QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: An alternate objective function for Markovian fields
Views: 188, Unique: 125 
Subscribers: 0		What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 2-4  1-1 of 4        
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
  
Kristin BransonPerson was signed in when posted  1
05-28-2002 01:24 PM ET (US)
I don't understand the motivation for using C1 for CRFs. Using C0, they get an error rate of nearly 100%, so by just saying the opposite of what the CRF using C0 says, you'd get nearly 0% error. However, using C1, you get ~50% error, which the authors claim is optimal. If it's possible to consistently get ~100% error, then it is possible to consistently get ~0% error, so ~50% is not optimal, is it?
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 2-4  1-1 of 4        
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
 Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.