I must not even be qualified to discuss pop music with this person! I must immediately buy all of these albums, just to catch up, and then throw them away in arch disdain!

And then slowly, my conscious mind arrived on the scene. Hope you had fun, kid. Sorry, not buying.
Edited 07-22-2002 01:47 PM
35
jo / munich
07-22-2002
11:41 AM ET (US)
the guy is a conversative "oh look how creative i can write and how much i know about anything" suckers. the stuff the writes about bitches brew could be by my father.
if you read between the lines it is highly non-p.c.; a little bit of non-p.c. is ok, but in such doses it really isn't funny anymore. just two examples: he complains about keys' anti-machism songs and is against fugazi's anti-sexism songs. why?

jo from germany
34
Zonker
07-22-2002
12:02 AM ET (US)
I can't say I thought much of this list, or his reasoning in a lot of places. I agreed with some of the choices, but mostly he seems to be a musical snob that just wants to show how uber-cool he is by dissing music that's become too mainstream for his tastes. That's his right, of course... but I don't really go in for music-bashing. If a song or album makes you happy, it doesn't really matter if it's technically perfect or the pinnacle of musicianship. If it reaches you in some way, then it's successful.
33
biledemon54
07-21-2002
01:35 PM ET (US)
Well, hmmm... i thint this dude has some definite pros and cons in this list, and obviously (IMHO) NOT a musician. I see it as that he cant deal with the techincal complexity of albums such as Stereolab's "transient noise bursts" and Miles Davis' Bitches Brew, Further things like the genius work related to time signatures in albums like Darkside of the Moon, also escapes the reviewer who compiled the list. In short the reviewer while not being pumped full of "The Next Best Thing" is indeed pumped full of the sentiment anti-musicality that killed the genre of what now is referred to as "classic rock" and spawned the noise-punk movement.
32
KlintPerson was signed in when posted
07-20-2002
08:51 PM ET (US)
Will I go back? Probably. For their blog if nothing else.
31
boingboing addictPerson was signed in when posted
07-20-2002
12:58 AM ET (US)
on an unrelated note, i'd like to point out that that site is b0rked in galeon (a linux browser, in case you don't know), so it's lucky i was browsing at work when i first hit the link.
30
illway
07-19-2002
11:07 PM ET (US)
This is Jaguaro's One Hit Wonder. It's got us talking, but who's going to revisit their site?

Amazing...the boingboing addict confirmed what I said in my post. Some people do enjoy complaining for complaining's sake.

http://www.illway.com/2002_07_14_archives.html#79169413
29
boingboing addictPerson was signed in when posted
07-19-2002
09:30 PM ET (US)
pissing on the masters is fun. it's nice to read something besides marketing copy and gushing fan drivel once in a while. complaining for the sake of complaining is unproductive but enjoyable (in moderation.)
28
msp
07-19-2002
04:19 PM ET (US)

joke or not. ..it's just a shameless pissing on the masters for the sake of attention. it doesn't matter if most of the reasoning presented is a total cop out.

bitches brew is lame because it's hipster fare? something is bad automatically because a certain crowd says it's good? what?

it reads like a laundry list of "greatest" albums by their respective bands alongside obvious bad bands and their top 40 hit albums... i mean the gin blossoms? ???

looks like a piece written in 30 minutes while drinking beers, which would be fitting....

funny i suppose, but does it really make me care to read what else they have to say? south park was funny about n+1 seasons ago too.

m.
http://www.pataphysics-lab.com
27
Klint
07-19-2002
02:37 PM ET (US)
Thanks Jimmy. BTW, Plastic is TOTALLY falling for it right now.
26
Higgins Whilshire IV, EsqPerson was signed in when posted
07-19-2002
02:21 PM ET (US)
When it comes done to an honest well edited opinion. All music guide. Never a more fair and well researched music guide. I never buy an album without listening to a sample MP3 and reading the guide to make sure I'm getting the best of an artist. I usually agree with them 85% of the time.
25
AliasUndercover
07-19-2002
01:12 PM ET (US)
Can I keep an album from this list if I actually LIKE it, and really hae no intention of impressing people with my musical taste/album collection? (Violent Femmes STILL rock, damnit! And I'm 36!)
24
autovac
07-19-2002
12:35 PM ET (US)
Yeah- buch of snide bullshit. here's something suspiciously similar, but more concise & funnier (& snider, & even more wrong about what I don't like)>
http://viceland.com/issues/v9n5/htdocs/10.php
Upgrade to PRO

Upload pictures, personalize your board, and more!

^     All messages            24-39 of 39  8-23 >>

Print | RSS Views: 3374 (Unique: 1625 ) / Subscribers: 2 | What's this?