QuickTopic (SM) free message boards QuickTopic (SM) free message boards
Skip to Messages
  Sign In to access your topic list  |New Topic |My Topics|Profile
Upgrade to Pro   Customize, show pictures, add an intro, and more:   QuickTopic Pro...and check out QuickThreadSM
Topic: Conditional Random Fields
Views: 228, Unique: 157 
Subscribers: 0
What's
this?
Printer-Friendly Page
Subscribe to get & post, or stop messages by email Subscribe
All messages    << 2-7  1-1 of 7        
About these ads
Who | When
Messagessort recent-top   
Post a new message
 
Aldebaro  1
05-09-2002 04:03 AM ET (US)
Does anyone have an intuitive explanation for Eq. (1) (obtained by the fundamental theorem of random fields)?

While reading the theoretical part I got the impression that convergence would not be a problem for CRF, given that the authors mention: a) the loss is convex in the case of fully observable states and b) Eq. (2) can be easily computed and c) that a single iteration of their algorithms is equivalently to Baum-Welch (mentioned after Eq. (2), where I assume they meant one iteration of Baum-Welch). But, for my surprise, the experimental results showed that convergence is a big issue.
RSS link What's this?
All messages    << 2-7  1-1 of 7        
QuickTopicSM message boards
Over 200,000 topics served
Learn more Frequently asked questions  Acknowledgements
What they're saying about QuickTopic
 Questions, comments, or suggestions? Contact Us
Read our use policy before beginning. We value your privacy; please read our privacy statement.
Copyright ©1999-2008 Internicity Inc. All rights reserved.