Edited by author 12-22-2005 11:50 PM
There are a number of researchers who are flagging warnings about the adverse bio-effects of low non-thermal non-ionizing radiation. I was in quite a bit of disbelief therefore to read the FCC/FDA and WHO sites that suggested there were no harmful effects and focus only on the thermal effects.
I have read about:
- 3 studies showing RF-induced DNA breaks(Lai/Singh, Spanish study, and EU-sponsored REFLEX project)
- Studies finding children may be at greater risk (Spanish study/Hyland, Sweden's Lund University Hospital).
- Researchers across many countries reporting adverse health effects (Australia-Dr. Bruce Hocking, Italy-Fiorenzo Marinelli, Finland-Darius Leszczynski, Spain-Gerald Hyland, Germany U.Essen, Hungary U. Szeged, New Zealand-Neil Cherry, US U.Washington-Henry Lai)
- Reports of health effects at extremely low dosages from cell towers (
http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/masts.asp) (which although they may be lower than cell phones, radiate 24x7 and possibly at higher bandwidths)
- There are some postulating that rf would partially explain the recent rise of cancers and neurological disorders like Alzheimers, Parkinson's, cancers.
There are a number of people who have reported manipulation by the industry which helps comfort the public:
http://www.cancercoverup.com/newsletter/pr...l_phones_threat.asphttp://www.cnet.com/4520-6033_1-5741203-1.htmlI would also recommend the following sources:
Levitt, Blake (2 books related to this topic, one that also covers power line EMFs in addition to RF and also notes impacts of RF on ecology such as bird navigation, the other (Cell Towers book) has a chapter (ch.3) by Henry Lai on how low strength fields can have impacts over long durations of exposure)
Other web sites of interest:
http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/masts.asphttp://www.microwavenews.comhttp://www.iegmp.org.ukhttp://www.latitudes.orghttp://www.energyfields.orghttp://pages.britishlibrary.net/orange/http://www.emrnetwork.org/news/news.htm
