| charles
|
1
|
 |
|
03-01-2002 04:30 AM ET (US)
|
|
um... whats the word... alarmism. i haven't bothered reading the link. why bother. it is a silly theory. within 1/2 hour of such a hack the publication would publicize it widely. most people read more than one publication. the impact would be negligable. the hacked paper or journal would atm not suffer much either. it doesn't matter all that much to the public unless the hackers are stealing govt info or credit card info.
but it is always fun to come up with doomsday theories, isn't it.
|