In class thursday, we briefly discussed how Judith Stacey's tone in the reading affected the reader. Recently, I had the pleasure of attending the Kenneth Randall lecture. After two hours of Philosophy lecture, I was able to attentively analyse Mr. Randall's position on the subjects upon which he spoke. I came to this conclusion: I can't decide.

The difference between the way Kenneth Randall presented arguments and the way Judith Stacey presented arguments lies in the manner in which the both apply personal opinion. Kenneth Randall states facts, both pro and con, and allows his audience to side with which ever side they feel represents their own views. Judith Stacey, on the other hand, presents an argument accompanied by persuasive statements and personal opinions to assist in the persuasion of her audience.

Judith Stacey's argumentive approach seems to amplify whatever view the reader/audience already holds on the subject. If one believes that the idea of the American Family is not fading into time, then her arguments can seem insulting and lead to that person to remain steadfast in their thoughts. On the other hand, if you can sympathize with her arguments, it is much easier to become a strong supporter of the views that she prescribes.